Cosmetically speaking, which in your opinion is the better looking MR2? As a whole package, as is. Eg, no 'well, if this one had xxx mags, it's be better, so I'm voting for this...'
I like elements of both, I dont like the Tom's rear wing, but I do like how the rest of it is quite smooth.
Obviously I kinda like the Veilside kit too, though it would be better if the nose wasnt so long.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting 1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons 2018 Ranger - Because workcar 1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time OMG so shiny!
I'd have to go with the Tom's kit. I've been more a fan of the more subtle bodykits. The Veilside kit has too many sticky out bits, too much flare for my liking.
What I don't like about the Tom's kit is the wing however. I've always liked the SW20 with a spoiler and not without one, and that sort of seems inbetween...
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
both have good and bad points so i say both lol i very much dislike the veilside front but the rest of its ok LOL
toms is suttle but the front is a lil boring
Toms by a small margin - sllek and understated, though the rear soiler is a bit small. Veilside front is a bit much and the spoiler is in the shopping trolley catagory - but top effort to both owners - they are very good looking cars
GT Four Adovansu "I want to enjoy the powerful and nimble agility behavior."
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting 1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons 2018 Ranger - Because workcar 1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time OMG so shiny!
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.