Page 1 of 2
What do you think is faster
Posted:
Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:49 pm
by Inane
What do you think is faster??
(even better... what do you know is faster, provide proof!)
Posted:
Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:11 pm
by Emperor
Evo VIII MR
I'd say WRX is 2nd fastest, then GT4 Celica WRC 3rd.
Posted:
Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:44 pm
by the fallen303
depends on how your comparing them. 0-100k, 0-200k, 0-300k, quarter mile, lap times. also is this for stock cars, mild tune, or high tune?
narrow it down a bit.
still say the jza70 though, but thats just personal preferance
and proof, i know evo 6.5's aren't that great above 100k.... gave one a head start at 100k, and caught and past him before speed cut. (controlled conditions of course)
Posted:
Wed Aug 25, 2004 6:27 pm
by B1NZ
Evo 8, no contest!
Posted:
Wed Aug 25, 2004 7:04 pm
by 20vtoylevin
def evo 8!!!cool car even if it is a mitsi
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:29 pm
by XSVGT4
heres how i'd order them (got a few standard 1/4 miles from a japanese test, all cars standard):
1. wrx sti ver 5 (12.69)
2. evo 5 (12.74)
3. mr2 gts (13.50)
4. celica gt4 st205 (13.58 )
5. caldina gtt (13.97)
6. supra (14 something standard?)
7. levin (15 standard?)
8. touring wagon.... no idea
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:53 pm
by pplmvr
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:27 pm
by Silent Knight
i say MKIII supra but i'm really really biased towards them
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:52 pm
by WeNdY^cLeAr
I'd have to agree with you there Hanre, but yeah, you can guess why!
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:59 pm
by flygt4
hsahaha i say mk3 too , but only with the 1jz. they haul sum serious ass... if ur talkin bout corners tho the evo gotta have it
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:03 pm
by -Dan-Knee-
I'd have to say Supra in the straight line....
And the Evo 8 in like a corner/track battle...
My 2c worth...
Posted:
Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:28 pm
by Dell'Orto
Evo 8, with ease. Sad but true, awesome cars in stock trim with plenty of potential.
Posted:
Tue Sep 21, 2004 6:42 pm
by blackie
evo.
wrx is slow, unless you are referring to the STi.
the only mr2 turbo ive been in was extremely slow in comparison to an evo 3 i drove. both had similar mods, ie. 3inch exhaust etc, but the evo was running 12-14psi, the mr2 was stock, i think 10psi.
never been/driven one of those supras but guessing theyd be up there in the mix..
Posted:
Tue Sep 21, 2004 6:43 pm
by Sanxta
gotta be the evo!
Posted:
Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:05 pm
by Al
blackie wrote:evo.
wrx is slow, unless you are referring to the STi.
the only mr2 turbo ive been in was extremely slow in comparison to an evo 3 i drove. both had similar mods, ie. 3inch exhaust etc, but the evo was running 12-14psi, the mr2 was stock, i think 10psi.
never been/driven one of those supras but guessing theyd be up there in the mix..
Pay the $10 passenger fee at Ruapuna and I'll show you a 'quicker' mr2
Posted:
Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:24 pm
by Mr Revhead
hmm need to clarify soem things there.... like fast round a track? 1/4 mile? long drive??
and wheres the ae101 20v option??
Posted:
Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:14 pm
by blitza
so of course I voted for the G2T, however sadly, the evo gets it. where is the vote for the GT-R???
Posted:
Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:43 pm
by Snoozin
As much as I would really love to vote BZG-Touring wagon because they're just so damn fast
........
The Evo has it. They're simply the total package, especially nowadays. I would risk saying they would be the fastest in all of the abovementioned conditions as well.... track... 1/4 mile... rally... long drive as well.
Posted:
Sun Oct 10, 2004 3:48 pm
by CHOMPA
Obvioulsy the evo,
They are superior to all of these cars.
Theres no match.
Posted:
Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:31 am
by blackie
Al wrote:Pay the $10 passenger fee at Ruapuna and I'll show you a 'quicker' mr2
saw it a few months ago at rua..
pretty quick, good effort.