fivebob wrote:What is desirable is not the torque at the flywheel calculated using some mythical drivetrain losses, it's the torque at the wheels that is produced by the engine. i.e. without the effect of gear ratios from the torque multiplier (gearbox).
I understand what you're saying, but I dont see how it's practical to do this.
For example, lets say its a saturday morning Torque Performance dyno day you're going to.
If they use roller RPM and roller torque, you get an accurate KW reading, a torque curve, and perhaps some indication of what sort of RPM your engine is doing.
They can get you on and off the dyno fairly quickly.
If you want to have the 'engine' wheel torque scale down the side, you need to precisely know what RPM the engine is doing. Now this is fine when you've got one car in there, and are tuning it for a few hours.
But if you've got a whole crap load of different cars coming in, with distributors, coil packs, etc, it becomes time consuming to figure out how to access an accurate RPM reading for each car. Without access to this, an 'engine' wheel torque figure would be useless, which is why they dont put one on.
matt dunn wrote:if you were clever enough as sat down with,
a calculator,
the dyno sheet,
the tyre dia,
the diff ratio,
the gear ratio the run was done it,
you should be able to work out the engine torque,
not allowing for roller slip, if any.
Sound like a job for redmist or fivebob.
Matt
It seems simpler to just make a new torque 'scale' down the side of the drawing. If you had an indication of the RPM, then you could use the KW figure and the RPM to work out what torque it's making at that point on the graph, and do this a few times to work out the new scale. But yeah, its a PITA to do I suppose.