Moderator: The Mod Squad
fivebob wrote:It may work, it is a mass flow sensor, but IIRC the temperature sensor component of the AFM may be limited to <50degC and even then the stock ECU (if that's what you're using) won't have the necessary temperature compensations to cope, unless it also has a manifold temp sensor in the system.
slighty_sykotic wrote:And are you sure its a mass flow sensor? Not a volume one?
Of course it's a mass flow sensor. Each molecule of air (well not exactly as air is a mixture) at a known temp will produce a known force acting on the flap. An increase the number of molecules will increase the force, resulting in a greater deflection of the flap. Also higher temps will mean the molecules will strike the surface of the flap with greater energy, not sure how that will affect the reading though.
jondee86 wrote:Of course it's a mass flow sensor. Each molecule of air (well not exactly as air is a mixture) at a known temp will produce a known force acting on the flap. An increase the number of molecules will increase the force, resulting in a greater deflection of the flap. Also higher temps will mean the molecules will strike the surface of the flap with greater energy, not sure how that will affect the reading though.
What have you been smoking dude![]()
An AFM measures airflow (or volume/time) and the mass flow is
calculated by the ECU using separate temperature and (possibly)
barometric pressure sensor inputs.
slighty_sykotic wrote:hmm, thats sweet then. Im planning on 8-10 max at the moment, so you reckon it will be sweet left as stock with a blow through?
If so, great news
--Sykotic
All_Fours wrote:II have heard a lot of conjecture about whether the AFM measures mass flow or volumetric flow. Most evidence I've seen suggests it's a volumetric device.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 14 guests