Toyspeed.org.nz Message Board

I'll start it off by casting one vote for no.

NOT GUILTY.

I believe he did it, but the crown failed to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. Reading between the lines of the questions the jury asked of the judge that seems be what they thought as well.

So the Not Guilty verdict is the only alternative that they had, so I guess it's right, but I hope he doesn't get any compensation.

i think he didnt, just would you real go this far to get out of something you did?

Im happy with the verdict as i dont believe he did it.

Agree from what point of view?

Did he or didnt he?
or
given the evidence provided do I agree with what the jury came up with?

After hearing the 111 phone call that made me think

holden_fan2005 wrote:After hearing the 111 phone call that made me thing

Ewwwwww

I dont believe i could make a decision on whether he is guilty or not as i havnt herd all the evidence other than what the media has said and i certainly dont trust the media. I think the only person who will really know is David himself

I'm sticking with my theory that Robin killed the family and David killed Robin.

Don't really care but I do thing that David should start a Jersey company! He'd make huge money .

At one point in the trial they made a description of the clothes he was wearing "A brightly coloured jersey that he designed himself and his mother knitted".

don't get me started on his red lunch box!

I think he did it but hes been pleading innocent for so long hes actually convinced himself that he is innocent too.

But I was not at the trail, and all I have to go on is media coverage, So I reserve my judgment, There are probably only 6 people that know for sure, 5 of them are dead!