st205 openions/feedback owners/ ex-owners

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Lith » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:24 pm

sergei wrote:That applies to internal. Flow dynamics is not simple subject.
But roughly speaking there is some venturi effect on the wastegate ports (from inside the turbine housing of course) when there is low pressure after turbine wheel .
See on the CT20b the ports are drilled at 90' into the housing, having also a narrowing in there and faster than designed gas flow would cause reduction in flow of through the wastegate ports.


Appreciate the link to Wikipedia, I kinda understand venturi effect already....... low pressure is a relative term. Do you think the pressure behind the turbine is lower than atmospheric pressure, or just lower than in the turbine housing?

The turbo doesn't spin at a constant relative speed to the engine either, it has an actuator which allows it to pump more air until a measured pressure level is reached before it starts the gases bypassing.

The only disadvantage I can think of putting a big exhaust on a GT4 is that you end up hearing 3SGTE noises.
2007 Mazdaspeed Axela
User avatar
Lith
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3137
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 5:22 pm
Location: Kapiti

Postby dnalunchie » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:36 pm

lolz dont worry i imagine evo 2's arnt as reliable anyway
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby iOnic » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:36 pm

dnalunchie wrote:hey guys I hate to throw a curve ball into the mix but how would an evo two line up against the chaser/205? in terms of performance and reliability?


in factory form they're about the same in a straight line with the evo coming out on top

reliability.......depends on how it's been looked after (the average evo 2 will have been raped to hell and back)
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby dnalunchie » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:39 pm

iOnic wrote:
dnalunchie wrote:hey guys I hate to throw a curve ball into the mix but how would an evo two line up against the chaser/205? in terms of performance and reliability?


in factory form they're about the same in a straight line with the evo coming out on top

reliability.......depends on how it's been looked after (the average evo 2 will have been raped to hell and back)


so all the EVO EVO EVO hype is over rated? I heard that they do like 12's factory?
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby xsspeed » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:39 pm

Try finding a factory standard early evo might be hard though
xsspeed
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby dnalunchie » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:41 pm

xsspeed wrote:Try finding a factory standard early evo might be hard though


hmmm i guess ill stick with the st205
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby iOnic » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:44 pm

dnalunchie wrote:so all the EVO EVO EVO hype is over rated? I heard that they do like 12's factory?


They are actually a good package - it's not all hype, people buy them because they certainly get results (the gt4 fanboy brigade led by sergei will swear black and blue that the gt4 is a better car in many ways...and it probably is - but out-of-the-box performance isn't one of those ways).....at the time there was nothing that came close in that class of vehicle. Early evos don't do 12's factory....but they don't take much to get there either......a good clutch, slight boost increase, exhaust and a lack of mechanical sympathy will get you there fairly quickly - it's no coincidence that the 10sec club is now saturated with evo's all running their factory drivetrain :lol: they're built like brick shithouses under there
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby dnalunchie » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:52 pm

iOnic wrote:
dnalunchie wrote:so all the EVO EVO EVO hype is over rated? I heard that they do like 12's factory?


They are actually a good package - it's not all hype, people buy them because they certainly get results (the gt4 fanboy brigade led by sergei will swear black and blue that the gt4 is a better car in many ways...and it probably is - but out-of-the-box performance isn't one of those ways).....at the time there was nothing that came close in that class of vehicle. Early evos don't do 12's factory....but they don't take much to get there either......a good clutch, slight boost increase, exhaust and a lack of mechanical sympathy will get you there fairly quickly - it's no coincidence that the 10sec club is now saturated with evo's all running their factory drivetrain :lol: they're built like brick shithouses under there


two questions A are the reliable and B are they expensive to fix or hard to work on if sumthing breaks?>
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby iOnic » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:59 pm

A are the reliable

They are as reliable as any other car.......it's all about how you treat it and how it has been treated by previous owners. Evo's are notorious for having a hard life because muppets buy them and thrash the tits off them or wind the boost up and go for gold. They're pretty hard wearing cars, they were designed to bash around gravel rally stages so they're by no means "delicate". They'll take a good beating and you've gotta be *really* trying to break the 4G63 or the drivetrain attached to it :lol:

B are they expensive to fix

They're not cheap cars to start with......so don't expect them to be cheap to fix. The good thing about them being everywhere is that parts for them are easy to come by and generally priced well - that and there are 9 other revisions of the car to rob parts off ;) and a VR4 as well for good measure

hard to work on if sumthing breaks?>

Not if you know your way around the engine bay. They aren't any harder to work on than any other jappa with a turbocharged inline 4 mounted transversely
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby dnalunchie » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:01 pm

iOnic wrote:
A are the reliable

They are as reliable as any other car.......it's all about how you treat it and how it has been treated by previous owners. Evo's are notorious for having a hard life because muppets buy them and thrash the tits off them or wind the boost up and go for gold. They're pretty hard wearing cars, they were designed to bash around gravel rally stages so they're by no means "delicate". They'll take a good beating and you've gotta be *really* trying to break the 4G63 or the drivetrain attached to it :lol:

B are they expensive to fix

They're not cheap cars to start with......so don't expect them to be cheap to fix. The good thing about them being everywhere is that parts for them are easy to come by and generally priced well - that and there are 9 other revisions of the car to rob parts off ;) and a VR4 as well for good measure

hard to work on if sumthing breaks?>

Not if you know your way around the engine bay. They aren't any harder to work on than any other jappa with a turbocharged inline 4 mounted transversely


how would you compare them with the st205 on the above points?> price? performance, reliability etc
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby snwtoy » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:03 pm

iOnic wrote:....


This man writes teh truth

The Evo is a quicker car than the Celica, but the Celica will get you there nearly as fast and in a lot more comfort.

The Evo is more balls out like the TypeR. Celica vs Evo is apples and oranges really.
User avatar
snwtoy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5810
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby sergei » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:04 pm

Lith wrote:
sergei wrote:That applies to internal. Flow dynamics is not simple subject.
But roughly speaking there is some venturi effect on the wastegate ports (from inside the turbine housing of course) when there is low pressure after turbine wheel .
See on the CT20b the ports are drilled at 90' into the housing, having also a narrowing in there and faster than designed gas flow would cause reduction in flow of through the wastegate ports.


Appreciate the link to Wikipedia, I kinda understand venturi effect already....... low pressure is a relative term. Do you think the pressure behind the turbine is lower than atmospheric pressure, or just lower than in the turbine housing?

The turbo doesn't spin at a constant relative speed to the engine either, it has an actuator which allows it to pump more air until a measured pressure level is reached before it starts the gases bypassing.

The only disadvantage I can think of putting a big exhaust on a GT4 is that you end up hearing 3SGTE noises.


That is the point as the stock waste gate is too restrictive.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Lith » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:08 pm

OK Just making sure, the way you were moving around it was hard to tell what the point you were trying to make was.
2007 Mazdaspeed Axela
User avatar
Lith
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3137
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 5:22 pm
Location: Kapiti

Postby B1NZ » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:39 pm

dnalunchie wrote:
two questions A are the reliable and B are they expensive to fix or hard to work on if sumthing breaks?>


From what I've seen the 4G63 is an almost bulletproof engine when it comes to reliability and as iconic has staed you have to be really trying to destroy one!

I have differeing views about the drivetrain though, I have seen a few evo gearboxes/transfer boxes lunch themselves but this is has always been on modified cars. Evos have rubbish cheap Mitsi interiors with a couple of nice seats thrown in though.

STiI's in stock form were always quicker than the evo and IMO have alot nicer interior and drive nicer except the Evo 5 STi V5 for memory, But if your looking to Mod the Mitsi will probably take a bit more punishment and will be easier/cheaper to get reliable power from.

An unmolested Evo provided you like them would be a good buy but good luck finding one ;-)

Just out of interest what were the details of your old GT Legacy you had problems with?
Subaru GF8 Wagon
Subaru GC8 rally car project
http://www.hccc.org.nz - Keep up to date with all motorsport events in the Wellington region
User avatar
B1NZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6043
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Capital City

Postby iOnic » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:50 pm

dnalunchie wrote:how would you compare them with the st205 on the above points?> price? performance, reliability etc


If you're on a budget the st205 is less likely to drive you to depression :P They're cheaper to buy, they perform fairly well and they're fairly reliable as well. They're not as easy to work on as an evo in terms of doing clutches, intercooler being where it is, engine being on a lean etc but then you won't have to open them up often if it's had a good life. If you have the extra to spend I'd go for the evo - you get more out of the factory package. But if you're strictly on a budget an st205 will set you right. Just don't expect to hop in and beat everything

As for being reliable......again like most cars it all depends on history. Don't listen to the "it's a Toyota it'll go forever" wankers, it's people like them that are the reason behind most mechanical failures because they don't maintain and care for their cars as well as they should due to the false pretense that Toyota makes cars differently to other manufacturers. Unless it's a K series, it's gonna break sooner or later if it's neglected. Reliability isn't something that goes across the board....I've seen ST205's with plenty of km's and I've seen others die before their first cambelt change :roll: It's all in how you and previous owners have treated the car......
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby Jdawg » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:15 pm

Why does everybody compare evo/impreza with Celica?
They are small class cars and the Celica is more intermediate class car. You should be comparing them with Corolla type cars and Celica ST205 with Legacy and VR4

I remember when the first Evo came out, They made a big impact on the Car reviewers car mags. That is why the hype. They were hyped from day 1, but by the press more than the factory which makes a difference in if a car becomes legendary.
Jdawg
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby DeeCee » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:39 am

2L AWD rally machines.. thats why there is the comparison.
GT Four Adovansu
"I want to enjoy the powerful and nimble agility behavior."

Project: viewtopic.php?t=60474
Discussion: viewtopic.php?t=60475
User avatar
DeeCee
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2765
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Postby dnalunchie » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:04 am

B1NZ wrote:
dnalunchie wrote:
two questions A are the reliable and B are they expensive to fix or hard to work on if sumthing breaks?>


From what I've seen the 4G63 is an almost bulletproof engine when it comes to reliability and as iconic has staed you have to be really trying to destroy one!

I have differeing views about the drivetrain though, I have seen a few evo gearboxes/transfer boxes lunch themselves but this is has always been on modified cars. Evos have rubbish cheap Mitsi interiors with a couple of nice seats thrown in though.

STiI's in stock form were always quicker than the evo and IMO have alot nicer interior and drive nicer except the Evo 5 STi V5 for memory, But if your looking to Mod the Mitsi will probably take a bit more punishment and will be easier/cheaper to get reliable power from.

An unmolested Evo provided you like them would be a good buy but good luck finding one ;-)

Just out of interest what were the details of your old GT Legacy you had problems with?


my legacy was a 1990 single turbo auto, first it droped a piston, (only running on 11psi) so i swapped in a new engine then the gearbox went, so I ended up selling it for $2,500 when i paid 4000 for it new and spent another 3000 maintaining it, i know this isnt true for all subie's but it did put me off them a little. The only thing that scares me about the likes of an evo 2 or 3 is the price they seem to be asking $15,000+ for a 1993/4 car where as even the mintest st205 from 1998 would not got for more than $10,000 privatly or maybe 12-13 on a yard.

Also as others have said, good luck finding an evo that hasnt been thrashed
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby Dell'Orto » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:35 pm

xsspeed wrote:Try finding a factory standard early evo might be hard though


Believe it or not, I actually saw a factory standard Evo 1 a few months back, was incredible. Pity the chap had just overheated it :?
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby xsspeed » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:44 pm

Overheating is factory spec? :lol:

I am sure they are about but, as said most early evos by now have been pretty thrashed/rangi mods etc

I reckon a stock example of any of the 'rally spec' from early 90s would be choice
xsspeed
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Auckland

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests