Moderator: The Mod Squad
Chickenman wrote:
It was a totally theoretical situation.. if you aren't supposed to use your engine to brake (as someone else stated in this thread) then you wouldn't be changing down anyway and cruising around in 5th.
As soon as you change down whilst slowing you are initiating engine braking.
So to drive without using engine braking you would have to put it in neutral/hold the clutch in and brake into the corner... where you would spinout as you tried to put it in gear to continue.
FFS, can't anyone use their brain these days.
Unless you heel toe, but apparently that's impossible if you dont engine brake.
DB4G63 wrote:Hi All
My only gripe is living in hilly Dunedin when driving down a hill, changing gears to slow down does well.... bugger all. Even knocking her into second just makes her growl and well not really slow down much. Changing down in traffic is about as pointless, I feel myself overusing the brakes like (dare I say it ).... a dirty auto...
DB4G63 wrote:My only gripe is living in hilly Dunedin
RomanV wrote:beeker wrote:I suggest you research your topics prior to making such statements. I've been on so many courses over the years and every professional instructors states such.
I've been surfing at beaches like Piha and Bethels for several years, and you can tell who does, and doesnt engine brake; by who's brakes are on fire by the time they get to the bottom of the hill.
Do you suggest that they dont drive down hills, as it obviously "isnt designed for that"?
AE85coupe wrote:i just always figured brake pads are cheap
gearboxes/drivetrains are not
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Mmm, Boost wrote:AE85coupe wrote:i just always figured brake pads are cheap
gearboxes/drivetrains are not
Too bloody right...my step dad always told me I should use the engine more than the brakes, and that was always my reply.
RomanV wrote:I dont understand on what basis you guys think that engine braking is bad for your car.
RomanV wrote:How do you know that the gearboxes were damaged by engine braking?
I could understand that intentionally shock loading the gearbox (for the sake of compression locking etc) in the opposite direction could make bad things happen, and I wouldnt be surprised if a gearbox or two blew up doing this.
However engine braking in a sensible manner, not dumping the clutch out etc, I dont see how it could cause problems, and in my personal experience (including everyone I know, pretty much) it hasnt caused any problems.
Also, some trucks are designed with engine braking in mind. How would the gearbox design differ, to a regular car etc? Not being a smart ass, just curious.
RomanV wrote:Yes but you also use a rudder to steer that thing, we're talking about cars here.
RomanV wrote:Mmm, Boost wrote:AE85coupe wrote:i just always figured brake pads are cheap
gearboxes/drivetrains are not
Too bloody right...my step dad always told me I should use the engine more than the brakes, and that was always my reply.
Says the guy with 4Ks and K50s
Getting an engine for half a pack of ciggarettes isnt what I'd call expensive.
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests