AC Intercooling?

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby pc » Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:28 pm

Use a tank of gas compressed into a liquid and regulate it's flow/expansion in the cooling device as needed by computer?
This way you get air-con without having the pumping equipment or parasitic loss on the vehicle. The gas can be compressed and cooled on the sideline by other equipment.

problems:
- adds weight to the car
- need a smart control system, probably tied into the engine computer
- limited run time (may not be worth it at all)
- potentially dangerous with uncontrolled release (bad crash)
- expensive

i'm sure some complicated math would show it's viability... the calculations are beyond me though.
red car
1/4 mile - 14.683s @ 91.83mph
Manfield - 1:24s
Taupo - Track1 1:53s (road tyres) - Track2 1:22s - Track3 48s (with esses) - Track4 1:58s
User avatar
pc
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Hutt Yo!

Postby touge_ae101 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:45 pm

although the group of critics which is toyspeed think don't this is a good idea, i reckon it is a fantastic idea that i've thought about before but it seems you have the perfect platform to do it with!

apparently 1UZ's have a awesome AC pump that some guys use for airbags so that might be a start.. but you could just run the refridgerant lines through the intake pipe to cool the charge just before the plenum? then all you need to do is keep the coolant cold and circulate it.
i would imagine that the extra power you gain from having a constant 5-10deg cooler is much greater than the power it saps.
User avatar
touge_ae101
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1730
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:23 pm
Location: Palmerston North

Postby iOnic » Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:55 am

You think it's a fantastic idea to take something that's only designed for cooling ambient air and use it to cool superheated intake charge for 6 hours at 90%+ duty cycle? It's been done before - google it. It was an a big back of dicks in reality. It's just a very complicated and heavy setup to achieve something that can just as easily be achieved with W2A intercoolers/water sprayers/methanol injection/alcohol fuel
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby RomanV » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:14 am

An interesting idea that I've heard of somewhere (someone on here mentioned it?) but never seen implemented, is having a giant air resevoir tank somewhere in the car.

The BOV feeds excess air into the tank, and pressurises it to a certain psi level.

Then when the car is off boost, it pumps all of the air from the tank back into the intake manifold, bringing the boost threshold to a lower rpm and minimising lag.

Relevance to thread = minimal, but I think you should do it anyway Redmist :lol:
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby pc » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:48 pm

touge_ae101 wrote:i would imagine that the extra power you gain from having a constant 5-10deg cooler is much greater than the power it saps.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law ... modynamics
While you may be able to store up some "cooling" for use at occasional times, you can't have it running all of the time and have it effective... net result will be a loss of power.
red car
1/4 mile - 14.683s @ 91.83mph
Manfield - 1:24s
Taupo - Track1 1:53s (road tyres) - Track2 1:22s - Track3 48s (with esses) - Track4 1:58s
User avatar
pc
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Hutt Yo!

Postby RedMist » Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:20 pm

pc wrote:
touge_ae101 wrote:i would imagine that the extra power you gain from having a constant 5-10deg cooler is much greater than the power it saps.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law ... modynamics
While you may be able to store up some "cooling" for use at occasional times, you can't have it running all of the time and have it effective... net result will be a loss of power.

Its the nature of offroad racing to be agressive, but in bursts. The only reason you'll ever use full throttle on 500+hp is a quick prod to pull the back end around for better attitude in corners or when you're mid way into acceleration on a long straight (the beginning you're controlling spin, the end you're controlling flight).
As stated the complexity of the solution, even given that I could cool the charge perhaps 90% of throttle utilisation, means that I'll not implement it.
On reflection most of the time I race it's in the depths of winter. It's no wonder my silly little chinese MR2 intercoolers work so well... ambiant is often below zero C!
The answer is Helmholtz!

Toyota ST185 Celica Rally.
Toyota ST205 Celica Rally.
Jimco/ Cosworth 350z Offroader - 609whp at 16psi
User avatar
RedMist
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 12:39 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby RedMist » Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:22 pm

RomanV wrote:An interesting idea that I've heard of somewhere (someone on here mentioned it?) but never seen implemented, is having a giant air resevoir tank somewhere in the car.

The BOV feeds excess air into the tank, and pressurises it to a certain psi level.

Then when the car is off boost, it pumps all of the air from the tank back into the intake manifold, bringing the boost threshold to a lower rpm and minimising lag.

Relevance to thread = minimal, but I think you should do it anyway Redmist :lol:


Why have a noiseless lag reducing system?.. when I can have good old fashon "bang bang!" antilag. YEAH BABY!
Becides it'll either have a GTX or a EFR on it. Both of which are lag reducing turbo's. I'm thinking GTX3076r so I can run antilag or EFR7064 to keep everything integrated and nicely packaged.
The answer is Helmholtz!

Toyota ST185 Celica Rally.
Toyota ST205 Celica Rally.
Jimco/ Cosworth 350z Offroader - 609whp at 16psi
User avatar
RedMist
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 12:39 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby pc » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:12 pm

NOS not allowed?
red car
1/4 mile - 14.683s @ 91.83mph
Manfield - 1:24s
Taupo - Track1 1:53s (road tyres) - Track2 1:22s - Track3 48s (with esses) - Track4 1:58s
User avatar
pc
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Hutt Yo!

Postby molex » Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:12 pm

Run it on E85 + have an upstream injector for mad cooling effect?

Run conventional WTA with load dependant water misters, these can actually be quite efficient with the water usage if it's tuned correctly and if you're right about the types of throttle position averages you're likely to use. Evaporation is about the only feasible way i can think of to reduce IAT's with low compexity/not violating physics
molex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby KinLoud » Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:24 am

Yeah, 180 degree turn in airflow is used in some aircraft turbine engines, i.e. PT6 family of turboprop engines.
They have a little flapper door that can be opened to allow ice to be carried out of the airduct due to it's inertia.

I'm thinking extra forced cooling of all radiators and intercoolers would be most effective.
All radiators and coolers at 90degrees to airflow and shrouded to protect from direct mud impact.
Have extra/bigger alternator to power the big powerful fans.
Or
Go the Toyota way on some of the bigger engines (1uz, 2jz) and use hydraulically powered fans.

Ken
I used to think that the orange and green tictacs gave you special powers. The orange ones would make you stronger and the green ones would make you faster. So i used to eat some green ones and run around my lounge as fast as i could, then eat the orange ones and try to pick up the sofa. I wish it were true!
User avatar
KinLoud
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 7:39 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby gepsk8 » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:56 pm

why not change turbos to marine turbos run pure glycol cooling exhaust housings, with small pump & radiator.
O272754663
gepsk8
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Palmerston North

Postby Malcolm » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:37 pm

Heat generated in the intake air by turbos is little to do with conduction from the housing and a lot to do with compressing it. A colder turbo will make SFA difference to intake temps, but will probably perform worse if you're removing energy from the exhaust gas stream before sending it through the turbine
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby blindnz » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:43 pm

liquid nitrogen is the answer...
User avatar
blindnz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby matt dunn » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:25 pm

KinLoud wrote:All radiators and coolers at 90degrees to airflow and shrouded to protect from direct mud impact.


I don't think air flow at 90 deg to the radiator is the most effective way to take the most heat out of it. A little angle of attack is better as you get more air contact with the surfaces.
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

Postby iOnic » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:00 am

blindnz wrote:liquid nitrogen is the answer...


Wouldn't stay liquid for very long - and that stuff is so cold that it would make just about anything it came in contact with brittle to the point that it shattered. The answer has already been mentioned multiple times in this topic.
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Previous

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests