Moderator: The Mod Squad
RomanV wrote:Yeah, but the question is whether or not an NA whale would be just as greedy when it's cold.
MrOizo wrote:my JZA70 supra was easier on the gas than the AW11 going to plamy.
Easily get 600km/tank in the supra. filled up twice in the AW11 (1.5 tanks)
Mr.Phreak wrote:Silent Knight wrote:Soarer compared to Soarer....no.
FI Soarer uses far more gas than N/A whether it be hot or cold.
If that's the case, I feel really sorry for you
fivebob wrote:At the same HP levels a turbo engine is more efficient, because it makes it's power lower down in the rev range so therefore has more torque. However when you're not using that torque to good effect (e.g. round town driving), then the NA would likely be more efficient, as it can be run leaner without reliability issues.
MrOizo wrote:my JZA70 supra was easier on the gas than the AW11 going to plamy.
Easily get 600km/tank in the supra. filled up twice in the AW11 (1.5 tanks)
RomanV wrote:Well, would a turbo engine be more efficient, on short trips?
As I would imagine that the extra heat generated by the turbo, which is cooled by athe same water/oil that the engine uses, would help expedite the warming up process.
Is there any truth to this?
*When I have a car, that is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests