Moderator: The Mod Squad
Jingle Balls wrote:It's been using a fair bit of fuel ($20 lasts under 100km with sensible driving - which seems high to me).
BZG|Bling wrote:Jingle Balls wrote:It's been using a fair bit of fuel ($20 lasts under 100km with sensible driving - which seems high to me).
Work out how much fuel $20 actually gets you...(f**k all) then take another look at the economy and decide if that's high or not.
blindnz wrote:my gt-four gets like 130km of $40 around town... the trueno (NA) gets around 105km from $20 so i would think 100km for $20 from a straight 6 is all good
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
1I1 wrote:Agrees with Sergei.
If going off the $ per km ratio, my 20v seems to be $40 per 200km which prob isn't too bad considering thats $40 of 98 (so very little petrol)
Dell'Orto wrote:Dollar value is pointless, fuel fluctuates too often for it to be a good guide. Hell $20 used to get my RX7 into wellington, around all night and back again
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
1I1 wrote:If going off the $ per km ratio, my 20v seems to be $40 per 200km which prob isn't too bad considering thats $40 of 98 (so very little petrol)
sergei wrote:Fill it up, reset trip meter, drive almost full tank, then fill it up again, record litres at the pump and km on trip meter (then you can figure out either L/100km or km/L, whatever floats your boat). Do this a few times. This is the most accurate way of measuring fuel economy practically.
Jingle Balls wrote:1I1 wrote:If going off the $ per km ratio, my 20v seems to be $40 per 200km which prob isn't too bad considering thats $40 of 98 (so very little petrol)
i did some tests on this and i found that my 4age got more k's out of 98 for the same amount of money as 95, and 95 got further than 91. So 98 not only gives better performance, but the better performance gives better economy for the dollar. I've run 98 in all cars i've owned since then. I'm yet to test this on the big 6 cyl though
cat007 wrote:sergei wrote:Fill it up, reset trip meter, drive almost full tank, then fill it up again, record litres at the pump and km on trip meter (then you can figure out either L/100km or km/L, whatever floats your boat). Do this a few times. This is the most accurate way of measuring fuel economy practically.
I agree
BUT
I have a bit of a problem with carrying an extra +50kg around of fuel for no reason. Hence why I rarely fill up - and will often put ~$40 in at a time.
sergei wrote:
Fill it up, reset trip meter, drive almost full tank, then fill it up again, record litres at the pump and km on trip meter (then you can figure out either L/100km or km/L, whatever floats your boat). Do this a few times. This is the most accurate way of measuring fuel economy practically.
sergei wrote:
Well it is not always 50+kg. And you can do it once in a while for statistics.
cat007 wrote:sergei wrote:
Well it is not always 50+kg. And you can do it once in a while for statistics.
true. Except in this case here he has at least a 60L tank. I wouldn't be surprised if it had a +70L one tbh....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests