Ok, this is more me trying to get an answer with some real thought behind it than anything.
Ok, one thing I see written on here is that you don't go over 2.25" for a 1600cc exhaust. Its something I see everywhere, but the only reason for it is "backpressure is good, you lose torque by going too big"
But... Hang on. My poor wee brain can't make sense out of that - isn't the least restriction best?
How does backpressure HELP make power?
The theory for a turbo car is: bigger is better. Makes sense. Cut the exhaust off my city turbo and it flew, and no way in hell it had LOST any low end torque. Ditto with the VR4 - but, still, thats a turbocharged car, so things work differently.
Back to the n/a side of things... How does a smaller exhaust help? Why would 2" be called restrictive, but 3" be called overkill - is it just noise concerns? Even if you lose some low end, surely your not aiming for low end torque in a 1600cc engine anyway?
Sorry if it sounds dumb, just this has been bugging me for a while and noone can give me a definate answer!