Running a car without a filter

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Running a car without a filter

Postby method » Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:10 pm

I know this gets done a lot.

And for city driving etc there isn't heaps of larger dust particles around like if you drove on gravel roads every day.

Just wondering how bad no filter actually is?

Engine in question is a 4k im looking at buying.

Id never run a engine my self without a filter, id be to scared it would slowly stuff up the valve seats and piston rings.

Just wondering how damaging no filters actually are to engines such as 4k's.

I guess a cheap replacement 4k is easy to find though. Just because i need a reliable car..
PICS UPDATED DAILY
Evo IV - 13.0 @ 167.8 kph Full street trim - SOLD
Boosted 4age Ke30 - Im back and better than ever!
User avatar
method
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: West Auckland

Wind blown dust and grime....

Postby jondee86 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:27 pm

Dirt/dust from the air is the major cause of engine wear. Road dust
has a lot of silica in it, and silica is abrasive. Running an engine without
a filter just wears it out a lot quicker.

Depending on how much dust, you could easily see 100,000 km worth
of wear on the engine in less than 10,000 km.

Cheers... jondee86
1984 AE86 Corolla GT Liftback, NZ new... now with GZE
spec small port, twinscrew s/c and water/methanol injection :)

Watch this space >>> <<<
User avatar
jondee86
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby mjrstar » Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:30 pm

it's probably cheaper to buy a replacement 4k than a new filter!!
current cars:
Evo 4 230Kw atw
1971 mini.
79 bugeye 245kw atw.
Evo powered mx5 under construction

'not putting pictures in my signature since 2009'
User avatar
mjrstar
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:08 am

Postby Caveman » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:31 pm

lol remember when we bought my levin? that never had an air filter when I got it :lol:

Still running strong, as you know...
AW11 Track Toy
Formerly known as 1998
User avatar
Caveman
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 11:20 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby method » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:30 pm

Yeah, i was thinking that Caveman.

Thats why i wasn't so worried!

But yeah, apparently taking the filter off the 4k does wonders for "performance"
PICS UPDATED DAILY
Evo IV - 13.0 @ 167.8 kph Full street trim - SOLD
Boosted 4age Ke30 - Im back and better than ever!
User avatar
method
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby barryogen » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:33 pm

method wrote:Yeah, i was thinking that Caveman.

Thats why i wasn't so worried!

But yeah, apparently taking the filter off the 4k does wonders for "performance"


heh, removing any "obstruction" from the intake or exhaust will usually help performance, although it also tends to have fairly significant trade offs.

no cat(ylitic converter)
pros
- less backpressure, better performance
cons
- harms the environment and the things(including people) that live in it.
- usually makes mufflers much less effective meaning a lot more harsh exhaust noise

no filter
pros
- less intake obstruction, better air flow, engine leans a bit meaning usually better performance, and a bit better fuel economy(often negated by having foot harder up it).
cons
- engine will wear faster due to dust inhilation, MAF metre will probably foul up and need cleaning or replacing, and may worsen fuel economy cause further leaning of mixture which may cause damage(eventually).

Man do I know how to rant.
Last edited by barryogen on Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby scope » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:36 pm

i usually run a k series with out a filter because i can't be bothered going out and buying one but if it was a newer engine i definitely would then. that is my opinion, it's only a 4k :lol: it'll go for ever
chicken fillet and bacon with everything except onion and bbq, ranch and southwest sauces
-
current ride: 1980 mazda rx7 series 1
previous rides: ke36 corolla, series 1 rx7, ke30 corolla, ke70 corolla x2
scope
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: christchurch au

Postby touge rolla » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:55 pm

scope wrote: it's only a 4k :lol: it'll go for ever

just what i was thinking
driving around the city the air isn't exactly clean though, my new k&n is already disgustingly filthy after only 10,000kms. (perhaps chch roads are just dirty?)
User avatar
touge rolla
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:02 pm

method wrote:But yeah, apparently taking the filter off the 4k does wonders for "performance"


Nup, I gained 1kw at the wheel by taking off the Ramflo on my wagon.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby d1 mule » Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:09 pm

Dell'Orto wrote:
method wrote:But yeah, apparently taking the filter off the 4k does wonders for "performance"


Nup, I gained 1kw at the wheel by taking off the Ramflo on my wagon.


thats like DOUBLE the KW rating of a 4k tho.....
d1 mule
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: perth, WA


Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests