Thinking about buying Advanti SA15's. Yes or No? *Pics*

Burning questions of the day answered by the Toyspeed populace

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Should I go for the SA15's?

Yes
20
59%
No
14
41%
 
Total votes : 34

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:54 pm

I'd actually recommend 15s if street-ability is your goal
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby rollaholic » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:15 pm

yeah bigger sidewalls ftw.

small cars on big rims look like rollerskates to me, even those racecar pics that snoozin posted which are totally justified in having big wheels.
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby Dell'Orto » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:40 pm

I do <3 having 15's on the Levin, much cushier than 17's. The 101s look good with bigger wheels though, Corollas have huge wheel arches
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby molex » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:59 pm

+1 million votes for 15's.

Considering the supreme effort you have put into the OEM+ japanese quirkiness in every other area I have always felt your wheels dragged down the whole.
molex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby GTTpower » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:09 pm

molex wrote:+1 million votes for 15's.

Considering the supreme effort you have put into the OEM+ japanese quirkiness in every other area I have always felt your wheels dragged down the whole.


Agree, no substitute will do justice. TRD, TOM's or nothing :wink:
1999 SXE10 Altezza RS200Z
2004 Honda SCV100
Previous: 1993 EP85 Starlet, 1984 KP60 Starlet
Steam/Origin ID: nzEP85
User avatar
GTTpower
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:47 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby Kiwi-Corolla » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:25 pm

fuel wrote:just don't get weak width and offset 17s.


rollaholic wrote:agree, +35 or so absolute max offset. the less offset the more man points :P


I agree. I would really prefer to go no higher than +35, but since I'd be buying the wheels secondhand I don't really have a lot of choice, unless I use spacers. If I were to buy some wheels brand new however, I'd definitely be going for a +30 to +35 offset and a 7" to 8" width wheel.

ch4ng wrote:15's are cool but the car does need to be very low for them to look great, imo go for the 17's and you can keep your street drivability


My thoughts exactly. If I was to ever use 15's I'd either have to use massively tall tyres or lower the car right down. Easier just to stick with the 17's :)

rollaholic wrote:yeah bigger sidewalls ftw.

small cars on big rims look like rollerskates to me, even those racecar pics that snoozin posted which are totally justified in having big wheels.


Dell'Orto wrote:I do <3 having 15's on the Levin, much cushier than 17's. The 101s look good with bigger wheels though, Corollas have huge wheel arches


Yeah I can imagine how much comfier the 15's would be over the 17's. I remember that the original 14's made it feel as if I was driving on a cloud :lol:. What's the body-roll like with 15's coupled with large sidewall tyres though? The body-roll reduced significantly when I changed from 14's (can't remember the exact tyre size but they were pretty tall) to 17's with 205/40's.

molex wrote:+1 million votes for 15's.

Considering the supreme effort you have put into the OEM+ japanese quirkiness in every other area I have always felt your wheels dragged down the whole.


Thank you for your honesty. A set of TOM's or TRD wheels would definitely compliment the other OEM parts/options nicely 8)

GTTpower wrote:Agree, no substitute will do justice. TRD, TOM's or nothing :wink:


Haha, I think I'll have to set-up a 'DONATE' button in my signature which is linked to PayPal. That's the only way I'd be able to get enough money for either of those wheel brands in the foreseeable future :lol:
Image
Kiwi-Corolla
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1492
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 3:41 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Dell'Orto » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:53 pm

I got my Tom's C3R's for a hundy with shitty kingstars on em...non car people dont think much of old 15's, so they're worth next to nothing 2ndhand.
Bodyroll is fairly minimal, but I have replaced all the suspension in it
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby molex » Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:31 pm

Body roll with the same rolling circumference is going to be identical assuming the same tire pressures and similar tire construction.

As increasing the rolling circumference more than a small margin is illegal and just generally not a very good idea, I fail to see how an appropriately sized 15" wheel and tire combo (e.g 195/50/15's) is going to result in any difference (other than visual I suppose) in ride height.

You should try bolting on my set of Racing Hart CP-035's with 205/50/15's and see what you think. Take it for a fang and then tell me you don't want 15's ;)

BTW I bought those for $700 with brand new Toyo T1R's, there are plenty of NICE, original Japanese performance wheels out there. Psssst, check honda forums :p
molex
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby BZG Wagon » Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:36 pm

molex wrote:As increasing the rolling circumference more than a small margin is illegal and just generally not a very good idea, I fail to see how an appropriately sized 15" wheel and tire combo (e.g 195/50/15's) is going to result in any difference (other than visual I suppose) in ride height.

Agree - my 17's with 215/45 tyres were virtually identical in diameter to my 15's with 215/60's (from memory that was the size).

I would argue it made the ride firmer and a lot less forgiving.
User avatar
BZG Wagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Waitakere City, Auckland.

Postby rollaholic » Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:55 pm

molex wrote:Body roll with the same rolling circumference is going to be identical assuming the same tire pressures and similar tire construction.

As increasing the rolling circumference more than a small margin is illegal and just generally not a very good idea, I fail to see how an appropriately sized 15" wheel and tire combo (e.g 195/50/15's) is going to result in any difference (other than visual I suppose) in ride height.

You should try bolting on my set of Racing Hart CP-035's with 205/50/15's and see what you think. Take it for a fang and then tell me you don't want 15's ;)

BTW I bought those for $700 with brand new Toyo T1R's, there are plenty of NICE, original Japanese performance wheels out there. Psssst, check honda forums :p


QFT
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby Lurkin » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:25 pm

Racing Hart CP-035's with 205/50/15's and see what you think.


YES. WIN.
Past casualties
1986 4age liftback (sold)
1985 4age aw11 (well crunched)
1993 ae101 gt apex levin (sold)
Lurkin
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:25 pm

Postby rollaholic » Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:39 am

may be considered played out by some, but a timeless classic IMHO

http://nzhondas.com/wheels/130841-r888s ... te37s.html
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Previous

Return to Polls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests