by regamaster » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:18 am
hey guys,
after a while without a set of wheels, having uni starting and having money in the bank was pretty good, gave me a chance to look at other options other than a honda and also teach me that having some cash available for unexpected financial things pop up. Although having no car was all good, being able to use the olds vehicle, and with the above reasons in mind, and the rate of rising fuel prices, i decided to go for another cheap runner, fuel eco honda..
the thing is, i took a look at the vehicle, not too carefully, but I felt happy enough with it when I viewed the car, drove ok, seemed real cheap (yes i know .. thats not always a good thing), and as I've learnt in the past, not to buy a car without getting it inspected by proffessionals.
So as time went by, I arranged to get the car inspected, at this time, I knew it was either most probably going to be the AA or Car Inspection Services as I had heard that CIS was qutie a good alternative to AA, and had heard a few things about the AA. I have also had the AA come around and inspect a vehicle of my own for a potential buyer previously, and had a few faults come up which had no issues or problems at all (total b.s - checked, and double checked by mechanics). Also reading aroudn forums, there were other people who were asking around about inspection companies and who they recommended, same thing, if not AA (i've experienced some b.s from the AA bla bla bla), go for CIS..
So in this case, I decided to try CIS and at a rate of $115 it was sure to be comprehensive, just like any other, mobile, professionals, etc etc etc, all the b.s was listed on their website.
although i was more worried about engine condition, and rust, there were a few faults I did not know about before when i looked at it myself personally that was brought to my attention when I had gone over with my money in hand to finalise the deal. The engine stuff wasn't much of a worry, as a second hand engine/gearbox for the particular type is fairly cheap and parts for a honda are fairly cheap. but the other thing I cant stand is RUST! I sold my last civic that i poured some good money in to because it started rusting, real small tiny bits, and probably easily fixable, although I didn't wanna let it grow and not do anything about it, so instead of handling that problem, I flicked it off to a good home. I then looked at the report, and checked the bits about the body. The body yes, I personally saw what kind of condition the paint was, the front end had repairs done, and was explained by the honest owner, and had a few minor scratches and dings here and there, was all noted on the inspection form.
EXCEPT!!! - the fact that once I had handed over the money and it was all go out of their drive and a long drive home through the peak hour traffic all the way from howick back to the far west, I had a mate with me, stoked as, but when he had closer look, he found a small bit of rust that was growing near the boot (just like my old one, although in a different spot - still near the boot), and it was growing under the paint and had bubbled up (if thats the way to explain it). Furious to find this little bit, and not a mention or marking on the inspection sheet, i swore and swore until we decided to take the car up to his work and he'd give it a good clean as it was pretty filthy from the crappy weather. I soon discovered a larger bit of rust growing under the paint and bubbling just like the other bit near the boot, only this one was bigger and under the tailight, which i assume would be a little big bigger if the tailight was removed. With this in mind, I feel as I've been ripped off, and if I had been notified about this earlier, I would have reconsidered or atleast thought twice before handing over which isn't a huge amount, but well hard earned amount of money, and has me stumped as to what my rights are.
sorry this is a long story, but Im still up with uni in the morning, but this is something I would love to get resolved as its just such a big deal although it may not seem like it to others, and maybe if others saw the rust or the size of it, probably wouldnt matter, but Im a person who hates looking at rust, let alone knowing that my vehicle i planned on having for a while due to uni has rust growing on it and will need attending to later. I dont care that I paid $115 for the inspection, but knowing that the inspection wasn't what I was assured it was, and the make of break decision of handing over a sum of cash for something that was supposedly rust free (if i can say) and wasnt.
If anyone can give me some advice or some opinions then please do post up. I am planning on calling the company tomorrow or the inspector who did the job, but am not too sure how I should deal with it or to go about it, and what the outcome of these situations are.
Thanks