Toyota's reliability becoming a concern?

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Toyota's reliability becoming a concern?

Postby darkwolf » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:16 am

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/motoring/news ... d=10543528

Running only 3rd in the UK for reliability. Though it does say from commercial fleets and they do say that the fastest car is a rental car. So how typical the results are could be open to speculation.

Was surprised to see honda doing so well. But then I guess it takes a while for rust to set in :lol:
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.

Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.
User avatar
darkwolf
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: CHCH Nearly

Postby TazzieDevil » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:42 am

Imagine though, you were leasing a car for work.

Would you thrash a BMW as much as you would a Honda or Toyota?

The German company's 3-Series range - its biggest seller - has been voted the most reliable car in a study of Britain's vehicle leasing companies, edging out the Toyota Avensis and Honda Accord.


My dad works for Custom Fleet here in wellington, the cars that come back are munted! Scrapes, dings, torn upholstery etc. Whats worse is they try and fix these things cheap, so they don't get charged when they bring it back, but they get charged to fix the fix up, cause its so crap :p
Get In, Sit Down, Shut Up & Hold On
TS Profile
It wasn't Me, it was the one armed Man!
User avatar
TazzieDevil
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 5:20 pm
Location: Rua Massif reprezent!

Postby darkwolf » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:48 am

TazzieDevil wrote:Imagine though, you were leasing a car for work.

Would you thrash a BMW as much as you would a Honda or Toyota?

The German company's 3-Series range - its biggest seller - has been voted the most reliable car in a study of Britain's vehicle leasing companies, edging out the Toyota Avensis and Honda Accord.


Of course you would.... nt. I can't imagine a BMW company car being given to a young'un either. It'd more likely be given to the older / more respectable types. The toyota's etc would be given to the younger / more foolish types.

That's what I mean. It's all just statistics. It doesn't even say what it considered a repair to be or the severity of the repairs. Toyota - a bulb needed replaced. Honda - Engine exploded at 4K RPM sending conrod through bonnet.

It also doesn't mention how many KMs each car had done. I can't imagine people driving as far in their BMWs compared to the Toyota or getting used as much during the day. I.E. cold starts stop start driving etc.

I could take results like that and make a Lada look more reliable.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.

Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.
User avatar
darkwolf
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: CHCH Nearly

Postby Leon » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:05 am

With what they pay me, I'm always far more interested in how reliable a car is when it is 15 years old, than when it is one year old :lol:
User avatar
Leon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6642
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Wellington

Re: Toyota's reliability becoming a concern?

Postby Girvs » Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:46 pm

darkwolf wrote:Was surprised to see honda doing so well. But then I guess it takes a while for rust to set in :lol:


Why so so surprised? Honda makes a very good range of cars and have a positive record for reliability.
While both companies have created cars which have had on occasions had inherited mechanical faults, it would still not detract me from chosing a Honda over a Toyota if I intended to buy a 4 cylinder engine and needed a bit of guts to it.
User avatar
Girvs
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: So glad not to be in Auckland

Re: Toyota's reliability becoming a concern?

Postby darkwolf » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:33 pm

Girvs wrote:
darkwolf wrote:Was surprised to see honda doing so well. But then I guess it takes a while for rust to set in :lol:


Why so so surprised? Honda makes a very good range of cars and have a positive record for reliability.
While both companies have created cars which have had on occasions had inherited mechanical faults, it would still not detract me from chosing a Honda over a Toyota if I intended to buy a 4 cylinder engine and needed a bit of guts to it.


I've heard seen numerous hondas with terrible electrics and issues with rust. Also the one or two that I have driven have been awful to drive. No power until you revved the stink outta them. I could only describe the handling as funny and not in a good way.

I do have a lot of respect for their engines its just a shame that they can't do anything about the things that surround the engine. At least in my experiences. I'd have a honda 1600cc over a 4A-GE but then I'm not fond of the 4A-ge anyway. *waits for things to stop being thrown at him* I don't see the appeal of throwing loads of money at an engine that is already hampered by a comparitively low power to weight ratio anyway, from cars that don't have the engine room for a larger engine.

I've never personally owned one, but have a couple of acquaintances who have/do. I've never been impressed either way with them.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.

Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.
User avatar
darkwolf
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: CHCH Nearly

Postby Snoozin » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:29 pm

Once I drove a 1983 Accord with 310,000km on the clock. No power even if you revved it, and it handled funnier than Monty Python played at twice the speed.

Yup, Honda's pretty much suck.
User avatar
Snoozin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 6:35 pm
Location: Bribing WOF Testers.....

Postby snwtoy » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:21 pm

TazzieDevil wrote:Would you thrash a BMW as much as you would a Honda or Toyota?


In the uk, where the study was done there's more euro's than jappas. Jappas are the exotics over there, so yes, yes you would be thrashing your bmw.
User avatar
snwtoy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5810
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby shihad » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:10 pm

Once I drove a 1983 Accord with 310,000km on the clock. No power even if you revved it, and it handled funnier than Monty Python played at twice the speed.

Yup, Honda's pretty much suck.


you drove a car thats 24 years old and high kms what were you expecting?
and based on this experience every car honda produces sucks?

Im not a fan of most honda's but come on thats a bit ruff isn't it.
getting bottled by the friendly Oamaru locals for not doing skids - Coupe Life
User avatar
shihad
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:02 am
Location: dunedin in the winter gizzy in the summer

Postby Si » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:16 pm

I wonder if the BMWs having the "Im going to flash at you till you get me serviced at an authorised service center" feature forces them to get better maintance than the others?
Current: , '96 SubaruImpreza
Previous: '92 EE80 Corolla, '91 JZZ30 Soarer(The single snail whale), '91 AE92 FXGT(Silvertop 20v), '92 JZA70 MkIIISupra (The twin snail whale), '82 MkV Cortina.
User avatar
Si
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1304
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Wellywood

Postby Rob_GTZ » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:18 pm

shihad wrote:
Once I drove a 1983 Accord with 310,000km on the clock. No power even if you revved it, and it handled funnier than Monty Python played at twice the speed.

Yup, Honda's pretty much suck.


you drove a car thats 24 years old and high kms what were you expecting?
and based on this experience every car honda produces sucks?

Im not a fan of most honda's but come on thats a bit ruff isn't it.


Switch on your sarcasm detector Batman
Rob_GTZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 682
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 4:22 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby Bling » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:39 pm

So to update:

Snoozin: 1
shihad: 0

:lol:
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby rollaholic » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:04 pm

honda build brilliant NA cars, alot of their older stuff was very rusty (maybe even more so that toyotas - which are pretty bad too) but newer hondas (like 98ish onwards) are fantastic cars. if i were to suddenly turn into a family man (lol) and needed a semi respectable vehicle, something like a euro R would be streets ahead of the equivalent toyota. (camry sportivo? rofls) type R integras have been the business since day one too.
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby Sh0ckwave » Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:25 am

Have to agree with rollaholic, the newer hondas are great cars. My parents have an 01 Torneo and an 01 Stream, they both go very well for what they are.
User avatar
Sh0ckwave
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:51 am
Location: South Auckland

Postby toymato » Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:32 am

I had an '85 accord from 10ks to 170ks, and it was incredibly reliable. The drivetrain never missed a beat.

The body, however, had to get rust taken out from under both front and rear windscreens. The guys did a good job, and the rust never returned.
User avatar
toymato
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:04 am
Location: Porirua

Postby Timmo » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:35 am

haha Toyota 'slips' to number 3 in one survey and its 'Toyotas reliability is a concern'?!

Anything in the top 5 isn't exactly going to be a dog reliability wise.
Lightweight baby
1991 MX5 Supercharged
Timmo
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Tauranga/Mount

Postby shihad » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:52 am

Switch on your sarcasm detector Batman

Batman: Confoudit, the batteries are dead Robin.





Batman: This nasty soup we're in is largely of my own brewing.
getting bottled by the friendly Oamaru locals for not doing skids - Coupe Life
User avatar
shihad
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:02 am
Location: dunedin in the winter gizzy in the summer

Postby Lith » Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:25 am

Timmo wrote:haha Toyota 'slips' to number 3 in one survey and its 'Toyotas reliability is a concern'?!


My thoughts exactly. The top 5 could easily also have been hard to decide between... older Hondas used to rust, but mechanically I've never found them to be a problem. Hondas so far have been the most reliable cars I have owned!
2007 Mazdaspeed Axela
User avatar
Lith
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3137
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 5:22 pm
Location: Kapiti

Postby Mr.Phreak » Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:02 pm

Yet in the latest Autocar they claim that Suzuki is the most reliable in the UK, while Toyota takes the crown worldwide.

Lies, damned lies, and statistics......
Image
User avatar
Mr.Phreak
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby skoty » Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:22 pm

As far as I'm concerned our Toyota Hilux work utes are tough and reliable.

Toyotas I've owned have been reliable

My mates Toyotas they have owned have been reliable

Other people I talk to say there Toyotas are reliable

So I don't think there is really much to worry about :roll: Sure there are going to be occasional faults like anything but generally speaking they are pretty impressive.
Profile - Cars Owned - AE82 Corolla GT / Corolla Dirt Track Car / N14 Pulsar GTI / S14 Silvia Qs / Nissan Van / Nissan Avenir GT

Current cars - Altezza RS200 and Mitsi Lancer GSR
User avatar
skoty
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 10:33 am
Location: Auckland

Next

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests