offensive wrote:theyre not used in the super gt series like supras
yeah but those cars are not very standard!
Moderator: The Mod Squad
offensive wrote:theyre not used in the super gt series like supras
pjay wrote:I would take a GTO over a 300ZX to be honest.
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Emperor wrote:Yeah... My mrs has told me to get alot of things instead of what *I* want, but somehow she gets over it? If she wont accept what YOU want, tell her to GTFO.
[/drphil]
pjay wrote:What prompted the want of a 300ZX? Drive in a mates?
I never liked GTO's myself untill a friend bought a MR version and the pull in 3rd gear, wow.
Looonie wrote:strx7 wrote:Supra over a 300zx anyday.
PITA to work on, Love cooking engine wiring looms.
If you haven't driven a JZA80, i suggest to take one for a drive, even a non turbo auto will rock your world for its Gran Turismoness and Supercar-like ride
I've driven a manual NA MKIV and a manual TT MKIV. Although admittedly not hard in either and not for long distances... I didn't think it was that "fantastic"... My JZX91 seems to handle awesomely compared to MKIII supras... just needs power, manual and lsd
Out of curiosity though... have you compared a JZX100 to a MKIV supra? Either turbo auto or turbo manual (like for like)? I sometimes wonder which would be the better car... the JZX seems like a more sporting chassis and is used more for track events (drifting and grip)... and is also stupidly cheaper than the supra...
Stott69 wrote:Go for a older Z, much nicer and easier to work on. The 260z with a turbo will go like nothing else if tuned right. They have prestige too!
mmmmmmmm!!!!! Z'ed!!!!!!!!!!
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests