Toyspeed.org.nz Message Board

by **diss7** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:53 pm

Pretty easy choice I wouldve thought.

by **samlloyd** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:42 pm

Oh so now its a WRC st205. Oh okay.

The rally edition Celica.

GTR has a rally edition too. The GTAE

by **Meadzy** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:46 pm

yer that is pretty easy choice..GTR ftw!

by **bluemaumau** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:49 pm

gt4, mazdas are crudbukets

Website · by **Emperor** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:26 pm

ST205

by **Meadzy** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:57 pm

bluemaumau wrote:gt4, mazdas are crudbukets

there like every other car, if you treat them right and dont rape the balls off them like every other gtx owner they hold together quite nicely, and with only exhuast and filter combo they make around 300hp which is around a flat 13, makes it very appealing car imo

by **Adamal** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:10 pm

After 'transporting' my boss' rallied up GTX to work today, I would say that they're not really crudbuckets. Most fun I've had in a while!

by **rotorchiki69** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:10 am

imo the celeca has the body lines of an ant eater granted the engines a decent rally winning breed i will always class them a girls car there is a reason why there not as popular
the famillia is an out and out drivers car that has the looks to match

by **Chickenman** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:30 am

$&#$% that, Celica is way better looking than a gtx

My old one was heaps of fun though (not really gtx.. fwd 1600 turbo + 18lbs = slightly worn crank).

by **Silent Knight** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:21 am

Mazdas are the devils play thing.
They can all burn in hell!!

And this is coming from someone with an intense hatred of 3S engines...

by **Meadzy** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:05 am

Chickenman wrote:$&#$% that, Celica is way better looking than a gtx My old one was heaps of fun though (not really gtx.. fwd 1600 turbo + 18lbs = slightly worn crank).

umm were not comparing them to gtx's :roll:

by **BINGBUNG** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:14 am

gt4 celicas are the most ulgyest cars ever!! give me a gtr anyday.
OHHH hang on i already have one :lol:

by **Mad Murphy** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:38 am

Meadzy wrote:and with only exhuast and filter combo they make around 300hp

That sounds more than a bit optimistic to me.

by **Lith** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:49 am

Mad Murphy wrote:
Meadzy wrote:and with only exhuast and filter combo they make around 300hp

That sounds more than a bit optimistic to me.

Believe it or not, its not.... Familia GTRs go very very well with basic mods. They've been known to crack 200kw @ wheels without going too insane in mods.

I still voted the GT4 Celica though, I prefer the overall package.

by **Chickenman** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:20 am

Meadzy wrote:
Chickenman wrote:$&#$% that, Celica is way better looking than a gtx My old one was heaps of fun though (not really gtx.. fwd 1600 turbo + 18lbs = slightly worn crank).

umm were not comparing them to gtx's

$&#$% off.. they look almost exactly the same.

I didn't say anything about handling/power/repco vents etc..

edit...

Sorry the GTR looks worse than the GTX upon further research

New Car Again · by **HELBND** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:45 pm

mazda gtr/gtx just screams 16 y/o shoreboy

i voted st205 but i wouldve also gone for the "neither" option

by **Adamal** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:02 pm

HELBND wrote:mazda gtr/gtx just screams 16 y/o shoreboy

I can imagine you in an GTR/GTX

Shave a bit and you could pass as 16

by **Jebus** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Id take the GTR, smaller, faster, more responsive.

ST205 would bore me to death, and if have to kick my own ass for owning a car with a 65465" high spolier and big mud flaps.

by **crnkin** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:20 pm

If youve ever driven both cars, the choice would be so easy you would sit back and laugh at all these comments.......

by **mr pad** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:41 pm

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL at these comments

Toyspeed.org.nz Message Board

ST205 or Mazda GTR

Which would you rather have? ST205 WRC or Mazda GTR

ST205 or Mazda GTR

Who is online