bling Turbo inlet manifolds

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

bling Turbo inlet manifolds

Postby Donor » Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:44 pm

Hi there, I was looking at buying this manifold on trademe, for my 4agze turbo

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motor ... 674812.htm

why are they better than the 4age ones or do they just look very nice lol. what about the log type ones?

thanks for any input
Donor
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:53 pm

Postby bluemaumau » Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:32 pm

4AGTE AE101 COROLLA - 90%

Where the $&#$% is that oil leak coming from /club

looking for enkei RP01 center caps (white)
User avatar
bluemaumau
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4087
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: SYDNEY, NSW

Postby QikStarlie » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:04 pm

depends what it looks like inside,
User avatar
QikStarlie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: lost..

Postby Adydas » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:08 am

Thats not how the concept of "bling" works..
User avatar
Adydas
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 5059
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Auckland nz

Postby IH8TEC » Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:10 pm

if you want bling, get actiondan who made that one, to make one of his handbeaten ones, that my friend is damn nice. as seen on his old ae101 4agte.
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby Donor » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:56 pm

thanks guys,

but I was actually wondering why they are better than the stock n/a ones?, I see on some rb26 manifolds etc they make one end smaller than the other, why is this? are the runner tubes the same length inside the box or differant?

what Im tryning to say is, is there a performance advantage with a tapered off in/mani compared to a stock one

no body Ive asked with them on there cars can really explain to me why they are better, thats why I just thought they are a W@$#k thing

ideas,discussion???

ta
Donor
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:53 pm

Postby IH8TEC » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:39 pm

a rough explaination is that is delivers the same amount of air to all cylinders, unlike factory ones which tend to not do this to a degree.

more knowledgeable people can explain it better though :D
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby Crampy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:57 pm

The larger plenum chamber is needed for a turbo car.
I think the general rule of thumb for plenum size is twice the engine capacity.
User avatar
Crampy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Hobsonville, Auckland

Postby method » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:18 pm

Longer intake runners will increase torque at lower RPM by increasing the air velocity.
PICS UPDATED DAILY
Evo IV - 13.0 @ 167.8 kph Full street trim - SOLD
Boosted 4age Ke30 - Im back and better than ever!
User avatar
method
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby QikStarlie » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:54 pm

big gains if they are made properly, and to suit your engine. big waste of money if not,
theres alot more too it, than a few pipes welded to another big shiny pipe. thats tapered or not.
User avatar
QikStarlie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: lost..

Postby JamesM » Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:01 pm

just a question. whats the theory behind a longer pipe causing the velocity to increase?

with a manifold that is tappered then the pressure drop increases along it.. so the air is more likely to go down the first chamber then second etc..

or is it in fact the complete opposite.. due to the taper the air velocity increases and thus more air is forced down the furtherest away chamber and so on? i think thats more likely.. but also all the intake valves are not open at the same time.. so it might not make that much difference..

the manifold design is not optiaml anyway.. with having the throttle body perpindicular to the runners.. would be better with splitters for each runner.. or the best is to have individual throttle for each runner.. (quads etc).. this way the same amount of air is taken into each runner.

but with a turbo car i dont think the manifold design would be as crucial as for an NA car.. due to the air being forced into the runners due to pressure rather than beign sucked in. so for a turbo car its more like just a pressurised chamber.

soemthing to think about?
Team Megasquirt
1984 AE86
180kW, 600Nm@wheels @ 16.5psi
User avatar
JamesM
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby QikStarlie » Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:03 pm

in most cases same applys to turbo as n/a, but yeh not all.
long runners wont increase velocity. helmholz is why runner lenghts effect power at a certen rpm.
User avatar
QikStarlie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: lost..

Postby JamesM » Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:10 am

yes i just wanted to get that cleared up re the runner length.. velocity has nothing to do with length
Team Megasquirt
1984 AE86
180kW, 600Nm@wheels @ 16.5psi
User avatar
JamesM
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Akane » Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:18 am

Talk to RedMist?

The answer is Helmholtz!

Red Mist Racing
Bunderson Desert Race Car (336)
Mitsibushi Lancer RS Rally Car
Toyota ST205 Celica GT4 rally (in the build)
www.redmist.co.nz


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_resonance

Applications
Helmholtz resonance finds application in internal combustion engines (see airbox), subwoofers and acoustics. In stringed instruments, such as the guitar and violin, the resonance curve of the instrument has the Helmholtz resonance as one of its peaks, along with other peaks coming from resonances of the vibration of the wood.
No "stance", no "hellaflush", none of that bullshit. Nothing but no grip on full boost.
http://www.lol.co.nz/ random shit.
User avatar
Akane
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 2:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby method » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:23 pm

JamesM wrote:just a question. whats the theory behind a longer pipe causing the velocity to increase?

with a manifold that is tappered then the pressure drop increases along it.. so the air is more likely to go down the first chamber then second etc..

or is it in fact the complete opposite.. due to the taper the air velocity increases and thus more air is forced down the furtherest away chamber and so on? i think thats more likely.. but also all the intake valves are not open at the same time.. so it might not make that much difference..

the manifold design is not optiaml anyway.. with having the throttle body perpindicular to the runners.. would be better with splitters for each runner.. or the best is to have individual throttle for each runner.. (quads etc).. this way the same amount of air is taken into each runner.

but with a turbo car i dont think the manifold design would be as crucial as for an NA car.. due to the air being forced into the runners due to pressure rather than beign sucked in. so for a turbo car its more like just a pressurised chamber.

soemthing to think about?


Forced induction or not the engine still sucks air in, manifold pressure is no where near enough to blow air in. Just on turbo cars there are better mods to do first before doing mods like that.

The idea is so that the cylinder doesnt have to compete for air from the next cyliner, the longer intake runner means there is more air exclusivly for that cylinder and the air is there waiting to go.

Thats the best i can explain it really.
PICS UPDATED DAILY
Evo IV - 13.0 @ 167.8 kph Full street trim - SOLD
Boosted 4age Ke30 - Im back and better than ever!
User avatar
method
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby Caveman » Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:28 pm

Does anyone know anything about these tubular intake manifolds as seen on the humble 4efe

Image

I imagine it would work pretty good? It has all the good features, even length, even flow distribution...
AW11 Track Toy
Formerly known as 1998
User avatar
Caveman
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 11:20 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby Santa'sBoostinSleigh » Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:49 pm

lol looks like a second exhaust manifold! but should work good?
Santa's Mega Sale
Santa's TardMe Listings
GTFX: viewtopic.php?t=67655
Discussion: viewtopic.php?t=67658

Some cocksmack stole one of my 5ANTA plates, if you see it please let me/the police know, ta
User avatar
Santa'sBoostinSleigh
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: 'Naki Massif

Postby vvega » Sat Dec 23, 2006 12:11 am

plenum is too small.. make it 2 litres or so and it could well be ok


v
vvega
 

Postby QikStarlie » Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:40 am

i guy in oz had a turbo 4efe with one of them. then swiched to a standard 4efte one. did a dyno before and after, gained a decent amount of power. cant remember the numbers.. but lost a little bit down low, as you would expect. due to the 4efte's shorter runners.
5efhe acis manifold is the best of the 4e/5e manifolds.
User avatar
QikStarlie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: lost..

Postby Dell'Orto » Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:44 pm

The Nissan QG18DE has a similar looking intake manifold, with 4 roughly equal length runners. Has a better plenum than the 4EFE one though, but still wouldnt be enough to make big power from.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Next

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 34 guests