MAGN1T wrote:Aftermarket ECUs are a downgrade.
Good for a wind up, you guys are easy.
Steve
Not another one of those are you?
Moderator: The Mod Squad
MAGN1T wrote:Aftermarket ECUs are a downgrade.
Good for a wind up, you guys are easy.
Steve
MAGN1T wrote:Good for a wind up, you guys are easy.
Steve
Silent Knight wrote:MAGN1T wrote:Good for a wind up, you guys are easy.
Steve
Awesome, haven't heard that excuse to try and cover up stupidity in a long time!
Py7h0n wrote:MAGN1T wrote:If your car is tuned properly then your mods won't increase the fuel consumption.
HAHAAHAH Yea right!
Please explain then how my supra now only manages 250km off 60L of fuel and when I bought it it was doing aroun 450km off 60L.
MAGN1T wrote:The best dyno tune is never the best tune for the road.
Likewise the best road tune never gets the best numbers on the dyno.
A dyno tune is pretty much 2 dimentional as in rpms/full throttle only/power. It takes a lot of time for a proper tune, with part throttle conditions.
That's on a car making a bit more than 300Kw 4WD at the hubs, but not a Toyota, no we weren't driving slowly either.
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
MAGN1T wrote:If your car is tuned properly then your mods won't increase the fuel consumption.
Steve
Adydas wrote:So beacuse my cars tuned by a tuner the fact its been tuned to run bigger injectors, bigger turbo etc it wont use more fuel?
Adydas wrote:As far as im concerned ive done work to my car, been instructed to use 96 and i just expect it will use more gas. My vote supports the power triangle.
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Affroman wrote:"To make horsepower, work must be done"
burning more fuel makes more power. right?
As everyone reading, to a point. as, consider this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests