But this doesnt seem to make sense to me.
I mean if the car had no engine, and you tried to turn the transmission by hand (assuming the wheels were off the ground) It would take a certain amount of torque to be applied before anything even moved.
So it seems strange to think that transmission losses could be expressed as a percentage, I would have thought it would be a fixed amount.
eg. to turn XXXX transmission at 3000RPM, takes 30 ft/lbs of torque.
To turn the same transmission at 5000RPM takes 50 ft/lbs of torque.
So if your engine made 100 ft/lbs of torque at 5000RPM, it would be 50% transmission loss.
If you made 500 ft/lbs of torque, you would only have 10% transmission loss.
Its not as if it takes more work to turn these parts if you have more power?
