New Demerit + Fine System & Radar Dectectors Banned

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby FST4RD » Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:38 pm

Mr Revhead wrote:the reaon for the added harshness is its proven that fines dont matter a sh*t to the hardcore wankers who keep breaking the law
so they make it easier to loose the license
if the keep driving without a license its easier to do things like stick em in jail for a month etc.

as for a loud exhaust, its a major issue with the general public that focus's unwanted hate against our hobby.
take away that major gripe and a lot of the anti car enthusiast feelings go away... im all for it. they only wantto ban the arrogantly loud and offensive exhausts. i reckon even if your car was a little over the standards it wouldnt be a problem, untill you pull 6000rpm in first in the main street. in which case you deserve what you get


Fines don't matter to the hardcore wankers your right, but neither does losing their licence either.
1983 Mitsubishi Starion
1995 Subaru legacy GT SW

http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1542
User avatar
FST4RD
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby Bling » Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:28 pm

At the end of the day this will ONLY affect people that abide by the laws 95% of the time, pay their odd fine on time.

It won't affect people that constantly break the law and don't worry about demerrits / fines. Good example being the repeat drink drive offenders out there, they get caught with no license and over the limt, demerrits will worry them i guess tho... yeah right.

Its only going to affect the "innocent" drivers that don't really cause that many problems, but they will be stung the most. I don't condone running red lights or speeding. But they way this new system will work is that you stuff up twice within (at a guess) 2 years and you lose your license. What a load of bullshit

:evil:

I say innocent because compared to the people that go through red lights daily, speed all day long and don't pay fines etc..... they are what I would class as innocent.
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby BlakJak » Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:44 pm

postfach wrote:
MasCam wrote:From the Beehive website


Is there a proposal to ban speed detection and interference devices?



Errrr, anyone else notice that a speed detection device would be a radar gun like the police use? Since they use it to detect how fast we are going? Or even those signs on the side of the road that tell you how fast you're going.....

So, they're introducing a law to ban radar guns? Govt. self ownage....


viewtopic.php?p=623573&sid=cf1bd2337c44a0da4dabc61485840c33#623573
-.-. --.-
BlakJak - 2001 Toyota Gaia (yeah i'm all domesticated now)
(RIP Toyspeed Profiles! Finally had to disable them due to compatibility with newer versions of things. Sorry!)
User avatar
BlakJak
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4998
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 10:11 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby FST4RD » Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:37 pm

I think that the law is a bit soft for drunk drivers to be quite honest. I think for alot of offences it's a bit soft.
I was just watching on the news about the 2 guys that assulted a 60 year old police officer and then stole his police car, wonder what they will get, community service and a smack on the hand probably. Stick them in Jail for 2 years no parole with a clause that states break the law in any way what so ever and back in jail and they might think twice before committing another crime.
1983 Mitsubishi Starion
1995 Subaru legacy GT SW

http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1542
User avatar
FST4RD
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby 79rolla » Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:02 pm

and insted of just upping the demerits maby they could give the system a facelift??

did you know that you dont actuly get the demerits untill you pay the fine? my boss is trying to get around that atm by taking a speeding ticket through cort just to prolong the process b4 he has to pay it after some older points get wiped (a cop helpd tell him what he should do even) so this wont effect the people who dont pay fines any diferently anyway :roll: (even tho its been sed a few times)
Current:KE30 my baby,ke35 (now going to get the 2t treatment),isuzu spacecab ute
past: AE82 FXGT
(sorry about my sheit spelling)
User avatar
79rolla
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1756
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: the boondocks, te kuiti

Postby Si » Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:22 pm

you dont get the demerits untill you pay, but the demerits are dated as per the offence.

The only thing he is doing is delaying losing it.



I have been trying to find statistics based on how many people got demetrits, to work out how many more people the new laws would take off the road. Cant find any at all funnily enough.

After all, the amount of drivers is related to the number of accidents, and I would hate to have the government say that "the new laws are working"
when all they did was lower the driving population.
Current: , '96 SubaruImpreza
Previous: '92 EE80 Corolla, '91 JZZ30 Soarer(The single snail whale), '91 AE92 FXGT(Silvertop 20v), '92 JZA70 MkIIISupra (The twin snail whale), '82 MkV Cortina.
User avatar
Si
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1304
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Wellywood

Postby BlakJak » Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:26 pm

goddamn urban legends. The demerits are backdated so dragging it out doesn't help!
-.-. --.-
BlakJak - 2001 Toyota Gaia (yeah i'm all domesticated now)
(RIP Toyspeed Profiles! Finally had to disable them due to compatibility with newer versions of things. Sorry!)
User avatar
BlakJak
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4998
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 10:11 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby 79rolla » Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:40 pm

what he is doing is delaying getting the latest lot of demerits actuly on his licence untill an old one times out or watever they do... because the demerits only count twords the licenc once the bill is actuly payed
Current:KE30 my baby,ke35 (now going to get the 2t treatment),isuzu spacecab ute
past: AE82 FXGT
(sorry about my sheit spelling)
User avatar
79rolla
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1756
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: the boondocks, te kuiti

Postby BlakJak » Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:21 pm

Reread what Si and I just said.

