30 arrested for boyracer activity in chch

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby RomanV » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:51 am

MoNk wrote:....natural selection?


Can someone please explain this to me?

Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby Elmo » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:22 am

scotty_ish wrote:What are the police doing about "the skids"?


How about, they are blocking in the people doing them on an illegally blocked off motorway on ramp and arresting them, just for starters that is.
User avatar
Elmo
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 3259
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:34 pm
Location: Chch

Postby RobertC » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:28 am

RomanV wrote:
MoNk wrote:....natural selection?


Can someone please explain this to me?

Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.

In this case. If all these 'boyracers' crashed their cars the world may be a better place.
User avatar
RobertC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:35 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Adamal » Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:58 am

RobertC wrote:
RomanV wrote:
MoNk wrote:....natural selection?


Can someone please explain this to me?

Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.



May have been suitable if it were the driver that died
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby MoNk » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:37 am

Adamal wrote:
RobertC wrote:
RomanV wrote:
MoNk wrote:....natural selection?


Can someone please explain this to me?

Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.



May have been suitable if it were the driver that died


I wouldn't place the blame on the driver alone.
Especially considering there were 6 in the car.

But I'm sure the driver has died inside.
User avatar
MoNk
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:53 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby RobertC » Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:38 am

Probably should of mentioned that it isn't my view and I don't agree with it. The post was to explain the use of the term 'natural selection'
for 'RomanV'.
User avatar
RobertC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:35 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Sideros » Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:57 am

Natural selection means the strong survive and the weak die. Who's to say these "boy racers" are actually weak?
Sideros
Signwriter
 
Posts: 2039
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:26 pm
Location: Palmerston North

Postby cat007 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:07 pm

Sideros wrote:Who's to say these "boy racers" are actually weak?


The fact that they can't hold off until a track day for one.
1:15.4 around Pukekohe
13.63 @ 169kmph at Meremere
Fastest MK3 at Suprafest 08
1G-GTE - Stinger 4424, T04B 60-1, 440cc injectors - 240rwkw @ 16psi
User avatar
cat007
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:29 pm

Postby Sideros » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:32 pm

No that's weak in the mind. Natural selection deals primarily with physical strength.
Sideros
Signwriter
 
Posts: 2039
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:26 pm
Location: Palmerston North

Postby iOnic » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:45 pm

Tell that to the next dinosaur you see.
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby cat007 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:15 pm

Sideros wrote:No that's weak in the mind. Natural selection deals primarily with physical strength.



Tell that to animals that are adapting and changing their strategies (read: mental state and thought process) because their body (read: physical strength) can't keep up

i.e. Natural selection is very similar to evolution
1:15.4 around Pukekohe
13.63 @ 169kmph at Meremere
Fastest MK3 at Suprafest 08
1G-GTE - Stinger 4424, T04B 60-1, 440cc injectors - 240rwkw @ 16psi
User avatar
cat007
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:29 pm

Postby Bling » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:18 pm

iOnic wrote:Tell that to the next dinosaur you see.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby RomanV » Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:09 pm

Adamal wrote:
May have been suitable if it were the driver that died


This is what I was getting at.

Natural selection is when a genetic inferiority in a particular situation makes it less feasible to procreate successfully.

If two people were running away from a bear, and one can run faster than the other because they're naturally bigger and stronger, and one gets eaten, that's natural selection.

It's not natural selection when someone hops into someones car for a ride, and ends up dying because the driver was a tard.

If the driver had no natural sense of balance and lost control of the car on account of it and killed themselves, that would be natural selection... And just an unlucky occurance for the passengers if there were any.

I dont understand the smug callousness that is associated with saying it, especially when it's not even in a relevant context.

"Well they were stupid for being a passenger in someones car, they deserve to die, it's natural selection at work!"

If someone deserved to die for hopping into someones car, the penalty for getting caught doing so would be the death penalty.

If they dont deserve to die for it, then why do people act smug when it happens?

It's also natural selection at work when a baby dies from a genetic disorder or heart failure or something.

It doesnt mean it's appropriate to say "Ha! Natural selection!" to the mother.
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby h8wrxs » Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:06 pm

i left chch 3 years ago and since then it has changed alot, every time i go home i see my old mates and just shake my head. the whole cruising scene has turned to shit...

if these idiots were stupid enough to run from the cops then it was their choice to risk theyre lives, only thing i see a problem with is that they would put innocent people in danger while doing so...

still at least thats one idiot off the road
The four seasons in Australia consist of "$&#$% it's hot", "Can you believe how $&#$% hot it is?", "I won't be in today because it is too $&#$% hot" and "Yes, the dinner plate size spiders come inside to escape from the heat."
User avatar
h8wrxs
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1026
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:07 am
Location: travelling to candy mountain with my magical leoplurodon

Postby Kittah » Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:09 pm

Sideros wrote:No that's weak in the mind. Natural selection deals primarily with physical strength.


No it doesn't.

Humanity's physical state should have given us up to predators thousands of years ago, if not sooner. It is only our intellect that has kept us alive and evolving.

cat007 wrote:i.e. Natural selection is very similar to evolution


Yup, evolution is the logical result of natural selection, among other things. Selected traits that are successful continue on and develop.
Last edited by Kittah on Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kittah
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 7:25 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Al » Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:12 pm

RomanV wrote:
Adamal wrote:
May have been suitable if it were the driver that died


This is what I was getting at.

Natural selection is when a genetic inferiority in a particular situation makes it less feasible to procreate successfully.

If two people were running away from a bear, and one can run faster than the other because they're naturally bigger and stronger, and one gets eaten, that's natural selection.

It's not natural selection when someone hops into someones car for a ride, and ends up dying because the driver was a tard.

If the driver had no natural sense of balance and lost control of the car on account of it and killed themselves, that would be natural selection... And just an unlucky occurance for the passengers if there were any.

I dont understand the smug callousness that is associated with saying it, especially when it's not even in a relevant context.

"Well they were stupid for being a passenger in someones car, they deserve to die, it's natural selection at work!"

If someone deserved to die for hopping into someones car, the penalty for getting caught doing so would be the death penalty.

If they dont deserve to die for it, then why do people act smug when it happens?

It's also natural selection at work when a baby dies from a genetic disorder or heart failure or something.

It doesnt mean it's appropriate to say "Ha! Natural selection!" to the mother.


+1

Can't let the facts get in the way of a good story.
85 Corolla GT - 08 Blade Master G
Image
User avatar
Al
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6146
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:52 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby metal_sean_head » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:22 pm

Read an article about this in the star times today. 6 people in the car?! So thats one more person than there is seatbelts? Showed a picture of the car. Pretty mangled. Lancer gsr by the looks. Front mount, mags etc.
VTEC: All of the lag and none of the boost.

89 AE92 FXGT
Big Port Redtop
TVIS!

19.8@32kph
User avatar
metal_sean_head
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:11 am
Location: Wellington.

Postby Elmo » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:49 pm

It didnt even damage the pole (its still standing)

Back on topic, has anyone heard any word on the arrests? I lol'd real loud when I saw it on the news!
User avatar
Elmo
Old Skool User!
 
Posts: 3259
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:34 pm
Location: Chch

Postby DXROLLA » Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:01 pm

Haha yeah drove past it today they havnt even cleaned up the mess, i see the traffic light poll is bent in half and lying on the ground, no tyre marks or anything so they must of been going for it
DXROLLA
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby RomanV » Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:29 pm

metal_sean_head wrote:Read an article about this in the star times today. 6 people in the car?! So thats one more person than there is seatbelts?


Again, it's irrelevant, as the person who died was in the front passenger seat.

It wouldnt have made any difference if there was only two of them.
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests