Diesel Rego

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Bling » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:16 pm

What did it used to be, that's pretty extreme, diesel 1-3.5t?
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby ee904age » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:20 am

ATAl wrote:
Also from looking at the nzta fees web page http://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicle/registration-licensing/fees.html it looks like it's $30 cheaper to cancel the rego and get a new set of plates and 1 years rego for $548 for some reason, anyone know if there's some catch here?


Yes, the compliance check you will need before re-registering. Depending on vehicle, about $250.
90 SW20 Turbo - Project
90 SW20 N/A - Sold
User avatar
ee904age
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Wanganui

Postby ee904age » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:22 am

Oh and also the $1.49 difference between 1-3500kg and 3501-6000kg. WTF!
90 SW20 Turbo - Project
90 SW20 N/A - Sold
User avatar
ee904age
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Wanganui

Postby Malcolm » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:02 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:As above the alternative is suing each other if you have an accident to get money to pay your medical bills. Or pay rego and get 'free' treatment. I know which i'd rather do :) Likewise i'd rather pay any insurance and not have to claim, than have to claim. As if you need to claim ACC you have been injured in an accident and will have associated hassles involved with your recovering. No hassle > hassle :wink:


Actually the alternative is probably private health insurance - which may or may not be a good thing. It would be good in that it would be purchased for an individual, not for a vehicle (eliminating the multiple payments for people with more than one vehicle), but unlike ACC (or atleast the original concept of ACC, from which the current system is reasonably departed), you'd be assessed/profiled and have to pay based on your likelihood of being injured, which would probably be bad for most people on this site (young males are always hurting themselves). Being commercialised/competitive, it would probably lead to trimming of a lot of fat in terms of needless beauracracy within the organisation, which should reduce costs. Would it be cheaper overall? I suspect probably not, especially for those of us who are probably quite high risk.
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Bling » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:42 pm

Don't forget those that can't get health insurance, or if they manage to find a company that will cover them.... charges would be enormous. :oops:
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Previous

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests