Principles of flight?

Burning questions of the day answered by the Toyspeed populace

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Can the Plane Take Off

Yes
41
48%
No
31
36%
Flying is an unholy abomination and will result in eternal damnation for all those that attempt it
13
15%
 
Total votes : 85

Postby Bridget » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:32 pm

I'd be keen for an experiment :twisted:
Bridget
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby Brick » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:34 pm

MrOizo wrote:
Brick wrote:
argueing on the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win your still a retard
:roll: :lol:


its not really arguing, its more of a debate :)

yea or that :wink:
id say as soon as get gets to wat ever speed it needs to to get enough lift to rise it will, but as soon as its lost that help from the belt it wud lose to much speed and fall down after 2 seconds :o
User avatar
Brick
I know Kung Fu
 
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:41 pm
Location: ChCh

Postby ollieboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:34 pm

geishaboy wrote:I can't believe I waded through three pages of this sh*t

There is only one *one* 1 way to know for sure

And that is a pratical experiment

I'm keen if you are :D


Im keen as well :lol:
User avatar
ollieboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:35 pm

MrOizo wrote:
no_8wire wrote:
MrOizo wrote:if there was no friction in the wheels then the plane should sit there at 0 km/h ground speed. the plane could then accelerate up to take off speed.

i guess this question depends what variables you want to include.

yes it could accelerate its take off speed. however it still wouldnt be moving and therefore not creating any lift force/ real air speed...therefore its supposed "takeoff" speed would be non exsistant...


no no no... the ground speed and air speed would both be 0.

it then accelerates to lift off velocity. and walla... take off :)

and what ever take off velocity was, double that and thats the velovity of the surface of the wheels of the aircraft.

Its lift off velocity is depedant on the amount of air/speed of air under wings.
If the plane is not moving as its velocity on the belt is "0" effectivly( speed plane-speed belt = 0).

There is no way therefore that the plane could reach a speed to take off, as no matter what speed it was it still wouldnt be moving, and there would be no air movement to creat lift.
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:37 pm

Brick wrote:
argueing on the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win your still a retard
:roll: :lol:

I prefer to think of it as discusing theory....
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby Bridget » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:38 pm

well I give up, lol
Bridget
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby geishaboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:38 pm

ollieboy wrote:
geishaboy wrote:I can't believe I waded through three pages of this sh*t

There is only one *one* 1 way to know for sure

And that is a pratical experiment

I'm keen if you are :D


Im keen as well :lol:


Seriously man

All I have seen so far is "it will/won't take off because my website/text book told me so!"

Allthough, it would probably be very difficult to actually do in real life
User avatar
geishaboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:37 pm
Location: Osaka

Postby ollieboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:39 pm

no_8wire wrote:
MrOizo wrote:
no_8wire wrote:
MrOizo wrote:if there was no friction in the wheels then the plane should sit there at 0 km/h ground speed. the plane could then accelerate up to take off speed.

i guess this question depends what variables you want to include.

yes it could accelerate its take off speed. however it still wouldnt be moving and therefore not creating any lift force/ real air speed...therefore its supposed "takeoff" speed would be non exsistant...


no no no... the ground speed and air speed would both be 0.

it then accelerates to lift off velocity. and walla... take off :)

and what ever take off velocity was, double that and thats the velovity of the surface of the wheels of the aircraft.

Its lift off velocity is depedant on the amount of air/speed of air under wings.
If the plane is not moving as its velocity on the belt is "0" effectivly( speed plane-speed belt = 0).

There is no way therefore that the plane could reach a speed to take off, as no matter what speed it was it still wouldnt be moving, and there would be no air movement to creat lift.


I dont want to sound like a penis but just to correct that the lift is dependant on the air above the wings believe it or not.
User avatar
ollieboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Postby Bridget » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:39 pm

Very difficult to do in real life... but I think someone should at least try it the a toy plane... haha
Last edited by Bridget on Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bridget
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:39 pm

so fivebob what is YOUR answer?
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby V8MOFO » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:41 pm

lets see now, The whole point of the travelator is that the plane doesn't move. Otherwise there is no point to the question.
I think what you are missing, is that this is a physics question on how lift works, not a question on how planes work.
Like I said before, engines dont blow air over wings, they counter drag.

Now, the plane is not moving relative to the air. Here is a little equation to work out the lift.
Image

Without air velocity there is no lift. You can give it all the thrust you want in horizontal direction but it simply wont fly.[/img]
Last edited by V8MOFO on Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Anger is seldom without argument but seldom with a good one.
Image
Image Fact of the day: I have only updated my fact of the day on time, Three times.
User avatar
V8MOFO
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:39 am
Location: I am crazy...

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:42 pm

YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby ollieboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:44 pm

no_8wire wrote:YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!


come one, thats what I was trying to say ages ago. :P
User avatar
ollieboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:44 pm

ollieboy wrote:
no_8wire wrote:
MrOizo wrote:
no_8wire wrote:
MrOizo wrote:if there was no friction in the wheels then the plane should sit there at 0 km/h ground speed. the plane could then accelerate up to take off speed.

i guess this question depends what variables you want to include.

yes it could accelerate its take off speed. however it still wouldnt be moving and therefore not creating any lift force/ real air speed...therefore its supposed "takeoff" speed would be non exsistant...


no no no... the ground speed and air speed would both be 0.

it then accelerates to lift off velocity. and walla... take off :)

and what ever take off velocity was, double that and thats the velovity of the surface of the wheels of the aircraft.

Its lift off velocity is depedant on the amount of air/speed of air under wings.
If the plane is not moving as its velocity on the belt is "0" effectivly( speed plane-speed belt = 0).

There is no way therefore that the plane could reach a speed to take off, as no matter what speed it was it still wouldnt be moving, and there would be no air movement to creat lift.


I dont want to sound like a penis but just to correct that the lift is dependant on the air above the wings believe it or not.

Sorry I should have completed the sentance...dependant on the difference of velocity between the air flow over& under the wing
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby ollieboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:46 pm

ollieboy wrote:
no_8wire wrote:YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!


come on, thats what I was trying to say ages ago. :P
User avatar
ollieboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Postby V8MOFO » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:47 pm

ollieboy wrote:
no_8wire wrote:YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!


come one, thats what I was trying to say ages ago. :P


ooh nom you joined the dark side. :P
Anger is seldom without argument but seldom with a good one.
Image
Image Fact of the day: I have only updated my fact of the day on time, Three times.
User avatar
V8MOFO
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:39 am
Location: I am crazy...

Postby Bridget » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:48 pm

I declare I don't care no more, I'm burning up and out and growing bored... lol *sigh* this is crap I don't want to think about it anymore.
Bridget
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:49 pm

ollieboy wrote:
ollieboy wrote:
no_8wire wrote:YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!


come on, thats what I was trying to say ages ago. :P

okay then WE understand! ( OB, N8, V8 )
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

Postby ollieboy » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:52 pm

no_8wire wrote:
ollieboy wrote:
ollieboy wrote:
no_8wire wrote:YAH some one UNDERSTANDS!!!!!!!!!!


come on, thats what I was trying to say ages ago. :P

okay then WE understand! ( OB, N8, V8 )


Cool, Hey I double posted when I was correcting a spelling mistake :oops:
User avatar
ollieboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Postby no_8wire » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:56 pm

which time? :lol:
User avatar
no_8wire
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:30 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Polls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests