Page 1 of 3

Should Auckland pay for everyone else's problems?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:16 pm
by Parker
With the recent flooding the Farmers in the lower north and south island have been having a big cry. These girly men have lost lost their lively hoods, and they want a pay out from the government. Yet these were the same people whining about the government paying for Aucklands roads. Well, why should Aucklanders have to pay to help these people?

What have they done for us? They export their best meat over seas and make us pay ultra high prices for second class meat. Why should we help them out? You get what you give you whining beyatches.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:20 pm
by B1NZ
Its offical, You are a complete cock (obviously with an incomplete cock)
Maybe because its classed as a natural disaster area, where is your hub of nz without anything to export??

And tell me how much you guys pay for meat, milk, petrol up there if you think its so high?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:30 pm
by Parker
B1NZ wrote:Its offical, You are a complete cock (obviously with an incomplete cock)
Maybe because its classed as a natural disaster area, where is your hub of nz without anything to export??

And tell me how much you guys pay for meat, milk, petrol up there if you think its so high?


The Price rises in Meat and milk have been far larger than inflation even though costs have gone down in production with new technologies etc.

It's official, you have no cock, no brain, and i'm pretty sure no balls either. Your insult was overly lame and only emphasises your general lameness. Don't pass on your own fears of the fact that your penis hasn't grown since you were five, making it incomplete.

This is a serious discussion, please remove yourself.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:40 pm
by B1NZ
Parker wrote: Your insult was overly lame and only emphasises your general lameness.


No more lame than your comment at me in the other poll :P

So give us the prices? We dont want this economic bullshit, we want prices!!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:49 pm
by Parker
B1NZ wrote:
Parker wrote: Your insult was overly lame and only emphasises your general lameness.


No more lame than your comment at me in the other poll :P

So give us the prices? We dont want this economic bullshit, we want prices!!


So you want me to give you the price of all the different kinds of meat even though it had no relevance whatsoever to the poll? ...yeah right.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:17 pm
by gt4mike
Parker does have a point... and the auckland traffic could be classified as a disaster. The lost income of all the people sitting in their cars for hours each day would certainly build up to more than the recovery costs for these farms. I'm sure parker doesnt actually think we shouldnt help the farmers out, but I think he's just sticking it back in your face after your comments in the other thread.

Well done.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:22 pm
by PumpN
gt4mike wrote:Parker does have a point... and the auckland traffic could be classified as a disaster. The lost income of all the people sitting in their cars for hours each day would certainly build up to more than the recovery costs for these farms. I'm sure parker doesnt actually think we shouldnt help the farmers out, but I think he's just sticking it back in your face after your comments in the other thread.

Well done.


only an aucklander, im gonna shake my head and not go there .... i should give you all an earfull (apart from B1NZ cos he actually has a brain, one that works) but im gonna drop this and laugh at the both of you

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:44 pm
by Parker
gt4mike wrote:Parker does have a point... and the auckland traffic could be classified as a disaster. The lost income of all the people sitting in their cars for hours each day would certainly build up to more than the recovery costs for these farms. I'm sure parker doesnt actually think we shouldnt help the farmers out, but I think he's just sticking it back in your face after your comments in the other thread.

Well done.


Holy Shi'te, intelligence! Ruin my fun why don't you!

Your post on the other thread was only second to mine in brilliance too.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:51 pm
by gt4mike
PumpN wrote:
gt4mike wrote:Parker does have a point... and the auckland traffic could be classified as a disaster. The lost income of all the people sitting in their cars for hours each day would certainly build up to more than the recovery costs for these farms. I'm sure parker doesnt actually think we shouldnt help the farmers out, but I think he's just sticking it back in your face after your comments in the other thread.

Well done.


only an aucklander, im gonna shake my head and not go there .... i should give you all an earfull (apart from B1NZ cos he actually has a brain, one that works) but im gonna drop this and laugh at the both of you


So we should help bail you guys out, but you shouldn't help us out? Where's the logic in that?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:54 pm
by Parker
PumpN wrote:
gt4mike wrote:Parker does have a point... and the auckland traffic could be classified as a disaster. The lost income of all the people sitting in their cars for hours each day would certainly build up to more than the recovery costs for these farms. I'm sure parker doesnt actually think we shouldnt help the farmers out, but I think he's just sticking it back in your face after your comments in the other thread.

