2T 8valve EFI vs 4AGE 16valve redtop smallport

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:29 am

torque is EVERYTHING.

you gusy are mixing up extimated flywheel torque figures for atw figures that have been multiplied by the gearbox and diff
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby fangsport » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:49 am

Mr Revhead wrote:torque is EVERYTHING.


AMEN to that.

Torque wins races, HP sells cars.
I've been a bad bad boy. I should read the rules and behave before I get spanked by an admin

f#@k you i won't do what ya tell me

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fangwood/225658970893404
fangsport
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Timaru

Postby AE85coupe » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:52 am

standard redtop smallport (karls)

check out the torque line, says its at the wheels too



Image
AE85 Trueno *For sale*
Details of car here
User avatar
AE85coupe
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Dunedin

Postby suberimakuri » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:54 am

my results were atw as you can see above..... and so were the other ones listed supposedly.

why would you be worried about low down torque in a race?

if it makes good power for a few thou rpm then just turn it through that.
If torque by itself was important, then i should be driving around at 3000rpm as per the dyno graph.

any engine has enough "low down torque" to drive round on the street.
User avatar
suberimakuri
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:58 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Postby matt dunn » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:01 am

viewtopic.php?t=34715

Have a read through that.
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

Postby suberimakuri » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:21 am

meh, looking at peak power and comparing like that is a bit of a waste of time too, doesn't take into effect flywheels, or general tune.

i'm out.
User avatar
suberimakuri
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:58 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Postby AE85coupe » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:29 am

o.k i get the whole hp torque thing (if you really want to compare a car take it down the 1/4 mile)

but why is it karls redtop showed nearly 320nm at the wheels

when a 3t hyrbid which felt like it had more torque showed 162nm at the wheels?

both on supposedly reliable dynos

thats almost 160nm less torque
AE85 Trueno *For sale*
Details of car here
User avatar
AE85coupe
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Dunedin

Postby wde_bdy » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:34 am

Gear ratios and correction factors.

Dyno's are very rarely setup and operated the same, so are simply not comparable. What you need to do take the KW readings at set points (1000, 2000, 3000rpm etc) then calculate out the torque from their.

86kw at 10,000 rpm makes less torque than 86kw at 4000rpm. However if the gearing is setup to suit they can still make the same torque at the wheels.

Callum
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby AE85coupe » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:48 am

dam its tricky comparing these two cars then

still surely a stock 4age thats showing 86kw at the wheels at 7200rpm (i guess)

vs a fairly decently worked 3t hybrid showing 84kw at the wheels at 6000rpm

its not looking too good for the 3t?
AE85 Trueno *For sale*
Details of car here
User avatar
AE85coupe
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Dunedin

Postby Malcolm » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:01 pm

I've got a suggestion - forget about the value of the torque given by the dyno.

Torque is varied through a drivetrain every time there is an form of reduction (gearbox, diff). This means the torque measured at the wheels will be several times what it really is at the engine.

Power, however, is constant, regardless of what reductions it might go through (not accounting for drivetrain losses).

I was simply showing that math to prove how inaccurate the torque figures given by dyno's are. It represents neither torque at the wheels nor torque at the engine, although I'm sure it's supposed to show torque at the engine, it is quite clearly very wrong. And no, there's nothing wrong with my calculations.
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby wde_bdy » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:05 pm

Realistically the only way to compare is track times. It would all come down to setup, if your car is designed to match the powerband of the engine it will outperform one that isn't. Too many variables, unless you run same car, same driver etc. Then the gearing etc will suit one motor more than the other.

Callum
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby suberimakuri » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:13 pm

ok, well 84kw worked 3t sounds like waste of time if stock 4age is more hp.

the torque compares between all our dyno results on torques dyno, and kiwi-re, and others that i have seen.
User avatar
suberimakuri
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:58 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Postby NA Drifter » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:58 pm

well, imagine this... going up a hill (at 5th gear for example), rev drop due to not enough "power", so you drop the gear to 4th, or maybe even 3rd... so you will get more "power".
Are they really the "power" that make the car going up hill easy? or the torque?
You shift down the gear to change the gearbox ratio... and that will incress your torque!.. as you still have the same engine in the car.. same hp will be produced, not torque.
gearing change torque.... output
Keith
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/profile.php?id=404

Austin Mini with 1275,TT140 Corona GT-TR with 3TGTEU, TE71 GT Levin with 2TGEU, AE86 Trueno 4AGE, AE85 Trueno 3A, Hilux Surf with 2JZGEU
User avatar
NA Drifter
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1624
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 2:43 pm
Location: Palmerston North

Postby cozmoid » Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:19 pm

AE85coupe wrote:both on supposedly reliable dynos



Man no dyno is reliable
Image
Ae70/Te71 Hybrid
viewtopic.php?t=54364
User avatar
cozmoid
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby AE85coupe » Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:17 pm

thats true
AE85 Trueno *For sale*
Details of car here
User avatar
AE85coupe
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Dunedin

Postby suberimakuri » Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:28 pm

i disagree, torque seems super reliable when comparing runs.
and that dyno compares to kiwi-re who run dyno dynamics, and they all compare to bellars which have dyno dynamics as well.
and those compare to the dyno in palmy that keith went on, torque one i think.

they normally run in shootout mode, which is meant to mean they all run same factors as aussie and usa.

the only ones i'm unsure about as haven't tested is hub dynos.
User avatar
suberimakuri
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:58 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Previous

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests