ELECTRIC SUPERCHARGER FOR ANY CAR !!

[phatman3801]

http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/0001 ... 111041.htm take a look at this, tell me wot u guys think, ne 1 tryed one of these??

[Lloyd]

Already discussed somewhere on here. Not worth the trouble. Big thing on NZHondas about it too if ya wanna have a search there

[Adydas]

man by that guys understanding buying like 8 of them and youd out power a GTR or SUPRA!!!

QUICK SOMEONE buy a 400 buck car and like 8 of them and do flat 5s

your get ALL the bitches

[badidas]

there was a rite uo in farst fours and there was no doubt they worked but more worry that people would buy them without thinking about upgrading fuel mangment

[Leon]

it's bull.

[Ae92typeX]

lol he's still selling them... I thought he would have quit the other week after all the comments he got.

If you were going to consider buying an electric supercharger, I beleave there are beter units on the market. That one is fairly low amperage and going by that, low power.

[Inane]

www.electricsupercharger.com

seems like it should do what they claim,

the maths works out right anyway,

1 psi boost, with an electric supercharger that is pulling 59amps.

the real question is,

WHY BOTHER?

[Leon]

for gods sake, lock this thread!!!

We've done this topic to death a number of times.

It goes around and around, then somebody links to the text of a page that debunks the claims, demonstrating the actual level of electical power needed to create any boost.

Everyone then stands around saying "Oh okay, so it's bull".

Die thread die.

[Inane]

Actually the link to where it debunks the claims, states that you would need around 60 amps...

see my previous post.

I would have thought it was _total_ bull until as I had seen various places that debunks the claims, before I had seen www.electricsupercharger.com

From ElectricSupercharger.com
"The eRAM produces less than ½ PSI, but also rids the system of about ½ PSI of vacuum caused by filter and inlet restriction. These two gains give the eRAM its 1PSI supercharging performance results. "

The eRAM draws 57.8 AMPs @ 12 volts, so around 684 watts.

page debunking the theory is looking at a very different product,

they actually suggest the E-Ram as something worth looking at
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2063/article.html

There is a page debunking the theory on AutoSpeed, but that is regarding the Twin-Turbo Zet, (resembles a couple of computer cooling fans)
And that is talking about something providing 12-14 psi,

which if you do the Math against their figures (divide the power required figures down, so that its only what you would need for 1/2 a psi) then it actually all adds up.


Thats the whole point I'm trying to make

[Stealer Of Souls]

1PSI...
What a waste of time....
It should work as it says it does... the maths looks right, the theory seems right... but again...
What a waste of time...

[Inane]

Those Super E-Rams on www.electricsupercharger.com look kinda cool,

could provide a bit of orginal "bling" for your engine bay,

gawd knows why someone would buy one for performance reasons.

[gt4mike]

People go to lots of trouble with antilag, which most of the time is lucky to make you very much boost.... providing a pressurised supply of air to the turbo certainly would have benefit's I'd think - just like people have intake ducts to try and force air in when the car is moving. 1psi from 1000rpm could be quite useful.

Like others have said tho, a lot of the fans out there claiming to make a difference are a joke. The ones on electricsupercharger.com look like they would do the biz tho.

[Inane]

they do look like they would do the job,

or you could invest $500, build a pulse jet,
strap it onto the back of your car,

use it as effective "anti-lag"

hehehe