Well done.


only an aucklander, im gonna shake my head and not go there .... i should give you all an earfull (apart from B1NZ cos he actually has a brain, one that works) but im gonna drop this and laugh at the both of you


You do realise B1nZ has come off as a total retard right? You thinking he's smart makes you even lower on the food chain.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:54 pm
by Silent Knight
Yea i am an aucklander and i hvn't really noticed any big rize in the prices of meat and milk and shit. I really don't know wot you are on about Parker you bleedn' retard. Those ppl down there are in need. They've lost all they and you are too $&#$% stinge to help them out. Wot wud you do if a $&#$% tornado ripped through your backyard and destroys everything you own. Wouldn't you want someone to help you out? wot wud you if they said nah let him suffer cuz we had his driveway repaired.

Stop being a $&#$% wanker and start growing up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:57 pm
by Parker
Silent Knight wrote:Yea i am an aucklander and i hvn't really noticed any big rize in the prices of meat and milk and sh*t. I really don't know wot you are on about Parker you bleedn' retard. Those ppl down there are in need. They've lost all they and you are too f**kin stinge to help them out. Wot wud you do if a f**kin tornado ripped through your backyard and destroys everything you own. Wouldn't you want someone to help you out? wot wud you if they said nah let him suffer cuz we had his driveway repaired.

Stop being a f**kin wanker and start growing up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Tell ya what, write that out again in English and maybe i'll give you a proper reply. Until then i'll leave you with this. Just because mummy does the shopping for you doesn't mean the only thing that's rised in price is your nappies as they had to change from child to adult.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:06 pm
by Silent Knight
ah shame da poor baby cannot understand

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:12 pm
by Parker
Silent Knight wrote:ah shame da poor baby cannot understand


Obviously I can understand, but I don't see why I should bother if you aren't going to be bothered typing other than as if you had hooks for hands. I mean you spelt rise rize. It isn't even shorter! Go get your mum to change your nappies and come back when you type without using your tiny penis.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:20 pm
by zEpHyRiNe
I think the other thread indicated that the issue in Auckland arose because "everyone" decides to "drive" into the city at the same time. I believe this problem could be "solved" by "adequate" public transport. However, I don't believe a so-called "natural disaster" can be "solved" by adequate public transport.
In short, Parker: Take hold of your ears, and proceed to pull gently to remove your head from your ass.
End.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:22 pm
by Silent Knight
ok well i'm going to withdraw myself from pointless thread cuz you obviously are a complete dumbass looking for a pointless reason to stir shit.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:36 pm
by Parker
zEpHyRiNe wrote:I think the other thread indicated that the issue in Auckland arose because "everyone" decides to "drive" into the city at the same time. I believe this problem could be "solved" by "adequate" public transport. However, I don't believe a so-called "natural disaster" can be "solved" by adequate public transport.
In short, Parker: Take hold of your ears, and proceed to pull gently to remove your head from your ass.
End.


My head is clearly removed from my ass (not that it was ever there) , maybe you should try to remove the penis from yours.

It'd cost just as much of tax payers money to fix Auckland's public transport system. Do you know how much it'd cost to install a subway? Even if they did it would only apply to part of Auckland. Because of Aucklands original short sighted design it's a real pain in the ass to fix. People only choose to drive because they need to to survive. Those farmers chose to farm, no one held them at gun point, they chose to do it to survive. If they didn't chop down all the trees there probably wouldn't have been any floods, or to a much less extent anyway.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:37 pm
by Parker
Silent Knight wrote:ok well i'm going to withdraw myself from pointless thread cuz you obviously are a complete dumbass looking for a pointless reason to stir sh*t.


No sir, you are withdrawing because you got chopped out. Feel it.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:38 pm
by gt4mike
zEpHyRiNe wrote:I think the other thread indicated that the issue in Auckland arose because "everyone" decides to "drive" into the city at the same time. I believe this problem could be "solved" by "adequate" public transport. However, I don't believe a so-called "natural disaster" can be "solved" by adequate public transport.
In short, Parker: Take hold of your ears, and proceed to pull gently to remove your head from your ass.
End.


Public transport would be helpful, and thats exactly why the councils are trying to establish public transport systems in Auckland. With the current rate of growth and the fact that a public transport system will never suit everyone, the roads are still going to be really overloaded. Parker was obviously joking just to point out that Auckland money is being spent out of Auckland, and making a joking comparison to the flood incidents. I dont think you'd find anyone that would actually want the government not to help those people out! (unless of course it happened in Auckland :D )

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:53 pm
by voltage
haha we gona end up like korea or something.. a country split in two. Auckland.. and the rest of you hippies. haha
goddammit im stoned