Touchy Subject but, The AE86 Status

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby vvega » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:49 pm

IMO its more because they dont want to get into machines liek teh e55
after all mass manufacture makes cars cheap
but throw somthing specail in there and you watch teh costs rocket

and at the end of the day
people that buy cars of that sort of value want things that japanses cars just dont offer

reality noone would turn up to a exclusive country club (one that costs 20-30k a year to join) in a god dam toyota

japa's offer no status none at all
and when you get into this field value for money isnt a valid reason

v
vvega
 

Postby Dell'Orto » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:55 pm

But how much of that "status" is because of the fact they cost so much? People of that kind of ilk tend to be snobby pricks who wont talk to you unless you're wearing a $3k suit.
I bet if some some reason the prices were reversed, they'd prefer TRD tweaked Century's over AMG Mercs.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby RS13 » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:01 pm

Hah, thats' partially because most New Zealanders have the mindset that anyone in a car with a BMW or Mercedes badge on the front, must be a wanker!

Snooty businessmen, and rich housewives aside, I love BMW's.. after going for a ride in an M3, for a 3.2L straight six.. I was shocked! I've been in some damn fast cars, but not many could touch this car! It was just as fast from 100km/h to 200km/h as it was from 0-100km/h! And could be thrown around any corner, at any rate of knots.. no understeer, oversteer on command.. just stunning. European car makers are light years ahead of the Japanese in terms of getting it right!

Its' just a damn shame, they're so freaking expensive!

scotts2hot wrote:I honestly can't understand people saying that their dream car is a an ae-86.. it's a corolla! Have something to aspire to guys!


Hahah!
Daily driver: Toyota RunX/Toyota Caldina
Ex: 2x AE101, 5x KP60, KP61, EP71, 3x KE70, KE72, AE70, AE82, 2x TE71, AE90, AE92, ST170, plus 11 Hondas, 12 Nissans, 6 Fords, 4 Mazdas, 3 Mitsis, an Isuzu and a Lada!

Image
User avatar
RS13
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby vvega » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:23 pm

Mmm, Boost wrote:But how much of that "status" is because of the fact they cost so much? People of that kind of ilk tend to be snobby pricks who wont talk to you unless you're wearing a $3k suit.
I bet if some some reason the prices were reversed, they'd prefer TRD tweaked Century's over AMG Mercs.


trd cant do anything to even touch e55 man

picture this
your on teh autobarn cruzing at 260 km/h in your e55
and you feel like you need a burst of speed so you give it a jab on the gas
and bang you hit speed cut at 280 km/h
just as fast as if you were in a evo doing 160 and then tring to hit speed cut

thats where your money is
and remeber
this is a family car
it has a plush ride
heated seats
comparmental aircon
tv and dvd player
a KICK ARSE stereo
has dinner sized brakes and 6 pots
and can smoke the bags at will

all this and its stock

yeah i can see why you would wanna buy a jappa instead

lol
v
vvega
 

Postby deaf_rattle » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:25 pm

Image

would like to see a standard jappa keep up with this badboy
User avatar
deaf_rattle
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 8039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 1:32 pm
Location: right where he belongs

Postby Punter » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:29 pm

^^^ I've always love 840's, not all that expensive now days either.
Last edited by Punter on Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Punter
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Akl CBD

Postby deaf_rattle » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:30 pm

find one of those models tho :wink:
User avatar
deaf_rattle
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 8039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 1:32 pm
Location: right where he belongs

Postby vvega » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:33 pm

i drove a 750 csi a few years back for a week
man what a car

v
vvega
 

Postby Punter » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:34 pm

Is this one??

I can't tell from the photo.
User avatar
Punter
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Akl CBD

Postby deaf_rattle » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:35 pm

850csi
Image

bling bling
User avatar
deaf_rattle
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 8039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 1:32 pm
Location: right where he belongs

Postby TRD Man » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:14 am

vvega wrote:sory there but the celica started life RWD

That's irrelevant. The ST160 series were FWD cars.

vvega wrote:i also belive that teh st160 and 165 came out around teh same time, earliest st160 ive seen is 1986 and the earliest 165 ive seen is also 86

The ST160 began production in July 1985. The ST165 began in Oct 1986.
It is fair to assume that the ST165 is an adapted ST160

vvega wrote: all that still dosent make it a classic

No it wouldn't. The ST165 might qualify as a classic because of it's motorsport achievements. Being the 1st Japanese 4WD car to compete with the Europeans on an even footing and then beating them. Being a World Rally championship winning car perhaps.

vvega wrote:it is what the masses think
one man or in this case a small cult group cannot call a car a classic

The point I'm making & you're missing is that the term classic is nothing more than a word in the English language that has reasonably clear definitions. It is not an exclusive club. It is not a measure of performance or quality or popularity. Or of country of origin.
You are correct in saying that one man cannot determine that a car is a classic. But neither can the masses. History determines it.
If a car has historical significance then it is a classic.
It matters not whether it's a good car, a bad car, a boring car. Whether people like it or not. Whether it's made from plastic or tin or elephant turds.
If it has historical significance it is a classic. End of story.
And as much as one man, or the masses, cannot determine classic eligibility neither can one man, nor the masses, deny it.

vvega wrote: there really nothing specail about the ae-86 friom a engineering pont of view

You're quite correct here. It is probably on a par with a BDA Escort but arrived 10 years later so nothing special there.

vvega wrote: aside from winning a few races what makes teh ae-86 so specail as to deam it a classic ??

Well, winning a few races is a factor. As are who it was raced by, who drove it, where & when. What it represented. What it brought to, not only motorsport, but motoring or motoring enthusiasts (even if they are only lowly Toyota enthusiasts) in general.
User avatar
TRD Man
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Postby Mad Murphy » Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:02 pm

I think the AE86 is a classic to some extent, but definately more of a cult classic. At the end of the day it didn't really offer anything that hadn't been done before and it's still a Corolla. Personally I like them but I'd rather have my MR2 than an AE86 (stock one anyway).
1989 Supercharged AW11, 1981 Sprinter GT, 1991 Primera s**tmobile.

Facelift AW11 Parts Wanted!
User avatar
Mad Murphy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Rolleston

Postby vvega » Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:56 pm

you missed teh point
whats teh historical significance of the ae-86
what landmark did it make to make it historical ??

point is your calling it a classic
and im not

im asking for your reasoning and your not providing anythign to convince me that its any differnt from every other mass produced car

and depends on what your claming classic means

is it a classic for you ??
or is it a classic for everyone

and sorry but if nobody thinks soimethign is classic then it will be forgoton and therfore has no historical significance
IMO its not
and thats what your missing
i dont have to agree with you
i dont have to follow what you say

im simply expressing that i can see no reason to justafie that is a classic car
im not missing any points your just failing to see that i siimply dont agree with you and no amount of end of storys or telling me how you think it is is gunna change that fact

oh and please dont compare a ae-86 with a bda
thats just insulting to somthign that has real racing heratage and is a true classic
theres no prizes for last place and 10 years to late by your own admission woudl surly make it a loser

just my thoughts
take it or leave it

v
vvega
 

Postby no_8wire » Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:59 pm

I like Toyotas...but if some one offered me a F40....well yeah what can you say? A real sports car... 8)


frost wrote:vvega wrote;
"these cars set the standerds of there era i cannot say the ae-86 did this"
"its just a cheap mass manufactured sports car"


thats Exactly whats the ae86 did! they where a mass produced sporty car that most ppl could afford, they where the first 16valve mass produced engined car that as available to the public. and yes ae86 was the first car to have the 4age, yes the cosworth 16valve was almost the same engine(in design) but could anyone get ahold of one? NO.

What about the 84 AW11's?... :wink:


popular car...classic to some, but not to all...

I mean the Model T is a classic...everyone regards it as such...

But a ae86...mmm
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby vvega » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:05 pm

yeah i thought the aw11 got the 4age first......

v
vvega
 

Postby HELBND » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:22 pm

EDIT - bah... foiled by lack of information :lol: :lol: :lol:
Last edited by HELBND on Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
HELBND
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1578
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Xyrath 86 » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:34 pm

AE86 came out in 83 :wink:.
User avatar
Xyrath 86
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 792
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:52 pm

Postby deaf_rattle » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:02 pm

no_8wire wrote:I like Toyotas...but if some one offered me a F40....well yeah what can you say? A real sports car... 8)




fore shore and seabed. id do an f40
User avatar
deaf_rattle
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 8039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 1:32 pm
Location: right where he belongs

Postby vvega » Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:21 pm

Xyrath 86 wrote:AE86 came out in 83 :wink:.


lol just found out :)

lol
vvega
 

Postby TRD Man » Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:16 am

vvega wrote:oh and please dont compare a ae-86 with a bda
thats just insulting to somthign that has real racing heratage and is a true classic

Don't preach to me about BDA's buddy. I owned one. Have you?
We rallied Escorts in the 70's. I loved them. In fact I believe I owned about a dozen in different guises throughout that time.
They were troublesome buggers though so we switched to Datsuns, tried a couple of Mazda's and then settled on Toyota's.

The comparison that I made with the BDA was purely to do with it's mechanical makeup. The AE86 is every bit the equal of a BDA in that respect. That's all.

Like you, I find the AE86 lacking in character/charisma. I've never been sufficiently enthused about the model to either own none or race one. I believe I've already said that.

In fact, there's a lot, about which, I agree with you. I'm a Euro fan too. I've owned a couple of Porsches & my wife drives a 328 M/Sport (her third such model). There's certainly a distinct difference in quality and I can't see the Japs catching up anytime soon..

Be that as it may, the AE86 has a place in history that would justify classic status. What you & I think doesn't matter. I can accept that. Is your ego too big to allow you to accept that too?
User avatar
TRD Man
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests