fangsport wrote:rolla_fxgt wrote: Oh they're not angels, but they haven't been as dodgy as either MSNZ or V8SC yet.
what a load of crap.... where did the ST chassis come from?? did Petch and Co just decide to do it ?? who also used (without permission) V8SC wings and splitters to set up the test mule?? who also waded into the Puke fight saying there series is far better and ATEED only needed to pay $250K instead of the $10-ishM for the Aussie counterparts.
ST Chasis came from Cerich or whatever his name is, based on a v8 chasis developed orignally for NZV8, but which the evidently didn't want. Hardly ST's fault that MSNZ/NZV8 couldn't write a proper contract and retain ownership of the intellectual property. But V8 chasis development is hardly rocket science, your not really reinventing the wheell are you. They could have developed any chasis, and it would have had features similar to other V8 race cars.
I thought they had permission to use the wings and splitters for testing, otherwise how did they get them?
Yes Petch was a moron winding up the monkeys. But what he actually said was wouldn't it be better to put less money into a local series, which in my opinion was a fair question to ask.
fangsport wrote:rolla_fxgt wrote: Why else would Tony C step in and say that he didn't think its a good idea blah blah blah, and "sugest" (his words) that teams shouldn't allow them to race in NZ in ST's.
the big picture suggests that V8SC are embarking on new TV contracts and want to protect their investment
Well hopefully they get decent contracts then. But not sure anyone in the TV broadcast world wants to deal with another Ecclestone clone. Ones enough for the world.
I love it how TC and it seems you think team owners can't think for themselves and think of their own interests. Because we all know that team owners are idiots right?
fangsport wrote:rolla_fxgt wrote: It has MSNZ fingerprints all over it. They are the only ones that benefit from V8SC not allowing big name drivers to compete in NZ in a ST.
don't you think V8SC lose out if their drivers have injuries sustained whle racing in NZ?? If it was in their off season, like most of the NZ summer series, they might be more lenient??
Yes they could loose out, but they let other drivers do other events or activities (including cycle races, which have a higher chance of injury than a car race) in the season. So I don't buy the argument that they've finally figured that out. If so, then they're a bit slow, after all how many years has it taken them to work it out.
It also shoots their want for other drivers from other series to come out for the Gold Coast race, unless they no longer want that now either? After all why do they expect other series to let their drivers come out for that, but not allow their drivers to go elsewhere?
Just a little hypocritical, I think everyone can agree on that.
I mean its all well and good for TC to make this call, and get teams in line, but you can bet that if drivers are prevented from racing in any other catagory, then the drivers will demand higher pay, and teams will have to get more sponsorship, or cut other costs. Eventually it'll mean the death of smaller teams, as they won't be able to afford the higher costs, to satisfy their drivers, and yet again V8SC will face another struggle.
But then again TC hasn't really ever been one to think about the consequences of his decsions in the long term.