Toyspeed.org.nz Message Board

by **GTTpower** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:54 am

Suprised no one has mentioned the ST165 GT4.

by **1I1** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:55 am

GTTpower wrote:Suprised no one has mentioned the ST165 GT4.

No 4wd's allowed

by **GTTpower** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:11 am

1I1 wrote:
GTTpower wrote:Suprised no one has mentioned the ST165 GT4.

No 4wd's allowed

Me=fail

by **fuel** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:14 am

yeah if 4WD's were allowed you'ld be getting E39A Galant VR-4s and C62A Lancer/Mirage cyborgs crapping all over the ST165s

by **MikeMan** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:28 am

fuel wrote:yeah if 4WD's were allowed you'ld be getting E39A Galant VR-4s and C62A Lancer/Mirage cyborgs crapping all over the ST165s

I still think a FWD one would go OK in this with a good LSD.

OMG so shiny! · by **Dell'Orto** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:11 pm

fuel wrote:yeah if 4WD's were allowed you'ld be getting E39A Galant VR-4s and C62A Lancer/Mirage cyborgs crapping all over the ST165s

Especially once you swap the hoses bei :lol:

by **JustinSpiderholden** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:49 pm

Dell'Orto wrote:
fuel wrote:yeah if 4WD's were allowed you'ld be getting E39A Galant VR-4s and C62A Lancer/Mirage cyborgs crapping all over the ST165s

Especially once you swap the hoses bei

Yeah and thats the reason the E39A Gallants smashed the ST165 in the WRC

by **touge rolla** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:14 pm

JustinSpiderholden wrote:
Yeah and thats the reason the E39A Gallants smashed the ST165 in the WRC

Huh?

by **fuel** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:03 pm

was clearly a joke, even I know the ST165 did well in the WRC. However track racing != WRC last time I checked. Toyota no doubt did well due to their extreme reliability, not necessarily their speed

by **RomanV** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:04 pm

fuel wrote: Toyota no doubt did well due to their cheating

Fixed.

(yeah, I know it was the ST205)

by **JustinSpiderholden** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:12 pm

fuel wrote:was clearly a joke, even I know the ST165 did well in the WRC. However track racing != WRC last time I checked. Toyota no doubt did well due to their extreme reliability, not necessarily their speed

I'd still say a well set up st165 would compete very well against an early model VR4

by **cogent** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:15 pm

JustinSpiderholden wrote:I'd still say a well set up st165 would compete very well against an early model VR4

$&#$%, whatever bro.
my cousins mates jizza goes hard as fuk bro.
massive frount mount, big az - cant even run a bumper its so big.
and the mad external goes haaaard. real mean SKISHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

by **fuel** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:34 pm

^^^ not every mitsi owner is like that would you believe

I have a VR-4 and I'm making a point to *not* do any of the above.

by **JustinSpiderholden** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:46 pm

cogent wrote:
JustinSpiderholden wrote:I'd still say a well set up st165 would compete very well against an early model VR4

$&#$%, whatever bro.
my cousins mates jizza goes hard as fuk bro.
massive frount mount, big az - cant even run a bumper its so big.
and the mad external goes haaaard. real mean SKISHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

Oh man sounds Sickooooooooo do you have a mate named Kevvv with a big Dickooooooooooo

fuel wrote:^^^ not every mitsi owner is like that would you believe I have a VR-4 and I'm making a point to *not* do any of the above.

Yes we now that its mainly the ones with Choosen few stickers on there cars

by **flygt4** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:57 pm

fuel wrote:^^^ not every mitsi owner is like that would you believe I have a VR-4 and I'm making a point to *not* do any of the above.

I had a completely standard one too, i even removed a cut up bumper and had a mint standard one installed. they are in my opinion by far the fastest car of the type from what was available at the time. the stock suspension was very soft and whaley, but with a very conservative exhaust setup and 1bar boost my old one was respectfully rapid. much more so than my ST185 ever was at its very best. I would rate it as roughly equivalant in straight line speed to a tiptronic caldina GTT.

moot point though as the class being discussed doesn't allow them :lol:

by **fuel** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:00 pm

good on ya, nothing worse than a cut up bumper to fit an oversized fridge up front. Mine's an evolution and has the extra vents and what not, not keen to see it cut up at all. Suspension is definitely whale like haha.

mine here - http://s97.photobucket.com/albums/l230/te71se/91zero/

by **xsspeed** » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:05 pm

OT but Nice seats ^

by **FLAWLES** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:46 pm

why dont you think out side the box and go for a

r30/31 skyline
or a lovely fj20det powered s12 silva
910 bluebirds etc

somethig a along the lines of the old super silhouette race cars of the 80s

[/img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/BenzBoy/Day3jpg31.jpg[img]

etc etc etc

dont have to run with the massive box flares but you get the pics[/img]

by **FLAWLES** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:48 pm

by **MikeMan** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:30 pm

A Z31 300ZX Turbo could also be a player in this series.

Toyspeed.org.nz Message Board

Pre '89 1UZ?

Who is online