Superstrut to non superstrut

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby nzhogrider » Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:03 pm

I've got a 1996 BZG AE111 and it's super strut.
So they obviously did come out in them also.
Anyone tell me the differences to look for in regards to the facelift and non-facelift models ?
nzhogrider
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:52 pm
Location: Manawatu

Postby AUGASM » Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:44 am

TRD adjustables = $3700 8O
AUGASM
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: auckland

Postby bad20v » Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:49 am

As alot of people saw on sunday at the Import X thing, my BZR is not lowered at all from factory. It has standard s/strut suspension and I think it handles pretty good. Ive put it on the track plenty of times with no worries in the handling department. The only thing it was lacking in was the braking, but I have upgraded the pads and fluid since then anyway. The only reason that I would lower it was maybe for looks and to sharpen up the handling a bit, I had a better response from when I changed from 15" mags to 17" mags and lower profile tyres.
Unless your putting your vehicle on the track, or doing it up as a show car why bother with the full coilover system? $3700 is alot of money if your not going to use them properly, and with NZ roads, you might have to rebuild them more often than standard struts.
Your Opinion Means 1/16th Of Stuff All To Me So Dont Bother Arguing With Me About It As I Just Dont Care.

Thank-You.
User avatar
bad20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: With Master Yoda Smoking Doobies I am.

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:56 am

yup the best improvement you can make to your ae101/111 is a set of TRD springs and a good wheel alignment.

ignore the factory settings, they run 0.3 neg front and 1.3neg rear.... you want less neg in the rear and more in the front.

i run 1.3-1.5 in the front and 1 at the rear, made a huge difference. tyres wear perfectly even
but note that may not suit your driving style....

coil overs are a waste of money on the road.

and its a bit of a job converting from s/s to non, and not worth it at all. the arms only need replacing every now and then and its a lot cheaper to change them than the whole front suspension!
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby EssDub » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:14 pm

I've had mine converted from SS to non-SS, Only real downside was having to run single-pot calipers...

I chucked some stiffer and lower springs in it, GT shocks, lost the ABS system (not that it is even needed) and it cost me about $1400 ^_^

Hardest part i found was finding a subframe, i think we used one from an XZ levin, but not sure.

Handles on rails at the moment, even on 195/60/14 rubber :D :D
---------------------------------
1992 SW20 MR2 GT-S Turbo
---------------------------------
Previous Rides: Mazda 323, Toyota Levin BZ-G, 1992 SW20 MR2, 1994 Gen3 SW20 MR2 T-Bar
:)
User avatar
EssDub
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:15 pm
Location: New Plymouth

Postby 10k 20v » Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:38 pm

well i can dispoint a few people here now as you dont need to change the subframe at all,

the main reson i converted to non ss was to save unsprung weight and gain adjustability through the use of bilstiens and adjustable coil overs and i keeped the ABS and 2 pot calipers but thinking of uprgrading these in the future.
Image
User avatar
10k 20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: PUKEKOHE

Postby B1NZ » Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:32 pm

minijrocks wrote:mmmmm adjustable superstrut.......
how low can it go? does it still handle good. i want some i want some
( please dont say theyre like over $2000)


i have S/S with adjustables - although i only have adjustable damper and camber - not height which im not bothered about anyway, I think its GAB branded with Cusco camber plates - japan special (was on the car when i got it)

never had a problem with cornering, anyone thats been in it will tell you how it corners and braking is good with no brake fade on Lucas pads
Subaru GF8 Wagon
Subaru GC8 rally car project
http://www.hccc.org.nz - Keep up to date with all motorsport events in the Wellington region
User avatar
B1NZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6043
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Capital City

Postby 92GTApex » Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:39 pm

Any problem with using single piston non s/s front rotors and callipers without the ABS? Engine check light or any other problems like that?

Logan
Current ride: 92 Levin GT Apex
Current project: 91 Levin GT Apex (Crashed - It wasnt me)
www.area-51.co.nz
www.toyperformance.org.nz
www.lextreme.com
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1731
92GTApex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Dargaville, Way the hell up north

Postby Mr Revhead » Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:21 am

do you mean disabling ABS? if so you will need to cert it i beleive, if ABS dosent go, no wof for you!
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby 92GTApex » Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:49 am

Yeah thats what i was thinking... but was wondering if removing completely... in otherwords running a non s/s brake set up (as the factory did) would be all right for a warrant?
Otherwise im back on the look out for S/S front callipers, rotors, upright and lower rear arm

Logan
Current ride: 92 Levin GT Apex
Current project: 91 Levin GT Apex (Crashed - It wasnt me)
www.area-51.co.nz
www.toyperformance.org.nz
www.lextreme.com
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1731
92GTApex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Dargaville, Way the hell up north

Postby Mr Revhead » Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:56 am

talk to the wof ppl.
but if you remove it completely you may be ok. but if its left in but deactivated, then its a fail
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby 92GTApex » Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:25 pm

Yeah thats what i was thinking... but will check with my wof man before i go ahead with either option
Cheers

Logan
Current ride: 92 Levin GT Apex
Current project: 91 Levin GT Apex (Crashed - It wasnt me)
www.area-51.co.nz
www.toyperformance.org.nz
www.lextreme.com
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1731
92GTApex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Dargaville, Way the hell up north

Postby AceSniper » Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:33 pm

BZGEE wrote:I've had mine converted from SS to non-SS, Only real downside was having to run single-pot calipers...

I chucked some stiffer and lower springs in it, GT shocks, lost the ABS system (not that it is even needed) and it cost me about $1400 ^_^

Hardest part i found was finding a subframe, i think we used one from an XZ levin, but not sure.

Handles on rails at the moment, even on 195/60/14 rubber :D :D




dude... dont tell BS your car was converted coz it had been crashed in japan, and they xz gear would have been the cheapist for them to fit. I wont uncover the rest of your fibs just dont talk shit.
User avatar
AceSniper
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 10:55 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby CozmoNz » Tue Apr 26, 2005 4:47 pm

end of the day, Superstrut vs non superstrut, superstrut wins.

would you like *virable* toe in / out while cornering? no? then go for superstrut.

if you would rather your suspension parts pivoting around while cornering (thus, hindering your cornering ability), then go for non.

superstrut beats non, in factory trim.
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby 10k 20v » Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:13 pm

cosmo you'll find the superstrut has a toe change problem as well, just not so prominent and the ss is mega heavy.
Image
User avatar
10k 20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: PUKEKOHE

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:51 am

and it was designed to minimize camber change not toe.... for the wrc cars
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Dirtbag » Wed May 04, 2005 1:01 am

Is the superstrut mod on ae101s just on the front, or on both front and back?
AE101 GT-APEX Superstrut

My profile!
User avatar
Dirtbag
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed May 04, 2005 10:59 am

s/s is front only, however the shocks and bushes are diferent ratings on the rear. that only applies to stock parts though.
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby CozmoNz » Wed May 04, 2005 11:36 am

Mr Revhead wrote:and it was designed to minimize camber change not toe.... for the wrc cars


still minimises it :). well, sort of
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Previous

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests