SC-12 Max boost

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

SC-12 Max boost

Postby Volodkovich » Thu May 26, 2005 9:31 pm

Hi Everyone,

I was just wondering how a SC-12's coating on the rotors melt at around 10,000 rpm. Is this due to the heat of the boost its creating, or due to the supercharger spinning too fast?
What im actually trying to say is would this 10,000rpm limit apply for a smaller capacity engine running more boost? Or is the 10,000rpm blower rpm 'limit' set at the amount of boost it makes on a 4agze?
i.e. is it boost or blower rpm dependant?

Thanks, Rob
Volodkovich
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: ChCh

Postby Alex B » Thu May 26, 2005 11:58 pm

why would you want it to run at 10k they are more restritive than good at that level of revs anyway.
User avatar
Alex B
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6539
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 1:39 am
Location: London

Postby Volodkovich » Fri May 27, 2005 12:01 am

This isn't on a 4age, so it doesnt really apply like it would on one. I would like a high-ish redline without having to worry about melting the coatings on the rotors, while still having quite of boost throughout the rev range..
Volodkovich
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: ChCh

Postby matt dunn » Fri May 27, 2005 12:06 am

I think the spinning speed causes heat,

and the boost makes heat too.

At lower boost levels you may get it to spin faster ok but there will still be a limit.

Matt
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

Postby ants_ae92 » Fri May 27, 2005 2:56 pm

Hes not talking about engine rpm pyro_sniper2002.

Hes talking about rpm at the supercharger. The supercharger runs at 1.25 times the crank speed, So at 7k its actually spinning at 8750. And with a larger crank pulley, you are spinning it faster again.

I've heard more like 12000 rpm, but you would have to check, I think I saw that on a post here, try searching.

Alot of the guys recommend a front mount intercooler if you are upping the boost.
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1548
Current Ride: ae101 1997 White corolla BZ-touring station
Previous Rides: ae92 Levin (smallport 4age, Lowered, 17s, exhaust, intake). Ke70 Station wagon (4k, lowered)
User avatar
ants_ae92
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 9:15 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby Lanius » Fri May 27, 2005 4:28 pm

The charger becomes inefficient due to the heat it produces. It still provides boost throughout the rev range, but the heat of the intake charge negates any benefits of the boost. A supercharger is not the best option for power at high revs, no matter what CC rating your engine is. Fitting a front mount is an option to help combat the high temperatures, but you also suffer a "follow on" effect as the throttle is before the intercooler. This means airflow through the cooler keeps the engine running for a brief moment after you take your foot off the accelerator, which wouldn't be a problem if you've declutched, but its something to be aware of anyway.

Remember SC12s are more than 10 years old now ...

[EDIT: if you could find a way of cooling the entire SC12 unit (including the "vanes" inside), you may find a way to get the SC12 to be useable for the application you've described, but then you'll be looking at a more and more complex system. Keep it simple for reliability]
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby Volodkovich » Fri May 27, 2005 5:24 pm

i would have thought a waterspray on the intake to the SC would work well...help cool the vanes of the SC.

Was just looking at the HPC site, and apparently they make a coating for blower rotors, i thought it might be a good replacement for the fluorine resin coatings on SC-12's? Anyone tried this out? If they use it on blowers for V8's im sure it wouldnt melt at 14psi like the coating on sc12's do...
Volodkovich
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: ChCh

Postby Lanius » Sat May 28, 2005 10:38 am

Not sure of the size ratio between crank and charger pulleys on a V8, but I doubt they would spin as fast as an SC12.

Find a way of injecting NOS straight onto the vanes ... bet that would have some interesting results :wink:
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby Adamal » Sat May 28, 2005 11:22 am

Lanius wrote: A supercharger is not the best option for power at high revs


*COUGHCOUGHCOUGH*

Should say:

A ROOTS type supercharger is not the best option for power at high revs ;)
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Volodkovich » Sun May 29, 2005 11:07 pm

What does the coating on the vanes do anyway? The vanes don't actually touch, so what is the point in coating them in teflon?
Volodkovich
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: ChCh

Postby Lanius » Mon May 30, 2005 11:56 am

Adamal wrote:
Lanius wrote: A supercharger is not the best option for power at high revs


*COUGHCOUGHCOUGH*

Should say:

A ROOTS type supercharger is not the best option for power at high revs ;)


LOL ... the only "economically viable" model is the roots type. If I could make a cheap screw type, I'd be rich by now ;)
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby Adamal » Mon May 30, 2005 12:22 pm

Hmm... True. Screw tyes do cost arm and leg :D
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Lanius » Mon May 30, 2005 1:16 pm

Reckon ... would have stuck to my 4AGZEs instead of moving up to 3SGTEs if the screw types were cheap. I miss my instant boost :(
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby vvega » Mon May 30, 2005 1:24 pm

centrivicals arnt to expensive
and as for a roots
nothing wrong with them ethier you just need to size them right...as with everthin
vvega
 

Postby Lanius » Mon May 30, 2005 4:04 pm

vvega wrote:centrivicals arnt to expensive
and as for a roots
nothing wrong with them ethier you just need to size them right...as with everthin


I remember being told aaaages ago that the screw types were preferable as the boost was "constant" as opposed to coming in "pulses" as caused by the vanes on the charger.

I'd love to see the engine bay arrangement for fitting one of those archimedes screw types in ... imagine they'd take up a fair bit of room ...
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby Adamal » Mon May 30, 2005 7:03 pm

Actually, twin screw types are, a majority of the time, the most compact S/C's on the market.

Have a look at the measurements of the Whipple ones:
Heres the 3.3L displacer version
Image

Heres the 1.2L displacer, which they use in the PT Cruiser kit (2L engine):
Image
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Lanius » Tue May 31, 2005 9:13 am

Fark ... well there you go! To the original poster ... get yourself one of those puppies :D
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Postby Adamal » Tue May 31, 2005 9:29 am

HAH! You're talking some serious bling there! The 1.2L version would set you back about $2000 JUST for the S/C, and then you'd have to get the bypass valve system.
They're excellent superchargers though :)
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby vvega » Tue May 31, 2005 10:11 am

the millar cycle engine that mazda? produces has a good one on it
maybe you could look into that...i.e talk to some wreckers

v
vvega
 

Postby Lanius » Tue May 31, 2005 10:22 am

Adamal wrote:HAH! You're talking some serious bling there! The 1.2L version would set you back about $2000 JUST for the S/C, and then you'd have to get the bypass valve system.
They're excellent superchargers though :)


lol, I knew it would be either 1) too expensive, or 2) impossible to do :lol:
Lanius
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests