rollaholic wrote:calling people cheapskates is a bit harsh.
In the situation stated they are being cheapskates, especially when it's false economy, as it often is when buying cheap parts. Take a look at the thread title to get an idea of what I'm on about.
no-one wants to pay more than they have to, and not everyone has large budgets.
Then perhaps they shouldn't buy large budget items until they can afford to, buying cheap parts is often a very expensive way to achieve your goals. As pointed out above, in the long term the cheapest option overall is often the most expensive at time of purchase.
There are ways to economise without sacrificing performance & reliability, buying secondhand is one of those.
It's also not always about reliability, sometimes it's about features and usability. e.g. in 2001 I bought a Motec M800, today it's still considered top of the range, yet I haven't had to spend any more money to keep updating it, software updates are free, and I could sell it for not much less than I paid for it. Whereas if I'd purchased some of the other ECU's available I would either had to pay for continuous upgrades, or replaced it several times over probably selling the old ECU at a considerable loss, and I would still not had the functionality that the M800 gives me. It will run any car I would am likely to buy in the next 20 years for just the cost of a new loom (about $200). By the time I've finished using it it will have cost me about $150/year. If somebody offered you a Motec for $150/year would you take it?