Dot 5.1

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Dot 5.1

Postby Dell'Orto » Thu May 12, 2005 10:51 pm

Now, shortly I'll be doing my brake system, and I want to use dot 5.1 brake fluid.
What hassles are there, and are there any special procedures needed to run dot 5.1 after previously using dot 4?
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Adamal » Thu May 12, 2005 10:54 pm

As far as I know, all new DOT ratings that come out and 'compatable' with systems that use the previous rating.
They typically say "Use at least DOTX"

Much like oil!
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Lloyd » Thu May 12, 2005 11:05 pm

But 5.1 is different. Why exactly do you want to use it? Its pretty much for race applications and thats about it.
User avatar
Lloyd
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 6195
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 1:50 pm
Location: Dunedin

Postby Malcolm » Thu May 12, 2005 11:15 pm

yeah, there is very little reason to switch to 5.1 on a street car unless you want to be completely flushing the system annually
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby 85AW20v » Thu May 12, 2005 11:24 pm

Have alook in FAQ - the post at the bottom of the list - all about brakes, fluids etc. Explains it all very simply.
See ya

Simon
85 MR2 20v
User avatar
85AW20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 6:18 pm
Location: Taupo, NZ

Postby Dell'Orto » Thu May 12, 2005 11:40 pm

Its not for the KE70 by any means :lol:
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby pc » Fri May 13, 2005 9:22 am

Should be no problems using dot 5.1 I'm assuming you will be using synthetic and not silicon fluid.
The fluid just costs a bit more. Other than that, you probably wont notice any difference over dot 4.
red car
1/4 mile - 14.683s @ 91.83mph
Manfield - 1:24s
Taupo - Track1 1:53s (road tyres) - Track2 1:22s - Track3 48s (with esses) - Track4 1:58s
User avatar
pc
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Hutt Yo!

Postby Dell'Orto » Fri May 13, 2005 11:53 am

Thing is, I do intend to give my car a bit of a burn round Manfeild once completed, maybe a few times even ;) I'd like something that isnt going to boil itself into nothingness after 6 laps.
I figure heavyish car with a fair bit of power, its gonna get the brakes hot.
Still undecided as to which pads to use too, kinda leaning towards EBC green stuff.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby wde_bdy » Fri May 13, 2005 12:15 pm

Race Brakes have what you need, ELF’s XT3167 . Their site also has a very detailed explanation of all the different fluid levels and other brake options. May be the same as whats in the FAQ from memory.

http://www.0800brakes.co.nz/

Have a chat to them about Mintex pads too.

Callum
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby vvega » Fri May 13, 2005 2:58 pm

5.1 is compatable with your exsiting fuilids
its not a silicon based fluid and dose not need to be flushed yearly
the most important aspect of 5.1 is it boiling point helping to reduce fade

:S

v
vvega
 

Postby TygerTung » Fri May 13, 2005 3:33 pm

The problem with 5.1, is that it doesn't absorb moisture.

All braking systems produce moisture, and since it's not abosorbed, you'll just have a bit of water in there. This will boil very easily, so then you'll just get bad brake fade.

I'd recomend a good racing dot 4 fluid.

You can get Motul factory line Racing brake fluid for a decent price.
TygerTung
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Christchurch.co.nz

Postby pc » Fri May 13, 2005 5:21 pm

The problem with 5.1, is that it doesn't absorb moisture.


Only if it's silicone based, as it's not, then it will absorb the moisture. dot 5.1 has a slightly higher boiling point than dot 4 so in theory it will be better.
I personally think all brake fluids should be flushed yearly, but that's just personal preference.
red car
1/4 mile - 14.683s @ 91.83mph
Manfield - 1:24s
Taupo - Track1 1:53s (road tyres) - Track2 1:22s - Track3 48s (with esses) - Track4 1:58s
User avatar
pc
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Hutt Yo!

Postby wde_bdy » Fri May 13, 2005 6:10 pm

TygerTung wrote:The problem with 5.1, is that it doesn't absorb moisture.


You are confused with DOT 5, which is silicone based. DOT 5.1 is generally for synthetic (not silicone) fluids and is the highest rating available.

Callum
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby vvega » Fri May 13, 2005 6:20 pm

100% correct
but in saying that i belive the silicone based product is still better
5.1 is great fuild used it in my bikes for years with much hard abuse cabt rate it highly enough

and yes 5.1 is hydroscopic

braking systems dont produce mositure they absorb it...hence hydroscopic.........

anywasy back to the mindless babble
vvega
 

Postby Dell'Orto » Fri May 13, 2005 6:29 pm

vvega wrote:but in saying that i belive the silicone based product is still better


Why is that? I was lead to believe it makes the pedal kinda spongy due to the compressability of the fluid?
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby Truenotch » Fri May 13, 2005 6:43 pm

Brad never use silicone brake fluid!!! Have a look on the ebc site theres some stuff about what yoou should and shouldn't use, silicone fluids is not supposed to be used because when the brakes get hot the water produced gets trapped and makes the padal do nought.
User avatar
Truenotch
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Hamilton

Postby Truenotch » Fri May 13, 2005 6:54 pm

http://www.0800brakes.co.nz/pg8.htm

Looks like dot 5.1 would be sweet.
User avatar
Truenotch
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Hamilton

Postby vvega » Fri May 13, 2005 9:10 pm

Mmm, Boost wrote:
vvega wrote:but in saying that i belive the silicone based product is still better


Why is that? I was lead to believe it makes the pedal kinda spongy due to the compressability of the fluid?


from my understanding silicon fuild is spose to be changed on a per meeting basis
silicon also ahs a trumendously high boiling point ...obviously dependant on what you buy as per anything

you also cant mix the 2 fuilids tends to turn to stringy slimmy stuff :D

v
vvega
 

Postby Perky » Tue May 17, 2005 6:03 pm

You are confused with DOT 5, which is silicone based. DOT 5.1 is generally for synthetic (not silicone) fluids and is the highest rating available.


Exactly. 5.1 was obviously a bloody stupid name to use since it always causes this confusion. I take it that the DOT numbers were originally intended to specify the fluid's characteristics rather than its composition -- but then they were also supposed to guarantee compatibility :roll: . Presumably this is why some brands, such as Castrol, market a Super DOT 4, which they recommend for applications requiring DOT 5.1. The DOT boiling points are actually minimum values, so a DOT 4 can have the same or higher boiling points as DOT 5.1. I use DOT 5.1 because it is also supposed to be a bit thinner and more suitable for ABS equipped systems, but I doubt that anyone has ever had a problem using DOT 4.
Perky
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby dimmy » Wed May 18, 2005 3:29 pm

i can't remember the exact reason but once you go to dot 5.1 you can't go back to dot 4, i'm 97% sure of this. :)
dimmy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:22 pm
Location: christchurch

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests