Caldina GTT Dyno - Comment

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Caldina GTT Dyno - Comment

Postby Lac » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:37 pm

Hey,
Just did a big service on the Caldina and got them to Dyno and tune it for the second time, What do you think? Feels like its hammering on hi boost now.
Mods -
3inch exhaust after dump
K&N panel filter
Turbosmart Blow off
Greddy Profec B

Any comments on the graph?? Power is not huge but feels quick

Image
Caldina GTT Sydney
User avatar
Lac
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:07 pm

Postby MR2BOY23 » Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:51 pm

seems very low eh

Don't they make like 180kw stock standard?
MR2BOY23
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:30 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Lac » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:07 pm

Its at the wheels...it would be over 200kws at the fly or very near.
Caldina GTT Sydney
User avatar
Lac
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:07 pm

Postby sergei » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:08 pm

MR2BOY23 wrote:seems very low eh

Don't they make like 180kw stock standard?


180kW at the flywheel on 100 Octane brand new.
130kW is lowish, but that depends on dyno.
You should expect 140-150kW at the wheels (but then again depends on dyno).
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Quirky » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:16 pm

that seems low...
how much boost you running?
Hello There
Quirky
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: Townsville, Australia

Postby fivebob » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:20 pm

Lac wrote:Its at the wheels...it would be over 200kws at the fly or very near.

Err don't think so. 35% drivetrain loss is extremely unlikely. Maybe 170kw flywheel HP, but flywheel HP is at best only going to be a guesstimate. Horsepower at the wheels is what counts and that seems a bit low for a GTT, I would've expected around 150-170kw ATW with those mods.
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby Lac » Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:28 pm

Yer, Thats why ive posted this, I was expecting more.
It does feel quick,and i can hear the turbo whizzing around, running 16psi tuned correctly, maybe the overall Kw figure is wrong...? Or its that dyno.
Caldina GTT Sydney
User avatar
Lac
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:07 pm

Postby Heylin » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:08 pm

my mr2 was running 175kw at 16psi on a stuffed fuel pump. that seems pretty low. Even on factory computer running rich you should still be getting 150 at least.
Heylin
Heylin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 682
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 11:37 am

Postby QikStarlie » Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:42 pm

hmm but its only running about 9psi at max power tho,

fix the horrible boost spike?
User avatar
QikStarlie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: lost..

Postby Caldina3SGTE » Sat May 01, 2010 10:22 am

mines got a tdo5 turbo and on 17 psi i got 191kw atw on a rolling road thats factory fueling computer etc, few of my mates got around the 150 160 mark with stardard turbo running about 17-18psi
Caldina3SGTE
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:55 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby escortman » Sat May 01, 2010 11:03 am

yeh sort of the boost spike 1st
toyota supra 1996 2jzgte t64 turbonetics
Was 300hp on 10psi with stock twins, hopefully on similar boost be around 400hp

4x4 toyota blizzard offroader

widebody markII escort panelvan

RIP 13sec AE82 fxgt 4agte 5psi TD05 20g
escortman
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby Dell'Orto » Sat May 01, 2010 11:49 am

You're in Aussie yeah? Their dynos always seem to read low compared to ones here. Did they give you a AFR plot too?
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby strx7 » Sat May 01, 2010 1:06 pm

Heylin wrote:my mr2 was running 175kw at 16psi on a stuffed fuel pump. that seems pretty low. Even on factory computer running rich you should still be getting 150 at least.


Put the same in into a 4wd and do a dyno run and it'd probably only make 140.

Dyno Dynamics 4wd dyno's are pretty much the lowest reading dyno's around. Cracks me up when people says "its power at the wheels which counts" power at the wheels according to which type of dyno???????????
the same car on back to back runs between a Dyno Dynamics and a Dyno Max or Dyno Jet will "mysteriously" loose power on the Dynamics.
Online Car Forums - Where Hui seems to take preference over Do-ey

HDJ81- 112AWKW @ 10psi), FC3S (Tarmac Spec 335rwhp@11psi), 3SGTE stroker - replacement body found.

Motorsport Bay of Plenty - http://www.mbop.org.nz
strx7
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:06 am
Location: Tauranga

Postby fivebob » Sat May 01, 2010 2:47 pm

strx7 wrote:Cracks me up when people says "its power at the wheels which counts" power at the wheels according to which type of dyno???????????

According to an accurate dyno ;)

Regardless of the differences between dynos at least any ATW figure is a more accurate reflection of the HP available than some of the fanciful corrections people apply to get flywheel figures. Same applies to correction factors between dynos. In reality you can only compare runs from the same dyno under the same conditions.

In the end it's not the actual number that counts when you're tuning, it's the difference between runs on the same dyno, preferably under the same conditions, that tells you if you're going in the right direction.

I think you will find that when most people say "it's power at the wheels that counts" they are referring to the fanciful figures tuning shops quote for power at the flywheel, as opposed to the actual, albeit inconsistent between dynos, reading.
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby matt dunn » Sat May 01, 2010 2:54 pm

My car made 40 HP atw, so with 1000% drivetrain loss it makes
Hmm, would that be 4000HP at the flywheel or 40,000hp at the flywheel?

A flywheel figure is a guess at best, unless you run the engine on an engine dyno,

and at the wheels is all that matters, beacuse a car that has a bit more power, but a lot more drivetrain loss will not be as quick.
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

Postby fivebob » Sat May 01, 2010 3:01 pm

matt dunn wrote:My car made 40 HP atw, so with 1000% drivetrain loss it makes
Hmm, would that be 4000HP at the flywheel or 40,000hp at the flywheel?

You would have infinite power :o

As you can't lose more power than you make, the only way to get those drivetrain losses is to have it measured in a different universe where the laws of physics allow this ;)
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby Rych » Sat May 01, 2010 3:50 pm

fivebob wrote:
matt dunn wrote:My car made 40 HP atw, so with 1000% drivetrain loss it makes
Hmm, would that be 4000HP at the flywheel or 40,000hp at the flywheel?

You would have infinite power :o

As you can't lose more power than you make, the only way to get those drivetrain losses is to have it measured in a different universe where the laws of physics allow this ;)

Infinite power would be pretty insane, like Star Trek styles.. 8O
Today: '02 STI Spec C
Before: '86 Mirage / '91 VR4 / '91 Primera / '89 AE92 / '87 Landcruiser / '90 AE92 / '01 STi / '91 Kawasaki ZXR / '97 Jeep Wrangler / '98 Evo V / '06 Yamaha R6 / ’08 Honda CBR600RR / '01 Toyota Allex RS180
User avatar
Rych
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Hibiscus Coast, Auckland

Postby BZR4AGE » Sat May 01, 2010 4:38 pm

Are dyno dynamics hub dyno or roller dyno...it seems a bit low if its a hub dyno.
User avatar
BZR4AGE
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby strx7 » Sat May 01, 2010 5:54 pm

BZR4AGE wrote:Are dyno dynamics hub dyno or roller dyno...it seems a bit low if its a hub dyno.


Dyno Dynamics are roller dyno, the kiwi dynos "dynopac?" are the hub dynos.

in aussie the guy who died in his Giacatollo at Eastern Creek did back to back runs on 3 different dynos. The engine was also engine dyno'd before it was put in the car.
The dyno dynamics read 27% less HP than engine dyno
the dyno Jet (common US dyno) read 15% less than engine dyno
and the NZ Hub dyno Dynopac read 7% less than engine dyno.

As others have said, running on the same dyno with the same correction factors is only way you can truely compare gains or 1 car vs another
Online Car Forums - Where Hui seems to take preference over Do-ey

HDJ81- 112AWKW @ 10psi), FC3S (Tarmac Spec 335rwhp@11psi), 3SGTE stroker - replacement body found.

Motorsport Bay of Plenty - http://www.mbop.org.nz
strx7
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:06 am
Location: Tauranga

Postby Rych » Sat May 01, 2010 7:52 pm

I didn't realize how inaccurate dyno's are. So you mean to say you can't just go take your car to get dyno'd and see how much power it's making because most likely it could be way out and won't mean anything?

Surely there are accurate ones around???
Today: '02 STI Spec C
Before: '86 Mirage / '91 VR4 / '91 Primera / '89 AE92 / '87 Landcruiser / '90 AE92 / '01 STi / '91 Kawasaki ZXR / '97 Jeep Wrangler / '98 Evo V / '06 Yamaha R6 / ’08 Honda CBR600RR / '01 Toyota Allex RS180
User avatar
Rych
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Hibiscus Coast, Auckland

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests