Caldina 2.0G economy

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Caldina 2.0G economy

Postby paulngui » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:24 pm

Hi, I just filled up my car and worked out that I got 10.9 L/100km from my last tank. My drives are 90% suburban with just a couple of motorway trips; and I try to drive economically, never revving it higher than ~2400rpm.

This seems extremely high for an NA Caldina with the not-very-powerful 3S-FE motor; just wondering if anyone else with this engine gets this bad economy.
paulngui
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: East Auckland

Postby sergei » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:29 pm

Try revving it higher ;).
Try 95 and see if it helps.
Additionally check for error codes.
You could also put voltmeter on VF pin in diagnostics connector, and see if it is 2.5V (or close), while the car is running (and fully warmed up).

10L/100Km is normal for car like that, but that is just driving normally and not saving fuel. If you are "hypermiling" it, you should get 8L/100km in town.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby BZG Wagon » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:30 pm

My turbo caldina gets better economy then that.

Is yours 4wd? Automatic? What type of fuel do you run? When was the last time you checked the air in the tyres?

Be careful with not revving it too high - you can put the enging under enourmous stress by not revving it out properly (I'm not saying redline it -just drive it normally).

Try giving it a really good service too - clean out the throttle body, change the oil, filters etc. And a thrash every once and a while can do wonders for a car (loosen up all the built up carbon in the motor).
User avatar
BZG Wagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Waitakere City, Auckland.

Postby paulngui » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:45 pm

Knew I'd forget stuff! It's the FF auto model.

Admittedly, it's been a while since I checked the tire pressure, but I do give them a pump maybe twice a year. Is this way too infrequent? And it does get a service annually. But to be fair it's always ranged between 10-11L/100km for that kind of driving (90% suburban) in the 4.5 years I've had it.

With regards to checking error codes, and checking the voltage on the diagnostics connector, I'm not sure how to do those. Is it easy enough to explain on here? If not don't worry :)
paulngui
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: East Auckland

Postby Bling » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:54 pm

Doesn't sound outrageous for an auto. I get that with my 1600.... granted I hardly ever rev it BELOW 2400 :lol:

Have you tested the mileage on a long trip? I get 400km to roughly 40L around town, but would get much closer to 500km open road.
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby BZG Wagon » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:00 pm

I try to check my tyres monthly (maybe a little obsessive). A couple times a year is on the other end of that scale so you should definately keep an eye on it more frequently. You can also look at less grippy tyres if you've got something fancy on it.

An annual service is a poor effort too - every six months or 10,000kms at least. More often if you drive it in traffic regularly.

To run diagnostics just locate the check connector, which should be close to the drivers door, by the little compartment thingy where your knees are. Bridge TC & CG and turn on the ignition. Count the engine flashes then google them to see if there are any issues.
Image
User avatar
BZG Wagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Waitakere City, Auckland.

Postby iOnic » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:22 pm

That's pretty shocking. My Mondog gets between 6 and 8L/100km and weighs as much as a small planet.
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby Al » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:26 pm

iOnic wrote:That's pretty shocking. My Mondog gets between 6 and 8L/100km and weighs as much as a small planet.


C'mon this is TS, you will be soon told how rubbish your Mondeo is. Even though it probably cost 1/4 of the price of a featureless Camry and gets better milage.
85 Corolla GT - 08 Blade Master G
Image
User avatar
Al
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6146
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:52 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby iOnic » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:41 pm

:lol: :lol:
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby peas » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:05 pm

My GT gets about 8-11kml/100km round town (according to the computer thing anyway) Though it was running worse than that until I replaced a fairly bad wheel bearing. I'm not a light footed driver by any stretch of the imagination either. Seems to use a lot more fuel until it reaches operating temp.
'97 Caldina GT (ST215G)
User avatar
peas
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:30 am
Location: North Shore

Postby rollaholic » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:43 pm

your mondeo is rubbish and you should have paid twice as much for a 96 corolla with 280k on the clock
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby iOnic » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:56 pm

:lol: Paid more for my 85 Corolla with 350kms on the clock :lol: and it used almost twice as much fuel before I added a turbo...Maybe I should sell the mondeo for something non european that will be cheaper to run and more reliable.
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Re: Caldina 2.0G economy

Postby Sick Puppy » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:44 pm

paulngui wrote:Hi, I just filled up my car and worked out that I got 10.9 L/100km from my last tank. My drives are 90% suburban with just a couple of motorway trips; and I try to drive economically, never revving it higher than ~2400rpm.

This seems extremely high for an NA Caldina with the not-very-powerful 3S-FE motor; just wondering if anyone else with this engine gets this bad economy.
I do too, with a manual 4WD g-spec one. Just figured it was heavier than the 2WD 3S-GE Curren I had, and sucked it up. Darn family wanting a four door wagon :lol:
Project thread here

Discussion thread here
Sick Puppy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby paulngui » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:26 pm

BZG Wagon wrote:I try to check my tyres monthly (maybe a little obsessive). A couple times a year is on the other end of that scale so you should definately keep an eye on it more frequently. You can also look at less grippy tyres if you've got something fancy on it.

An annual service is a poor effort too - every six months or 10,000kms at least. More often if you drive it in traffic regularly.

To run diagnostics just locate the check connector, which should be close to the drivers door, by the little compartment thingy where your knees are. Bridge TC & CG and turn on the ignition. Count the engine flashes then google them to see if there are any issues.
Image


Thanks for the info, I'll check it out when I get a chance :)

Best I've had from driving the open road during road trips or whatever is I think just over 7 L/100km. Average for open road is more like 8 though.
paulngui
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: East Auckland

Postby Sick Puppy » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:51 pm

One tank of 98 at 65L got me 500km of city driving, which comes to 7.7km/L. 8O

I think I need to check my oxygen sensor...
Last edited by Sick Puppy on Wed Dec 28, 2011 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Project thread here

Discussion thread here
Sick Puppy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby samlloyd » Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:23 am

Dont try and keep the revs under a certain amount. Its all about how hard you press on the accelerator.
Karl Pilkington On seals - "Its between a fish and a dog."
User avatar
samlloyd
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1047
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:01 am
Location: Rotorua/gold coast/Bangkok

Postby sergei » Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:19 am

samlloyd wrote:Dont try and keep the revs under a certain amount. Its all about how hard you press on the accelerator.


Not true. There is a thing called pumping loss. When you close the throttle engine is working against it, the higher RPM the harder is for engine to suck through the throttle. To reduce pumping loss either reduce RPM or increase throttle opening.
Basically most efficient way of accelerating is ~3/4 of the throttle at medium to high RPM. Once you there put it in high gear/low throttle.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore


Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests