Mr Ree wrote:On the contrary to Lith's experience with them, I couldnt be happier with my emanage ultimate, it does exactly what its supposed to do, and has never caused any issues. Has lots of features too, not normally found with your typical piggyback.
My car starts, idles, and runs 100% like stock. Who knows, maybe it works better on some setups than others?
I never said it doesn't do it's job - our experience sounds similar, just our opinion on using a hack to be responsible for injector and ignition control is conflicting. The E-Manage did exactly what we told it the whole way through, though the experience would have been a great amount nicer if we had a proper stand alone ECU instead of trying to force or trick the stock ECU's hand. I don't like trusting the stock ECU when you can never be too sure what it's going to try to decide to do, or attempt to do when it realises it isn't in control.
One of the easiest to explain situations which should express what I didn't like about tuning with the E-Manage, bearing in mind we needed to get a tune together which would allow it to be run on fuel easily found at the pump in NZ.... if you disagree with my thoughts on the place of an EManage ECU, interested to know your thoughts on these points I encountered tuning one on the Prelude:
- BB6 Honda Prelude ECU runs a factory wideband O2 sensor and an ECU which trims from it's output REALLY quickly. Trying to build a base injector adjustment table to make it at least closer to target (so the whole tune doesn't rely on closed loop to make it tidy) is pretty much impossible, and when in closed loop you are stuck to the Honda ECU's targets.
- The stock ECU doesn't seem to limit it's fuel trims - you could max out the E-Manage injector adjustment and the Honda ECU will trim it back to run it's intended target. At least to the point we tried to.
- If the stock ECU doesn't get it's O2 sensor signal, or if the reading is not what it expects and it cannot trim it to hit it's target then instead of giving up it goes into limp mode which seems to involve (from the E-Manage logs) throwing spark at random HEAVILY retarded points and behaving generally like a douche
- The ever proactive Honda ECU will go into lambda targetting when the rpm change drops below a certain rate, which means steady state dyno tuning is impossible as it would even target 1λ at wide open throttle if the RPM aren't changing. MBT tuning is pointless if you don't have the same air fuel mixture in the cylinder you would NORMALLY have, not to mention there is no way I am going to sit on the dyno at 4500rpm at WOT on 98octane running at 1λ on an engine running that kind of compression etc so it means you can't using steady state tuning to build a sensible timing map which sucks arse on an engine where the points of being under and over advanced are relatively close to each other
The reasons I have for suggesting the MAPECU may be a better choice if you are hugely compelled to go with a hack ECU is that it is locally developed, still being supported and developed and has some very nice features which are easily comparable with the EMU - as well as others, such as being able to create a map of BS lambda readings to feed the stock ECU to keep it thinking it is running the show.
except im putting out around 100% more power than the factory setup
http://nzhondas.com/lower-north-island/142325-nzhondas-summer-dyno-day-stm-2nd-feb.htmlShould go to this - would be quite interesting to see what it is making, MAPC's dyno turned out to be fairly erratic, it got clearer and clearer the more I used it... would be interesting to see what it made on dyno that held and measured power consistently
Im not saying they are the best thing since sliced bread, but if you dont want to go to a standalone, the EMU sure beats an SAFC, any day of the week.
This we can agree with.
2jayzgte wrote:So Lith don't you rate F-Cons they have the ability to do both run standalone and piggy-back.
I never said anything about HKS F-Cons
I've never used one, so can't really comment on them... part of the reason for that is as far as I understand you basically have to be a workshop and get permission to (and even pay to?) have the right to tune an FCon on a case by case basis? Basically there is not a huge amount of support for them in NZ and they are rare as hens teeth here, so the only reasons I'd have to not recommend one of those would be the fact that they aren't that cheap, not that common and therefore long term support isn't that guaranteed. Nothing to do with the ECU's actual capabilities.
The reason the E-Manage Ultimate was chosen for the car I had tuned was that it's active diff setup has a proprietory can-like connection to the diff control which the protocol for has not been distributed or cracked meaning if a stand alone ECU is chosen the diff becomes an open diff, and the owner was not interested in swapping it out for an aftermarket LSD. At the time when we did research it seemed like an F-ConV Pro could be the gun choice if it weren't for the fact we wouldn't be able to tune it ourselves, and be limited to perhaps two workshops in NZ I know of off hand who CURRENTLY will tune them and no guarantee of if that number will go up or down.
Probably worth noting that NZ and Australia developed ECUs are increasing in popularity in Japan, too.... a lot of cars over there using the likes Link/ViPEC etc these days despite having the likes of FCons, EManage, PFC etc being locally made and supported since ages ago.