High flow exhaust better fuel economy?

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Crampy » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:52 pm

Boost actuated exhaust cutout.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5gaAuGNk5M
Cool idea. Makes good power increase.

Now is that legal in NZ? I would think not, but can anyone ellaborate?
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby edwagon » Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:47 am

Turbo engines are easy to keep quiet - the exhaust wheel does alot of the 'muffling', so the exhaust has a pretty easy job!

on an Aristo/soarer etc, I stick with the twin pipes, and run 3" off the turbos, through an 18" coby resonator behind the gearbox and then into twin 2.5" pipes, and then out through 2.5" 'straight through' oval mufflers - get the biggest you can fit behind the bumper. You can run fancy tips to get the look you want.

The big oval mufflers have plenty of glass packing around them and so absorb alot of noise while not restricting flow - and the coby just helps take the edge off. Make sure you get 'straight through' tho - the chambered mufflers are more for n/a and are too restrictive imho

on a jz, this style of exhaust has a nice, deep tone, and is very civilised noise wise - def louder than stock (stock = silent), but only minimally, and very smooth and nice sounding.

I didn't find that it made my 2jz overboost at all, even with 3" straight off the dump - boost did rise, but not like the horror stories that you see on some forums. Mine wasn't vvti tho, so maybe that was the difference....
edwagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby offensive » Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:54 am

my tezza has nastey exaust noise too :(
TRD exaust, has converter and another silencer, still has cackely rattley noise

goddam 3s
above this is a line
quote: "Reclusive girls dont shave their pubes"
User avatar
offensive
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 3:49 pm
Location: land of tron

Postby Adamal » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:49 am

You pretty much need to make the exhaust depending on flow characteristics etc.
Theres also the pulsing/scavanging effect. If you have an exhaust too big, its not going to work properly. Too small, its going to take the engine to push it, sapping a bit of power out of it.
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby FLAWLES » Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:12 am

dont know why i havent seen this thread before

on my jz im runng my old vvti 1jzge tanabee system, which is 2.5' straight through, no cat, and two resonators, i did have the muffler to suit but due to some young fool rear ending me i now have a xforce cheapo muffler ( and i tell you what its lasted well )

my systme is loud when i have my foot up it ( imagine hell opening up and demon spwan screaming through the gates of hell ) its amazing the sound will rival any v8

but at idle and 100km/h its fine, my wee nipper loves it

i doo need to start looking at upgrading it soon due to the power increase but for now it will last

fuel eco, i can honestly say i havnt noticed mine change a hell of a lot................i do how ever get where im going faster
User avatar
FLAWLES
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:26 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby Crampy » Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:46 am

I must say I do like the idea of having twin mufflers. It would suit the look of the car better, as it comes stock with two.

I'l have a look into getting an exhaust down the track, it good to get these ideas first though.

I can't say I entirely agree that mufflers need to be straight through though. Properly designed turbo flow baffled/chambered mufflers still flow very well.

I do agree with needing big body mufflers. The fart cannon has no size to it, so will never soak up the sound as good as a big body oval muffler.
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby edwagon » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:51 am

Crampy wrote:I must say I do like the idea of having twin mufflers. It would suit the look of the car better, as it comes stock with two.

I can't say I entirely agree that mufflers need to be straight through though. Properly designed turbo flow baffled/chambered mufflers still flow very well.

I do agree with needing big body mufflers. The fart cannon has no size to it, so will never soak up the sound as good as a big body oval muffler.


Most guys running turbo jzs just run a single 3" for ease/cost, but I like the factory twin look - and it gives you two mufflers to soak up the noise as well as generous exhaust area.

I like the straight thru style mufflers and have had great success - Im lead to believe that the chambered/baffled mufflers (like factory style or lukey etc) are more for na cars, and are ok on v8s etc, but steer clear of them for turbos. Thats just what Ive been advised tho (by an exhaust wholesaler who was selling me stuff....)

Please yourself - just go with whatever the installer recommends - that way you have a comeback if the system sounds/performs poorly.
edwagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Crampy » Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:53 pm

Yeah, that's true. I might go and have a chat at Al's Mufflers. The dude there is good and doesn't seem to be full of $hit like some people I've seen (midas, pitstop, etc). Not saying those places are necessairly bad, just sometimes you get a tool that doens't really know what they're on about.
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby B_giB » Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:16 pm

I have heard nothing but good reports on Al's muffs.

Pitstop Wairau was good when Lance was there.
Current: SXE10 Altezza

Previous:AE86 Trueno Notch Back: Gone but not forgotten :cry: :(
AE101 Levin 20V super strut
1994 Mercedes Benz C280 Sport
User avatar
B_giB
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 7:02 pm
Location: Albany, Auckland

Postby Crampy » Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:58 pm

B_giB wrote:I have heard nothing but good reports on Al's muffs.

Pitstop Wairau was good when Lance was there.


I've had a bit of work done there already and will no doubt go back. Good work.
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby frost » Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:40 pm

Crampy wrote:Also, out of interest, Does having the butterfly closed have any effect on fuel economy?


on my 745 is does,
if i push sport mode, the butterfly on the second muffler opens and the noise is great :twisted:
but if i keep the butterfly open all day i chug the gas fast, however this could also be a ecu fueling thing due to "sport mode" mapping.
frost
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:19 pm

Postby ChaosAD » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:32 pm

The straight through mufflers that are shaped like a standard muffler are the way to go, they flow more and have more damping material than the stainless cannon mufflers.

Obviously if you do anything to improve the breathing of the engine your going to use more fuel
User avatar
ChaosAD
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:40 am
Location: Whangarei

Postby Adamal » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:28 pm

ChaosAD wrote:Obviously if you do anything to improve the breathing of the engine your going to use more fuel


Hmm... Not necessarily. If you make it easier for your engine to breath, you're improving the efficiency.

If you remove a form of restriction, less force is required by the engine to push the exhaust out.

Its a very similar concept to rally cars using intake restrictors to restrict the HP.
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby MAGN1T » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:28 am

ChaosAD wrote:
Obviously if you do anything to improve the breathing of the engine your going to use more fuel


Not really, it depends on the computer.

If you've got speed density then changing almost anything has the potential to change the AFR because the VE changes.
If it uses an AFM then there's no reason why the AFR or fuel economy will change.
If it's tuned properly a modded motor won't use any more fuel than a stock motor under normal road conditions.

Steve
Computers make you go mad.
MAGN1T
!USER HAS BEEN BANNED!
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 11:34 pm

Postby Crampy » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:04 pm

Adamal wrote:
ChaosAD wrote:Obviously if you do anything to improve the breathing of the engine your going to use more fuel


Hmm... Not necessarily. If you make it easier for your engine to breath, you're improving the efficiency.

If you remove a form of restriction, less force is required by the engine to push the exhaust out.

Its a very similar concept to rally cars using intake restrictors to restrict the HP.

Yeah I was hoping that would be the case. Dunno if it'll work in practice for my car though.
I'd say a 12 year old catalytic converter isn't going to be the flashest for flow.
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby Crampy » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:08 pm

Fuelling will increase with performance gaining mods, eg breathing mods, boost increase etc. As the motor is making more power.

But at 100km/h the engine is on bugger all load, so I wanted to know if the fuel economy would be better as the car now breathes more effeciently, compared to a stock exhaust. Or is this not really the case, as a stock exhaust will be able to flow fine at those lower loads?
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby Quint » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:02 pm

Crampy wrote:
Quint wrote:Will keep any eye on my economy now that i've freed up the exhaust. Should be better, by how much though.*shrug*

What's the car/engine and what exhaust have you got now? Just getting ideas going. Is it quiet, or loud but acceptable, or just down right rowdy?

2.5" straight through, 2" dump pipes collecting off both turbos, 1ggte. Put a new muffler on and its pretty much silent at idle.

My truck with standard exhaust is louder.
User avatar
Quint
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 2:24 pm

Postby mjrstar » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:18 pm

I have just de-fartcannoned my car. It had a fairly small silencer in it when i brought it, i have also gone from 2 1/2 inch to 3 inch.

The new exhaust is quieter although slightly deeper. It all comes down to ensuring you have a decent quality resinator and well made rear muffler to match. (and no 5 inch tips)

The car is slightly quieter than before and has gained a bit of low end boost response and like pulling passed 7000rpm now.

My old Mivec Diamante had the flapper by-pass in the exhaust, i guess it's of some use or they wouldn't bother doing it.
current cars:
Evo 4 230Kw atw
1971 mini.
79 bugeye 245kw atw.
Evo powered mx5 under construction

'not putting pictures in my signature since 2009'
User avatar
mjrstar
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:08 am

Postby Crampy » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:20 pm

mjrstar wrote:I have just de-fartcannoned my car. It had a fairly small silencer in it when i brought it, i have also gone from 2 1/2 inch to 3 inch.

The new exhaust is quieter although slightly deeper. It all comes down to ensuring you have a decent quality resinator and well made rear muffler to match. (and no 5 inch tips)

The car is slightly quieter than before and has gained a bit of low end boost response and like pulling passed 7000rpm now.

My old Mivec Diamante had the flapper by-pass in the exhaust, i guess it's of some use or they wouldn't bother doing it.


That's good to know. It looks like I can get away with a 3inch system for my Aristo, provided the mufflers are good.
Like this system on Ryan's car: viewtopic.php?t=72619&start=20
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby mjrstar » Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:39 am

^^ very nice system at a good price (i asked Ryan about this a while ago)

I went cheap an brought a 2nd hand cat back exhaust for 300 and made my own front pipe. Although i didn't realise 3'' flexi's cost more by weight than gold!!!


(click on them for bigger pics)
Image

Image
current cars:
Evo 4 230Kw atw
1971 mini.
79 bugeye 245kw atw.
Evo powered mx5 under construction

'not putting pictures in my signature since 2009'
User avatar
mjrstar
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:08 am

Previous

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests