Thought about blow off valves

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Thought about blow off valves

Postby LEAKER » Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:46 pm

Random thought id like to open up for discussion
if you were to take a turbo car with a blow off valve that has a feedback into the intake and then move the feedback to feed into the exhaust manifold would it create anywhere near enough air pressure to assist with spooling the turbo quicker between changes and make the car faster in anyway or would it be a complete waste of time?
The GT4 is to Celicas what the GTR is to skylines.
User avatar
LEAKER
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 pm
Location: Lower Mutt

Postby Santa'sBoostinSleigh » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:02 pm

I would imagine you'd end up just heating up your intake
couldnt see it helping at all
Santa's Mega Sale
Santa's TardMe Listings
GTFX: viewtopic.php?t=67655
Discussion: viewtopic.php?t=67658

Some cocksmack stole one of my 5ANTA plates, if you see it please let me/the police know, ta
User avatar
Santa'sBoostinSleigh
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: 'Naki Massif

Postby LEAKER » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:06 pm

There wouldn't be a feed going to the intake. It would now go into the exhaust manifold.
The GT4 is to Celicas what the GTR is to skylines.
User avatar
LEAKER
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 pm
Location: Lower Mutt

Postby Luke - BZG » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:07 pm

I think it would do bugger all, feeding into the exhaust manifold it would would be expanding not only towards the turbo but also towards the exhaust valves, pushing against exhaust gases on their way to the turbo.
User avatar
Luke - BZG
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:36 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby LEAKER » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:10 pm

Yeah good point, I hadn't thought about that side of things.
The GT4 is to Celicas what the GTR is to skylines.
User avatar
LEAKER
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 pm
Location: Lower Mutt

Postby Dell'Orto » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:13 pm

And possibly the exhaust gas would push back through the path of least resistance aka the small low pressure feed ;)
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Santa'sBoostinSleigh » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:13 pm

but the air that is blown off is on the intake side of things is it not, so if that was plumbed to the exhaust, heat would travel back up the plumbing to the intake
Santa's Mega Sale
Santa's TardMe Listings
GTFX: viewtopic.php?t=67655
Discussion: viewtopic.php?t=67658

Some cocksmack stole one of my 5ANTA plates, if you see it please let me/the police know, ta
User avatar
Santa'sBoostinSleigh
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: 'Naki Massif

Re: Thought about blow off valves

Postby Adoom » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:29 pm

LEAKER wrote:... a complete waste of time


As I see it, you would get not enough air and it would be at the wrong time.
The pressure difference would also probably be wrong and you would get exhaust going backwards through the BOV instead of the excess intake charge going out. Shit you don't want hot would end up getting hot. You would be better off hooking some compressed air or something up to the exhaust housing to spool it up faster when you mash your foot down. Not sure that would work either.
User avatar
Adoom
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Upper Hutt

Postby Adoom » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:31 pm

I type too slow...
User avatar
Adoom
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Upper Hutt

Re: Thought about blow off valves

Postby tsoob » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:36 pm

Adoom wrote:
LEAKER wrote:... a complete waste of time


As I see it, you would get not enough air and it would be at the wrong time.
The pressure difference would also probably be wrong and you would get exhaust going backwards through the BOV instead of the excess intake charge going out. Shit you don't want hot would end up getting hot. You would be better off hooking some compressed air or something up to the exhaust housing to spool it up faster when you mash your foot down. Not sure that would work either.


its called nitrous oxide.
Platinum Wheels
15 Parkway Drive
Mairangi Bay
09 486 5317
WHEELS, TYRES & SUSPENSION!
www.platinumwheels.co.nz
User avatar
tsoob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: 201.1kw on 19psi

Postby Malcolm » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:41 pm

On the ST205 Group A models, there was a system similar to what you describe, as part of the non-functional antilag system. I'm not certain whether the purpose of this additional air was to provide some cooling to the exhaust components to mitigate some of the premature failure of components that antilag can cause, or whether it was to provide fresh air to help the fuel combust in the exhaust runners to make the system more effective.
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby tim_blair » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:53 pm

by using the plumb back in the standed setup you are basicly doin what you want to do any way as the rush of air going into the intake from your valve before the turbo has only two ways to go, out the intake/ airfilter against the flow of air and/or down the intake towards the turbo with the flow of air, as it goes towards the intake of the turbo compressor it has muchly the same effect as going into the inlet of the turbine (its still pushing the turbo around in the same direction)

however haveing the air push your turbo around via the compressor isnt as efficient as pushing it via the turbine because of the shape of the vanes its still going to be better than disrupting the exhaust gas flow and possibly haveing exhaust gas push its way into your intake
girl: can I trust you?
me: you can trust anything :D
tim_blair
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:05 pm
Location: wellington

Postby h8wrxs » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:55 pm

Malcolm wrote:On the ST205 Group A models, there was a system similar to what you describe, as part of the non-functional antilag system. I'm not certain whether the purpose of this additional air was to provide some cooling to the exhaust components to mitigate some of the premature failure of components that antilag can cause, or whether it was to provide fresh air to help the fuel combust in the exhaust runners to make the system more effective.


i think some of the evo4s onwards had a similar setup? dont think it worked very well though
The four seasons in Australia consist of "$&#$% it's hot", "Can you believe how $&#$% hot it is?", "I won't be in today because it is too $&#$% hot" and "Yes, the dinner plate size spiders come inside to escape from the heat."
User avatar
h8wrxs
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1026
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:07 am
Location: travelling to candy mountain with my magical leoplurodon

Postby Malcolm » Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:03 am

didn't work very well on the ST205s either, due to being completely disabled
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby LEAKER » Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:48 am

Well it was worth a thought anyway.
The GT4 is to Celicas what the GTR is to skylines.
User avatar
LEAKER
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 pm
Location: Lower Mutt

Postby Akane » Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:27 am

and if you take the ST205 WRC blow off valve, it actually has 2 halves, a really complex system if you ask me, and IMO it's to provide fresh air for the badadadadadada VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! :lol: :lol:
No "stance", no "hellaflush", none of that bullshit. Nothing but no grip on full boost.
http://www.lol.co.nz/ random shit.
User avatar
Akane
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 2:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby rollaholic » Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:35 pm

it would make for some sweet flames out the back im sure.

not to mention causing all kinds of fits for your o2 sensor :D
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby CelicaGT8 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:14 pm

AFM has registered the air coming in, and if it wasn't there it would make it run rich for a split second?
User avatar
CelicaGT8
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:50 am
Location: South Auckland

Postby VR-4Squid » Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:53 pm

CelicaGT8 wrote:AFM has registered the air coming in, and if it wasn't there it would make it run rich for a split second?


Throttle is closed, engine rpm is (way) above idle, therefore fuel injected = zero.

Internet/magazine myth #2296 debunked.
Image
SquidInc Custom CARtoons
VR-4Squid
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 6:22 pm
Location: Diamond mine

Postby strx7 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:57 pm

VR-4Squid wrote:
CelicaGT8 wrote:AFM has registered the air coming in, and if it wasn't there it would make it run rich for a split second?


Throttle is closed, engine rpm is (way) above idle, therefore fuel injected = zero.

Internet/magazine myth #2296 debunked.


not true. Take 1 Series 4 or 5 rx7, vent the BOV to atmosphere = flamage on gear, for this exact reason.
Online Car Forums - Where Hui seems to take preference over Do-ey

HDJ81- 112AWKW @ 10psi), FC3S (Tarmac Spec 335rwhp@11psi), 3SGTE stroker - replacement body found.

Motorsport Bay of Plenty - http://www.mbop.org.nz
strx7
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:06 am
Location: Tauranga

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests