bias valve

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Bazda » Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:11 pm

I would just change rear pads to different compounds for the desired grip that you need.
So much hastle to install a bias valve into a FWD, especially the way the M/C works as well.
1988 Toyota Levin GTZ 410kw atw @26psi
Join us on facebook - MRP - Manon Racing Products
http://www.mrpltd.co.nz
Turbonetics|Fortune Auto Coilovers|Wilwood brakes|Tilton clutches|
User avatar
Bazda
Toyspeed Sponsor
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:32 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby matt dunn » Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:47 pm

IH8TEC wrote:I've been through about 5 sets of front pads and still on the same set of std toyota back pads in factory callipers, they are about 1/4 - 1/2 worn,

the rears are hardly touched.


My car has similar problems withn brakes.
With good pads in the rear the bias doesn't remove enough rear and I just run crap pads.
Only downside is that it really chews thru the rears,
at least one, possibly two sets fo rear pads in a weekend,
and not just worn a bit, down to the backing plate.
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

right its nearly done

Postby fxgt race » Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:10 pm

At this stage the factory valve has been scraped,Ive conected the front brakes with a joiner were the valve used to be, so now the fronts are separate to the backs. Ive used a tee to join the rears together,run a line from the masters second port to the bias valve inside the cabin and out to the tee to the back brakes.

will have to test at puke before heading down to taupo for our first round to see ive the valve reduces the pressure enough,if not i will put another after market reducer valve in line.

the pads in the wilwoods are about the size of a match box but the calipers being 2 pot sure do work well, it saved 9.2 kgs in weight fitting these and removing the hand brake.
Pukekohe 1.07.6
Taupo 1.41.3
Manfield 1.18.7
hamptondowns 1.15.2
User avatar
fxgt race
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:14 am

Postby Bazda » Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:13 am

Just go for a drive down the road quickly and see if it locks the rears.
Must be some back roads you can do a few tests on.
1988 Toyota Levin GTZ 410kw atw @26psi
Join us on facebook - MRP - Manon Racing Products
http://www.mrpltd.co.nz
Turbonetics|Fortune Auto Coilovers|Wilwood brakes|Tilton clutches|
User avatar
Bazda
Toyspeed Sponsor
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:32 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby neo » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:15 am

For reference, both cars Ive used a adjustable proportioning valve in have had split front / rear systems.

For both I removed the factory bias adjuster/valve and ran the fronts directly off the master cylinder and the rears via the prop. valve. Never had any issues apart from the 3 laps I did with no meat left on the front pads :oops:
User avatar
neo
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1965
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 1:04 am
Location: Crazy Car Motorsport

Postby MAGN1T » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:29 am

Most sensible fix is to put the factory brakes back on the rear. The rears hardly do anything anyway.
Pretty pointless upgrading the rears, finding out that they lock up (as expected) then having to mod it more to overcome the initial cockup.
BTW been there done that with an upgrade. My fix was a single circuit system, remote booster only boosting the front. It wouldn't be legal these days though. That was big drums on the back too.

Steve
Computers make you go mad.
MAGN1T
!USER HAS BEEN BANNED!
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 11:34 pm

Postby Guss » Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:26 am

MAGN1T wrote:Pretty pointless upgrading the rears,
Steve


don't think so

fxgt race wrote:it saved 9.2 kgs in weight fitting these
Guss
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby IH8TEC » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:22 pm

Guss wrote:
MAGN1T wrote:Pretty pointless upgrading the rears,
Steve


don't think so

fxgt race wrote:it saved 9.2 kgs in weight fitting these


i'd rather have a car that doesn't lock up the rears around a race track and have have the extra 9.2kg.
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby matt dunn » Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:27 pm

As weird as it sounds, i am going to fit larger rear brakes to my car to prevent the rears locking,

as from the brake experts i'll talked too have said it will fix/help it.

Same way smaller puck clutches have more grip due to the same pressure on smaller surface area,

same pressure on a larger surface area gives less.

Going to test the theroy when I get a chance to suss out some discs and stuff that will be close enough to make fit.
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

come on

Postby fxgt race » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:34 pm

Pointless i don't think so,9.2 kgs is alot.Its a race car,weight is everything,when you have a race car you will understand.the valve is in and will see how it goes.Neo i think u understand,cheers. Power to weight is the key, as our class weight is 720kg with driver, my car still weights 770, Im looking for everything.
Pukekohe 1.07.6
Taupo 1.41.3
Manfield 1.18.7
hamptondowns 1.15.2
User avatar
fxgt race
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:14 am

Postby MAGN1T » Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:48 am

You could always throw a sack of cement in the boot to give it some ballast to stop it from locking up .
Totally pointless if you can't slow down without getting it sideways and having to lift off the brake pedal.
There's other ways too though. Bigger tyres on the back or taller tyres on the back.
Anyway, brakes, when you make them better you actually increase the weight transfer from rear to fromt so the rears do less and less.
Hey you could remove them altogether?

Steve
Computers make you go mad.
MAGN1T
!USER HAS BEEN BANNED!
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 11:34 pm

Postby Dunny » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:56 pm

What pad compounds are you running?
User avatar
Dunny
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 2:14 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby allencr » Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:15 pm

It might help if you stopped trying to call it a proportion or bias valve because it isn't & does nothing of the sort even though they are popular names for it, it's only a valve that limits pressure to the rears.
allencr
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Talahassee, Florida USofA

Postby TRD Man » Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:57 pm

Difficult to know where you're coming from here allencr. The std item on the bulkhead is very much a proportioning valve. It takes fluid in at a certain pressure and proportions that at differing pressures front & rear.

You are correct in respect of the adjustable item but as Wilwood themselves market the product as a proportioning valve it makes good sense, and is only natural, to refer to it as such.

Either way I think we all understand what is being spoken about and from his postings fxgt race is on the right track with what he is doing.
User avatar
TRD Man
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Previous

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests