Safc with silvertop?

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Safc with silvertop?

Postby trueno_20v » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:06 pm

Im looking at getting a safc for my trueno (silvertop 4age) just wondering if anyone has had one tuned on there 20v and if its worth it and what sort of power gains do you get? Atm i have extractors, exhaust and intake.
ADMIN EDIT: signature too large
User avatar
trueno_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:12 pm

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:31 pm

well, actually I have not had it "proffesionally" tuned, but from my experience if it only sit there (all settings are at 0, meaning that it has no effect), my quarter mile time was worse then when I completely unpluged it! Also no matter what I set in there did not had much effect, and result on dyno was less then without, I've to set it to have ~13 to 1 ratio, and still no gain what so ever, I also tried richer and leaner (12 and 14 to 1), In fact as it sat there at best I lost probably about 2kw (marginal but still). But my silver top at that stage was not completely stock...
"Performance" mods where when I had SAFC:
Cold air intake (from bumper)
Apexi 4to1 extractors
2 1/4 exhaust
Black top cams
Mine's ECU

At the end I just sold it, infact when I got rid of it I got better fuel economy (extra 50-70k out of tank), more torque down low and got rid of that 3800rpm flat spot. I had it for over a year...
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby trueno_20v » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:39 pm

Ohok and what sort of power was that motor making and 1/4 mile times???????
ADMIN EDIT: signature too large
User avatar
trueno_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:12 pm

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:10 pm

my best time was 16 flat thats including all the stuff in the boot (subs and amps) and my very slow shifts .. best power was 70kw at the wheels (done @ shore performance :oops: )
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby trueno_20v » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:14 pm

sergei wrote:my best time was 16 flat thats including all the stuff in the boot (subs and amps) and my very slow shifts .. best power was 70kw at the wheels (done @ shore performance :oops: )

trap speed?
ADMIN EDIT: signature too large
User avatar
trueno_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:12 pm

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:49 pm

rt 0.141 et 16.00 134kph
thats from memory, I'll have to find the slips to see 60ft time...
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby trueno_20v » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:23 pm

Thats weird for your power and trap speeds with all those mods ecu etc, my car only has exhaust extractors and intake pipe and im doing 16 flats @ 87-88mph (about 145k?) with sh*t launches..
ADMIN EDIT: signature too large
User avatar
trueno_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:12 pm

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:50 pm

thats why I bought GT4... Too much money spent without any results..
my AE101 has:
Mine's ECU (9000rpm rev limiter)
Blacktop cams
Blacktop trumpets/plenium
Apexi 4in1
CAI
2-1/4 exhaust
Oil cooler
4 puck Exedy clutch
6 speed BZR box
and something else that I forgot...

End reslut is that is fun to drive it, but my ST165 is way more enjoyable and faster for same money...
20valves are overrated! (both from Toyota and general public)
I don't like hondas but B16 will kick 20v ass anytime.
Toyota did a big mistake by putting 150Hp motor in a FWD 1250Kg car and put a GT badge on it!
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby RomanV » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:02 pm

Wow, they arent that heavy, are they? 8O
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby Mr Revhead » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:53 pm

not usually!

are you sure there wasnt something wrong with yours sergei?
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby gazza_jay » Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:32 pm

well if my car weighs that much and the small mods Ive done hell I think I got a rocket 4 a 1600 lol that means their must be slow hondas... seriously they cant be that heavy.. and i seen a safc of a blacktop and I seen he has got some good gains everywhere..
gazza_jay
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: Palmy north

Postby trueno_20v » Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:44 pm

i wieghed mine it was 1060. :)
ADMIN EDIT: signature too large
User avatar
trueno_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:12 pm

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:50 pm

I'm sure there is nothing wrong with mine, it probably had cambelt off 5 times (3 new cambelts), so that is not timing issue, it measured 14bar in each cylinder before i did dyno, tried different ECU (still slow POS). As I said I gave up, as poured money into it without getting any gains. Last time when I checked they where 1150kg dry. So to add rubbish and petrol and driver it is going to be near 1300kg..
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Mr Revhead » Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:19 pm

maybe someone poured lead into the chassis rails!
i no if mine did a 16 flat as it is now id be uner the bonnet looking for the problem 8O

but yeah they arnt fast cars, but they are fast for what they are
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby sergei » Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:30 pm

Come to think of it I'll give it a try on next after next night drags (as on first one I'll be taking my GT4)
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Ako » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:26 am

Mr Revhead wrote:maybe someone poured lead into the chassis rails!
i no if mine did a 16 flat as it is now id be uner the bonnet looking for the problem 8O

but yeah they arnt fast cars, but they are fast for what they are



The catch cry of slow car owners everywhere!

B16A's are fast for what they are. 20V's were asleep when the car gods were handing out go faster pills.


Theres a silvertop down here who came out the the drags a few times, ran 16 flat consistently, made a proper cold air box up and it dropped to consistent 15.5's. Worth looking at.

ON the topic at hand, I'd say the s-afc had no effect on your car sergei since the mines ECU had already done all the fine tuning you could get away with. On a stock ECU and slightly modified car, there's sure to be gains to be had with some fuel tinkering.
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:40 am

are the b16as the vtec ones?

no not a catch cry.... i mean what 1600cc car really is fast in the broad scheme of things? if you compare them to ferraris then they are slow.... compare them to 1600ccs then they are fast, the only thing the hondas have over them is weight, or lack of it. they are close enough that the driver is more important

ppl who say 20vs are crap are just ignorant
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby RomanV » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:53 am

I can vouch for the fact that a well driven blacktop has a bit of go. 8O

Ive driven a silvertop in an FXGT with intake/exhaust, it seemed to go rather well, but nothing overly amazing.

But when it comes to NA and small engine performance, honda = win.
The toyota motors are good, but the honda engines are just better, and respond far better to mods.
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby EVL GSXR » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:56 am

They are Crap I would take an old skool Red or Blue Top 4AGE over a 20V anyday.. And yes Honda's are abit lighter but there engine in general own's a 20V end of story..
www.lowndvs.co.nz

1997 GSXR750 - 11.23 @ 128mph to date - Round 280kph Top Speed to date
http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/profile.php?id=793
User avatar
EVL GSXR
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Ice Land

Postby Mr Revhead » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:59 am

its not as clear cut as that

when talking mods then vtec is negated as you can alter cams in the toyotas. easier to get a broader power band with vtec though.
when your talking mods theres no real advantage to either... but theres way more toyotas in racing.....

but you gotta be fair.... no point comparing an ae101 to a 96 civic....
a fair comparison is the 89-93 (?) integra with 1600 vtec, in that example the ae101 is the better car.
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 14 guests