Blow through AFM on 3SGTE?

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Blow through AFM on 3SGTE?

Postby Ako » Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:46 pm

Okay, found something weird with the wee car this weekend. Was looking at the pipework and wondering why the injectors were pre - turbo. Then it occurred to me that noones that daft, and besides, the pipework was all the wrong shapes.

So.. The AFM on the wee car has been placed between the intercooler and the throttle body, but before the extra injectors. Also amusing to note it ran no BOV, depsite the TD06-25g hanging on the side of it. Has a tial 50mm now, should be nice and rowdy.

ANYWAY - question is, can the toymota AFMs work happily in this manner? Or should I just sort it so it goes to pre - turbo, like a normal setup should be.
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby CozmoNz » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:07 pm

go for gold, the air goes through it one way or another ;)

alot of the afm 4agze boys just run the afm just before the throttle body (also allowing a vented bov BEFORE the afm (no over compensating)

i dont get what you mean by the injectors..

alot of extra injectors are mounted before the throttle... and only turned on via a switch etc anyway, and youll be at full throttle then ANYWAY (same as nos)...

hold on... PRE turbo? as in injectors firing into the turbo? that seems very silly :S
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Malcolm » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:14 pm

well I actually used to run my AFM between intercooler and throttle body, here's a pic:
Image

when I originally did this, I was under the belief that the AFM measured mass air flow, which is constant throughout the system, however from what I've read since then, it seems the AFM measures volumetric airflow, which of course changes greatly when the air is pressurised, so for instance at 1bar of boost, the AFM will be reading HALF the amount of air that is present.

So, to summarise, it worked fine for me, but I think I just got lucky and the engine probably would have crapped out sooner or later, and I wouldn't do it again.
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby IH8TEC » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:15 pm

as in like what i have on my car? look in the bottom right pic.

it works very well, and the extra injector is between the afm and t/b too
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby CozmoNz » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:18 pm

your kidding right all_fours?

if you were only getting HALF the fuel (half measured air), your be running HOW lean again?

your engine wouldnt live... .. at all :D


im not sure about the "air going through" bit, but i do disagree with the half fuel idea.. if thats true, there wont be many if any 4agze afm turbo's without converting to link (orrrrrrr obviously afm before turbo)
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Ako » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:22 pm

CozmoNz wrote:go for gold, the air goes through it one way or another ;)

alot of the afm 4agze boys just run the afm just before the throttle body (also allowing a vented bov BEFORE the afm (no over compensating)

i dont get what you mean by the injectors..

alot of extra injectors are mounted before the throttle... and only turned on via a switch etc anyway, and youll be at full throttle then ANYWAY (same as nos)...

hold on... PRE turbo? as in injectors firing into the turbo? that seems very silly :S


Nope, mine are controlled properly - you can adjust their own timing, and they are activated by RPM and boost.

Anyway, to clarify for cozmos benifit - its set up just like the 3SGTE in the pics above. Nice downpipe by the way!

My thinking was the same as yours all_4s, wasn't sure how the toyotas measured air flow. I'll move it to pre - turbo, not worth taking the chance on. I know (well, think) some afms measure air volume, needed to see if the toyota one will actually measure compressed air properly or not.

Silly japanese people doing funny things to my car!
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:49 pm

So you're saying it never had a T67? Was only a TD06? Geez that had some oddball stuff alright! Flag the extra injectors and do it properly anyway :P
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Ako » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:55 pm

Bear in mind the designations trust use for turbos are still mitsi turbos. T67 is a td06 front cover, and td07 rear, for example. A 25G is still a very large turbo for a 2L engine, the evo boys pull 450hp out of it EASY.

That said, the majority of things I THOUGHT this car had to start with, were wrong once I actually doing my own hunting around on it. i.e the 262 cams which are actually 274 (according to the machiney thing at kelfords), the turbo, blah blah.

And doing it properly... Nah. I'll get it running, get it making a little power safely, then sell it on. I've got a cefiro here which is far too amusing to pass up, and resale on the mr2 wont get any better if I spend more $$ on it or not - your car is testament to that.
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:57 pm

Yeah, and as you can see, no-one wants to buy MR2's, so you're stuck with Pinky forever, might as well modify the shit out of it :lol:
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Malcolm » Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:28 am

CozmoNz wrote:your kidding right all_fours?

if you were only getting HALF the fuel (half measured air), your be running HOW lean again?

your engine wouldnt live... .. at all :D


im not sure about the "air going through" bit, but i do disagree with the half fuel idea.. if thats true, there wont be many if any 4agze afm turbo's without converting to link (orrrrrrr obviously afm before turbo)


Well I certainly didn't say it would have half the fuel, because I'm sure the ECU knows quite a lot about airflow based on RPM and throttle position (some race-based ECU's only use RPM and throttle position for fueling, I've heard), and I'm almost certain that the AFM showing half the airflow would not mean the car would only get half it's required airflow. And if you wonder how lean it was running, when I took the turbo off it was WHITE, same with the spark plugs. I also can't comment on how the airflow meter reacts to pressurised, and thus denser, air. It seems reasonable to suspect the extra mass of the air might force the flapper further open, but it wouldn't be enough to account for the change in air volume.

I certainly wouldn't risk running it like that again. I would be very suprised if most people doing 4AGZE turbo conversions put the airflow meter anywhere other than between air filter and turbo, where it's supposed to go.
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby vvega » Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:42 am

ive seen a few people do run it that was
bazda was one of them

his motor worked very well like that
v
vvega
 

Postby IH8TEC » Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:23 am

i have his old i/c setup, seems to work very well for me too,
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby Malcolm » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:40 pm

well mine worked well too, I mean it was good enough to make me the fastest gt4 in the world on stock ecu according to alltrac.net (now gtfour.ca and I think others have beaten me now), but I certainly think it's unwise as the AFM isn't a mass flow device (like a hotwire or similar type sensor)
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Mr Revhead » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:54 pm

bazdas set up also used a few tricks to alter the fuelling.....
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby IH8TEC » Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:38 pm

yeah, change the afm to give it more fuel, + the extra injector.

for the afm http://www.mr2sc.com/websites/tech/Adju ... 20Fuel.htm
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm


Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests