Yes.... that sole FWD (so far) vote is me...
But a lot of people that pan FWD's mercilessly have never had the opportunity to step inside a well set up one and go for a thrash. The majority of Japanese FWD's are not sorted chassis wise... they are understeery horrible things that struggle to get mid-corner traction... (OK so the traction issue is a feature of any high power FWD)
Not to be blowing my own trumpet here or anything, but IMO the Europeans have the idea of a well handling FWD down pat... the Sud is a perfect example of this, you can throw it through corners with complete confidence, understeer is only present at the EXTREME limit, and it's more likely to oversteer when you lift off, such is the neutral bias of the chassis. As such, I am yet to drive another car that is so fun (and involving) through a set of corners, even the RWD cars I have driven (from Falcodores, to Alfas, to Nissans, to Escorts.... all sorts) haven't provided as much driving satisfaction as the wee Sud.
Any doubters and I'm happy to take you for a ride over the Port Hills.
IMO people are overrating a car because of its ability to drift or do skids, rather than the actual driving experience.
But what I'm really trying to say is I guess, there's good and bad of both types of cars.... would you say an BA Falcon gives the "feel of a sports car" when compared to say, an Integra Type R?