Moderator: The Mod Squad
s0cks wrote:However, I will still take both for a run as I may be pleasently surprised.
RunningRich wrote:You realise asking the difference between a Honda and a Toyota on a Toyota forum won't exactly give you the most unbias answer in the world?
They are quite different cars and made for very different markets. One is made for rallying, one is a hyped up road racer. Sure the Celica is heavier (but no heavier than a new EVO), but it will be a hell of a lot more solid in the body and in construction. This has the advantage that on the open road it ticks like glue, being very stable at speed. The downside is that is is heavier when taking off from the lights.
The GT-Four is not a city car and it does not pretend to be. It is made to do a long drive on the open road in terrible weather at high speeds effortlessly.
The ITR is fast but you have to be willing to scream its nuts off to do so. Do you want to have to do that all the way from AKL - WLG? Think you will still be able to walk when you get there?!
Want an easy to drive shopping cart to parade at stop lights? Get the ITR. Want a car capable of very high speeds with a bit more exclusivity? GT-Four.
300 bhp (and the torque to go with it, something an ITR will never have) is an exhaust change away on the ST205. Don't believe people that knock the GT-Fours handling, good shocks and springs are all it needs, the superstrut front being very precise (don't believe me compare it to a ST165!). I trust you have seen the size of the brakes and I don't need to mention them!
Want a car to drive in AKL traffic every day? ITR may be better suited, uprated clutches in a GT-Four can be heavy.
And yes I have a ST205, have had GT-Fours for over a decade, so I'm biased to!
s0cks wrote:Haha! Mixed opions here then.
I'm leaning towards a ITR. Perhaps I should mention that I'm really not in it for straight line speed. The "NUMBER 1" priority for anycar I have would be FUN! And the Trueno just doesn't cut it in that department.
I have a feeling that the teg, with big recaro bucket seats, no sound deadening, hugely fun high revving engine (i love vtec) will be more suited to my style of driving. It is also good on fuel economy. The downside is FWD, but they are supposed to be the best handling FWD cars made and I don't plan on throwing it around in the wet, or go rallying - lol.
However, I will still take both for a run as I may be pleasently surprised.
avinesh wrote:s0cks wrote:Haha! Mixed opions here then.
I'm leaning towards a ITR. Perhaps I should mention that I'm really not in it for straight line speed. The "NUMBER 1" priority for anycar I have would be FUN! And the Trueno just doesn't cut it in that department.
I have a feeling that the teg, with big recaro bucket seats, no sound deadening, hugely fun high revving engine (i love vtec) will be more suited to my style of driving. It is also good on fuel economy. The downside is FWD, but they are supposed to be the best handling FWD cars made and I don't plan on throwing it around in the wet, or go rallying - lol.
However, I will still take both for a run as I may be pleasently surprised.
mr2 turbos are fun as well i had a vtec integra quite modifyed now i drive a turbo mr2 an i got to say its just as fun if not more then the teg an also quiker with only a lil bit of mods.....
Brick wrote:BZG|Bling wrote:S15
mmmmmmm
ive told you from the start your soft
bluemaumau wrote:mr2s!?
im pretty sure theres more mr2s than gt4s man. esp 205s
bluemaumau wrote:mr2s!?
im pretty sure theres more mr2s than gt4s man. esp 205s
smithers wrote:Why noy buy my car?
Better then both..
PUT TOGETHER
- in forsale section
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests