Malcolm wrote:yes, and if an arm is horizontal, any further suspension compression will cause camber to increase, to the point where you may end up with positive camber on the outer wheels going around a corner at speed - which would not be at all good
Not true. it makes no difference to the camber change, if the arm is pointing 'down' or 'horizontal'.
Here's an exaggerated wire frame suspension drawing to show that it's true:
both wheels go over the same sized 'bump' and the camber change relative to horizontal is identical.
Regarding what causes bump steer, and why RCAs fix it, here are my thoughts. (I am possibly wrong)
The steering arms (as shown below in yellow) are on a longer (or shorter?) radius than the lower suspension arms. (shown in red) When the bottom arm moves up and down, the steering arm is moving through a different radius. The two radii of the suspension arm and steerin arm would be designed to intersect near the point of standard height/travel. When you lower it, you're moving the suspension travel to a point where the difference in length of the two radii is more pronounced. So when you go over a bump, the steering arm moves further towards the outside of the car than the lower suspension arm. Obviously if the steering arm and lower suspension arm arent parallel, then the wheel is going to be on an angle, turning the car. EDIT: Or thinking about it more, the radius of the steering arm and the suspension arm are more than likely the same on any half decent suspension setup. Perhaps its the difference in height/angle of the steering arm relative to the lower suspension arm that makes it travel through a different radius? Assuming that it does. I'm probably wrong, and would be happy to be corrected!
Maybe I should take some proper measurements of my suspension etc and model it to scale to see.