Because the effective date of the demerit points is the day of your infringement - not the day you get paid - you will be deemed to have exceeded 100 and are still subject to suspension.
-.-. --.-
BlakJak - 2001 Toyota Gaia (yeah i'm all domesticated now)
(RIP Toyspeed Profiles! Finally had to disable them due to compatibility with newer versions of things. Sorry!)
User avatar
BlakJak
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 4998
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 10:11 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby AE82 FXGT » Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:39 pm

Not that I have ever owned a radar detector, but I just had a brainwave.

someone should come up with a navigation type device (navman etc) with a radar detector built in

Cops won't question a gps.
Previous: '85 AE82 FXGT, '92 AE101 GTZ, '92 AE101 GT-APEX, '04 SE3P RX8, '05 Mazda 6 MPS, '97 NA8C MX5, '03 GSX250, '08 ZX6R, '13 GROM
Current: '07 GRE156 BLADE MASTER G
User avatar
AE82 FXGT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:51 pm
Location: Lower hutt

Postby DexGT » Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:09 pm

AE82 FXGT wrote:Not that I have ever owned a radar detector, but I just had a brainwave.

someone should come up with a navigation type device (navman etc) with a radar detector built in

Cops won't question a gps.


Actually this would just get GPS units baned too as the police couldn't tell the difference between the radar GPS units and the straight GPS units
EP82 Starlet GT club race car;
best time around Manfield to date : 1:19:91

"Understeer" is when you hit the fence with the front of the car.
"Oversteer" is when you hit the fence with the rear of the car.
"Horsepower" is how fast you hit the fence.
"Torque" is how far you take the fence with you.
DexGT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 462
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 5:57 pm
Location: wellington

Postby flygt4 » Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:52 pm

BlakJak wrote:goddamn urban legends. The demerits are backdated so dragging it out doesn't help!


i think it was actually true for a while, they fixed it somewhere along the way.

the way it is now they are saying is by paying the fine you are admitting guilt and therefore get the demerits backdated to when the infringment notice was issued.
User avatar
flygt4
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby barryogen » Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:30 am

79rolla wrote:demerits for loud exust is complete bull


I semi-agree with you... but once it becomes a warrant item, then it'll be the same as driving with bald tyres etc.


snwtoy wrote:There is no proof having a radar detector encourages speeding.


So you've read every study into it then?

snwtoy wrote:Next they'll be saying that any car faster than a popo car is illegal.


Apart from the use of the word popo, which I'm guessing is some sort of slang for police car... I'm not completely against a hard limit of 120km/h on cars enforced at warrant time, and able to be checked roadside... although if I was a cop I'd be the type of prick to enforce everything on people that annoyed me.

flygt4 wrote:
BlakJak wrote:goddamn urban legends. The demerits are backdated so dragging it out doesn't help!


i think it was actually true for a while, they fixed it somewhere along the way.


It did used to work, but hasn't since atleast 2002... the last time I tried it.
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby snwtoy » Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:00 am

barryogen wrote:
snwtoy wrote:There is no proof having a radar detector encourages speeding.


So you've read every study into it then?


Naturally, no. But I've read a lot of articles and arguments etc about radar detectors and their legality both here and oveseas. If such a study existed the proponents of banning them would be waving it in our faces. Study doesn't exist because it's not possible to carry out anything more scientific than a survey on the subject, which can only ever provide circumstantial evidence anyway.

barryogen wrote:
snwtoy wrote:Next they'll be saying that any car faster than a popo car is illegal.


Apart from the use of the word popo, which I'm guessing is some sort of slang for police car... I'm not completely against a hard limit of 120km/h on cars enforced at warrant time, and able to be checked roadside... although if I was a cop I'd be the type of prick to enforce everything on people that annoyed me.

Why 120 and not 100?
User avatar
snwtoy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5810
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby barryogen » Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:18 am

snwtoy wrote:
barryogen wrote:
snwtoy wrote:Next they'll be saying that any car faster than a popo car is illegal.


I'm not completely against a hard limit of 120km/h on cars enforced at warrant time, and able to be checked roadside...

Why 120 and not 100?


incase of the need for a buffer to get ones self out of a bad situation while passing for instance... sure, it shouldn't happen, but sometimes it does.
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby Bling » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:04 pm

shouldn't need a buffer if you are over taking safely, seeing as this is all about being the safest driver possible and all..
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby FST4RD » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:15 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:shouldn't need a buffer if you are over taking safely, seeing as this is all about being the safest driver possible and all..


Yeah but what happens when your on the open road following Mr awesome travelling at 80, get to the passing lane to over take and he speeds up to 100, your then stuck not being able to overtake. I think it would be a mistake to cap speeds like that in cars.

I still think that the law is not hard enough.
If they made it that you get 100 demerit points for speeding and you get 6 months jail time for example would that make you think twice before going over the speed limit?
I sure as hell wouldn't dare go over the speed limit 1km!
1983 Mitsubishi Starion
1995 Subaru legacy GT SW

http://toyspeed.blakjak.net/profiles/pr ... hp?id=1542
User avatar
FST4RD
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby Al » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:34 pm

Cap speeds on cars and watch the road toll quadruple.
85 Corolla GT - 08 Blade Master G
Image
User avatar
Al
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6146
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:52 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby Al » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:44 pm

FST4RD wrote:I still think that the law is not hard enough.
If they made it that you get 100 demerit points for speeding and you get 6 months jail time for example would that make you think twice before going over the speed limit?
I sure as hell wouldn't dare go over the speed limit 1km!


Speeding isn't the problem though. Poor driving ability on crap roads with no where to go if something goes wrong is.

Its so easy to get a drivers licence here its not actually funny. As long as you look left and right and can use an indicator on your test you get a licence :x I can't actually believe how people fail their licence tests.

All these extra reforms and Prodrive closes because of lack of funding :roll:
85 Corolla GT - 08 Blade Master G
Image
User avatar
Al
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6146
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:52 pm
Location: Christchurch

Postby IH8TEC » Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:23 pm

there was an asian dude in westgate, auckland that got busted because he'd get all these asians that couldn't drive for sh1t but gave him $200-$500 cash each just so he'd pass them. :roll:
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests