Opinions - series 1 rx7 kit

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Skin » Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:36 am

cogent wrote:
Adydas wrote:That second one looks great, my mate recently got a S4 with a 13bT andi can see why rotarys can be somewhat addictive to some people..


Hey man hows he finding that? I miss it heaps, lol :(


Lol, im looking at getting a auto series 4 for the mrs. Would rather spend money on that that her MR2 :lol:
cogent wrote:iPhones can eat a dick.


1981 Mazda RX7
1997 Toyota Corolla
User avatar
Skin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1438
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 12:33 pm
Location: Perth, aussieland

Postby Mr Revhead » Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:40 am

she will hate the gas bill :lol:
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Adamal » Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:46 am

Nuty|Mike wrote:it goes good over 300kw on 8psi just the gearbos isnt liking the power good fun tho


Thats what I love about the 20b's, you get pretty big numbers for very little boost.

Only problem is that your gas tank isn't very full for long :D
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:33 am

Mr Revhead wrote:she will hate the gas bill :lol:


They're not that bad, my S4 used pretty similar amounts of fuel as my SW20 did. When I went to the 2000 rotary nats, I used $220 in fuel ($1.279 p/l) and covered 1500k's with 3 people and gear in the car. Not driving nicely either!
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby darkwolf » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:14 pm

That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.

Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.
User avatar
darkwolf
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: CHCH Nearly

Postby Skin » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:32 pm

darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


Its not that bad really. That would of been around 172 litres of fuel, or around 3 tanks at 57litres a tank. So 500km out of a tank is pretty good for a rotary. My old bat got 600km to a tank, though they have over 70litre tanks :lol:
cogent wrote:iPhones can eat a dick.


1981 Mazda RX7
1997 Toyota Corolla
User avatar
Skin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1438
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 12:33 pm
Location: Perth, aussieland

Postby Mr Revhead » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:36 pm

rotarys are economical
YEAH RIGHT!
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Skin » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:49 pm

Mr Revhead wrote:rotarys are economical
YEAH RIGHT!


I never said that. Just they arent as bad as people think they are. :wink:
cogent wrote:iPhones can eat a dick.


1981 Mazda RX7
1997 Toyota Corolla
User avatar
Skin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1438
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 12:33 pm
Location: Perth, aussieland

Postby Mr Revhead » Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:52 pm

no, they're worse 8O


:twisted:
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:14 pm

darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


I also bet you didnt spend a large majority of those k's well and truly over the speed limit either ;) And yup, it was something like 500+ k's to a tank. Also not forgetting with 280kg's of people ballast and probably another 100kgs in luggage...I didn't think it was all that bad.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby cogent » Tue Dec 25, 2007 10:19 pm

I find they are 'good' on gas, except they are quite sensitive to load.
I get about an extra 100ks if the majority of driving is done with just me in the car, you can tell the differance in the mileage the moment someone else is in the car.

Just recently myself, my mate and two pcs plus monitors went from paekak hill to whitby to the portlan hotel back out to paekak hill and used almost half a tank.

This is in a series 7 bat.

I average around 500-550kms on a tank btw, usually filling about 65litres in it. I dont really thrash it though, too much of a noob driver to really throw it round, and its too damn expensive to crash! I AM with NAC afterall... :roll:
cogent
 

Postby darkwolf » Tue Dec 25, 2007 10:58 pm

Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


I also bet you didnt spend a large majority of those k's well and truly over the speed limit either ;) And yup, it was something like 500+ k's to a tank. Also not forgetting with 280kg's of people ballast and probably another 100kgs in luggage...I didn't think it was all that bad.


Two passengers - no luggage - celica.

Was fair pushing it most of the way too. but nm a little o/t.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.

Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.
User avatar
darkwolf
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: CHCH Nearly

Postby Dell'Orto » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:45 am

darkwolf wrote:
Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


I also bet you didnt spend a large majority of those k's well and truly over the speed limit either ;) And yup, it was something like 500+ k's to a tank. Also not forgetting with 280kg's of people ballast and probably another 100kgs in luggage...I didn't think it was all that bad.


Two passengers - no luggage - celica.

Was fair pushing it most of the way too. but nm a little o/t.


15k p/l...thats pretty impressive economy, my wagon doesnt even get that.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:27 pm

bugger all gets that :?
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby flygt4 » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:13 pm

Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:
Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


I also bet you didnt spend a large majority of those k's well and truly over the speed limit either ;) And yup, it was something like 500+ k's to a tank. Also not forgetting with 280kg's of people ballast and probably another 100kgs in luggage...I didn't think it was all that bad.


Two passengers - no luggage - celica.

Was fair pushing it most of the way too. but nm a little o/t.


15k p/l...thats pretty impressive economy, my wagon doesnt even get that.


to take it more off topic , our caldina GT does ~14km/l on 98 if you nana it. 15km/l in a celica without the 4wd power loss would be possible but you'd have to be pretty careful with it.

and yeah apparently rotaries aren't as bad on fuel as people say, i believe its more when you modify them they get bad, as with any modified car. probly to do with the way people drive them too :wink:
User avatar
flygt4
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby Skin » Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:39 pm

flygt4 wrote:
Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:
Dell'Orto wrote:
darkwolf wrote:That's a huge bill. I didn't realise rotors were that hungry. I just did 1400Km on $160. As in yesterday and saturday.


I also bet you didnt spend a large majority of those k's well and truly over the speed limit either ;) And yup, it was something like 500+ k's to a tank. Also not forgetting with 280kg's of people ballast and probably another 100kgs in luggage...I didn't think it was all that bad.


Two passengers - no luggage - celica.

Was fair pushing it most of the way too. but nm a little o/t.


15k p/l...thats pretty impressive economy, my wagon doesnt even get that.


to take it more off topic , our caldina GT does ~14km/l on 98 if you nana it. 15km/l in a celica without the 4wd power loss would be possible but you'd have to be pretty careful with it.

and yeah apparently rotaries aren't as bad on fuel as people say, i believe its more when you modify them they get bad, as with any modified car. probly to do with the way people drive them too :wink:


Exactly. Porting them makes them alot thirstier, the bigger port the worse it gets.

Again O/T, but i only got 500km out of the last tank from my company car(1zzfe powered fielder). Thats about 40litres :? That was mostly open road driving as well.

Its running on 91, so just filled up with 95 and see if it gets better milage.
cogent wrote:iPhones can eat a dick.


1981 Mazda RX7
1997 Toyota Corolla
User avatar
Skin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1438
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 12:33 pm
Location: Perth, aussieland

Postby SIKBUZ » Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:44 am

LOL i'll let you know what i get when my modified FD is back on the road :)
User avatar
SIKBUZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:28 pm

Postby barryogen » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:50 pm

Skin wrote:Again O/T, but i only got 500km out of the last tank from my company car(1zzfe powered fielder). Thats about 40litres :? That was mostly open road driving as well.


Again OT...
Fielder tank should be 50 if it's the same as the corolla/runx.
The 2zzge in my runx gets ~500km/45l round town, and 750-800km/45L on a trip

Very heavy foot takes that down to 360 round town and 450 trip though.
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby Skin » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:56 pm

barryogen wrote:
Skin wrote:Again O/T, but i only got 500km out of the last tank from my company car(1zzfe powered fielder). Thats about 40litres :? That was mostly open road driving as well.


Again OT...
Fielder tank should be 50 if it's the same as the corolla/runx.
The 2zzge in my runx gets ~500km/45l round town, and 750-800km/45L on a trip

Very heavy foot takes that down to 360 round town and 450 trip though.


Was on the empty line yesterday when i filled it, and had to top up past the gas nozzle clicking off to get it to 40 litres. It may have a capacity of more than that, but it seems to only get 40 useable litres out of it.

Even so, i should be getting more mileage than your car. Not that it bothers me that much - gotta love free gas :lol:
cogent wrote:iPhones can eat a dick.


1981 Mazda RX7
1997 Toyota Corolla
User avatar
Skin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1438
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 12:33 pm
Location: Perth, aussieland

Postby SIKBUZ » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:54 pm

Any word on a new RX Skin???
User avatar
SIKBUZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:28 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 52 guests