Moderator: The Mod Squad
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Dell'Orto wrote:So enlighten us, how do you tune a stock Toyota ECU?
MAGN1T wrote:stuff
blindnz wrote:Fuel quality monitoring is actually conducted from the pump regularly, so I would imagine your 98 or pretty damn close to be sold as 98 otherwise its in breach of consumer laws.
MAGN1T wrote:
Internet myth no 5463 gone.
For the likes of older ECUs like 4AGE there's plenty of affordable piggybacks, it still depends on what you want to do with it.
EG if you were starting off with a map sensored ECU and adding cams you might do different mods than for adding a turbo.
The more you read, the more you learn, so long as you keep away from US based forums which tend to be bad for your mental health.
Steve
MAGN1T wrote:Using Mitsubishi as an example, which is where a lot of my experience is, The GTO ECU is non chippable, non reflashable, The only real limitation is the rev limiter at 7200.
Mines did an upgrade many years ago, It involves removing the processor, adding a socket to where the processor was, fitting a daughter board with processor to that along with 2 eproms. That allows the rev limiter to be raised/disabled and whatever else, last price I had on that was about $1K. Fitting a faster clock crystal to the processor does the same thing ($5 mod, AFR and timing change too but that can be compensated for).
The 3000GT 1/4 mile record in US still stands at 8.6, that's with a Mines (G force) modded factory ECU and ARC2 fuel controller plus a few extra bits.
Of course there's a whole industry out there claiming that standalones are far better but the fastest standalone in the same sort of car is still .7 sec slower, has been for years.
So how are they better? on one forum someone said that they're fully mappable. All that means to me is that it's easier to get it completely wrong.
Steve
sergei wrote:
There is also Apexi ECU but not sure how good it is (ask Akane).
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 35 guests