Moderator: The Mod Squad
i think i saw that on a tui billboard somewhere. perhaps you mean like starwars: a gallaxy in the future, far far away.IH8TEC wrote:there will be a few of us needing this, i will in the near future
BZG|Bling wrote:flygt4 wrote:edit: would affect mr2's as well?
Only if you do your run in reverse
IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?
snwtoy wrote:IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?
Yeah, if they've been incorrectly lightened they can be prone to that, especially if you're running a ceramic clutch which heats the hell out of them so they develop cracks.
BZG|Bling wrote:flygt4 wrote:edit: would affect mr2's as well?
Only if you do your run in reverse
IH8TEC wrote:5.40 all front wheel drive OR transverse mounted.
IH8TEC wrote:i'm gonna have a talk to dean at work tomorrow, but what is the difference between say a s2000 that revs to 9.5k and might run a high 12, compared to say barry's car that goes to 8k and does a 10. are they basing this decision on rpm the cars get to? (ie rotaries), where do they draw the line....
rotaries i can understand as they rev pretty damn high some of them. and are KNOWN to go.
has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?
i dont get that they put in that rule, yet have no specifics on what grade material it should be, what thickness it should be, no diagrams of where exactly it's meant to cover.
so many questions, not enough answers lol
IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?
flygt4 wrote:what i don't get is, what is the difference between a transverse engined car running under 12sec and a longitudal engined car runinng less than 12sec? (other than around 10mph :lol: )
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests