Moderator: The Mod Squad
Bazda wrote:Measure it if you have lots of these heads lying around.
Cut some clear perspex out, drill 2 holes in it, measure the amount of water you fill it up with.
Flannelman wrote:it will create more torque earlyer and have more midrange
Flannelman wrote:yet it will be far more controllable especialy in wet weather.
gt4dude wrote:
not to mention , NA heads are cammed for overlap , a free supercharging for an NA, and a way for boost to get blown right across the head and straight out the exhaust, or even possibly if you have a poorly designed manifold, you can fire exhaust pulses straight into the opposing intaking cylinder
MAGN1T wrote:gt4dude wrote:
not to mention , NA heads are cammed for overlap , a free supercharging for an NA, and a way for boost to get blown right across the head and straight out the exhaust, or even possibly if you have a poorly designed manifold, you can fire exhaust pulses straight into the opposing intaking cylinder
What a load of shyte.
So what you're saying is that vtecs don't work with turbos, neither do mivecs? nor anything that's a hot N/A and turboed.
What an amusing read?
Same as what you read on US based forums.....not to be taken seriously.
The better your head flows, the more HP/torque you'll get per pound of boost. So effectively you can use a smaller turbo that comes on sooner and doesn't need to make so much boost to make the same power.
Have you never heard the old saying "all the power is in the head"
Steve
gt4dude wrote:But you wouldn't really know if you were blowing out boost, apart from a rough engine note and the wastegate would be a lower pressure zone compared to a bar of boost coming from the other way.
It's a very small window of overlap anyways, but its something.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 22 guests