Moderator: The Mod Squad
heh, link suck. looks like they dont have a suitable engine management system for my car.
Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
fivebob wrote:Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
So will a Link plus cost you $6600? as the difference in price between the base units is only $1400.
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
nemesis wrote:Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
Who's "they"? If you install a MoTeC as a piggyback system it won't affect any of the stock systems at all. The stock ECU plays nicely in terms of sharing the key sensors (and is the only aftermarket ECU that will, AFAIK, will a Link plus interface with the stock crank angle and cam position sensors?).
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Mmm, Boost wrote:fivebob wrote:Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
So will a Link plus cost you $6600? as the difference in price between the base units is only $1400.
Only $1400 pocket change!
fivebob wrote:Mmm, Boost wrote:fivebob wrote:Inane wrote:except getting a motec will cost me around $8k all up as I have a tiptronic GTT and they havent done one before...
I think I'll go for a link plus...
So will a Link plus cost you $6600? as the difference in price between the base units is only $1400.
Only $1400 pocket change!
Precisely correct, though I suspect you were trying to be sarcastic
The $1400 difference (I could get it cheaper than that but I was quoting retail) is nothing when you compare it to the cost of a blown motor and would hardly cover the install costs, let alone the cost of the motor and the inconvenience of not having your car. Not that I'm saying using a Link will result in a blown motor, just that the chances are greater.
Nor indeed does it compare to the cost of the quoted complete install. My point was, are people charging $6600 to install a Link Plus? I doubt it as they wouldn't get much business, so the $8000 for a Motec install is either the installer getting greedy, or allowing far more time than is necessary because they've never seen a GT-T before and have no idea what's involved. While the cost of the Motec is a greater % of the initial total, the rest of the install should be the same. What's more the Motec will not devalue, not that you'd ever sell it as it's flexible enough to run most features and firmware upgrades are free and user installable.
BTW how is the Link Plus at interfacing to the transmission for shift points etc or running large, low impedance, injectors at idle?
Perhaps you can tell me how I can insert the RPM or MAP points in so I can control the engine properly when there is a large volumetric efficiency change or a point in the map, like idle, where transition is adversely affected by the points around it? Or indeed how to set end of injection timing so I don't waste fuel? I've downloaded the software but I can't seem to find these, IMHO necessary, features.
Actually I could go on listing the features that the Link doesn't have, there are many, but that just goes to prove you get what you pay for I suppose, and if you're prepared to live with these deficiencies then there is nothing wrong with the Link
Sarcasm aside, if your budget only extends to a Link Plus and you only want to run a mildly modified engine, then I will admit that that's better than running the stock ECU. However, if your goals are more lofty (or may be so in the future) then save the extra money and buy a Motec, you'll never regret it, and it may well turn out cheaper in the long run.
The problem is that people on this board have a very short term view of things, especially when it comes to spending money. Given the average age that is to be expected, I’m just trying to pass on the benefit of what I’ve learnt over the years, and that is that cost is the last thing you should consider when playing with high performance engines, and if what you need to do the job is beyond your budget, then you should save up and not accept something that will not do the job properly. It will just end up costing you more in both real money terms and the frustration of having to the job properly the second time around. If I hadn’t wasted money in the past on “cheap” solutions I’d be able to afford that 288 GTO I want
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests